Extension: Endogenous Observability and the Economics of Algorithmic Monitoring Applying and Extending the Hand Formula to AI Governance
Endogenous Observability and the Economics of Algorithmic Monitoring Applying and Extending the Hand Formula to AI Governance presents the following source proposition: This paper develops an economic analysis of algorithmic fairness monitoring requirements and does not constitute legal advice. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that The published UDLC Codex deliberately left its DAO governance architecture unspecified because no existing decentralized governance paradigm could simultaneously satisfy the UDLC's requirements for real-time adaptivity, incorruptible expert meritocracy, jurisdictional neutrality, and long-term economic sustainability. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
daogovernance-designlaw-and-legal-systemseconomicshistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref