Qualification: Large language models lack strategic agency: A Luhmannian critique of AI in energy governance
Large language models lack strategic agency: A Luhmannian critique of AI in energy governance presents the following source proposition: This Perspective argues that Synthetic Optimism is not an inherent limitation of LLM technology but a consequence of flawed socio-institutional design. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Contemporary AI's incapacity for authentic judgment under irreducible uncertainty is an institutional deficit rather than a computational one: an agent that bears no consequence for its errors cannot develop genuine discernment, no matter how capable it becomes. The proposed response is a qualification: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
ai-and-agentsinstitutional-designhistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref