kaal:position:2026-07-31-7465
Why Banking's AI Governance Gap Is a Systemic Risk and the Case for Binding Regulation in India presents the following source proposition: <p><span>Artificial intelligence has become core infrastructure in global banking , deployed across credit underwriting, fraud detection, customer service, and algorithmic trading. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Democratized banking is more responsive to regulation than centralized structures because ideas at the edge have greater opportunity to affect policy, unlike the existing global hierarchy in which a single group in Basel provides the dominant voice. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
decentralizationsystemic-riskgovernance-designhistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref