{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7466",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-7466",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Why Banking S Ai Governance Gap Is A Systemic Risk And The Case For Bind Bed0F70C3B",
 "text": "Why Banking's AI Governance Gap Is a Systemic Risk and the Case for Binding Regulation in India presents the following source proposition: As of 2025, 92% of global banks have deployed AI in at least one core function, while only 32% have formal AI governance programs in place. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Indirect regulation through Basel banking supervision removes the need for joint regulatory action and avoids each national regulator's transaction and implementation costs, because an international framework requires only one implementation and compliance then falls to participating banks. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "systemic-risk",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.4605.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Why Banking's AI Governance Gap Is a Systemic Risk and the Case for Binding Regulation in India",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6961060"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:3405660-040",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3405660-040",
  "citation": "Kaal, Indirect Regulation of Hedge Funds (2019). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3405660",
  "paper": "Kaal, Indirect Regulation of Hedge Funds",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2019",
  "ssrn": null,
  "source_pdf_sha256": "cf507b1833071765bc13a5605f38c2591582eca85f40869e38b6ff075c04d29d"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3405660-040"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Why Banking's AI Governance Gap Is a Systemic Risk and the Case for Binding Regulation in India",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6961060"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0009",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7466",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7466.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:a56d9089ce0c0899acb7",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.4605,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: banking, systemic, risk, regulation, banks, one, only. Scope: review source claim scope.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.2139/ssrn.6961060",
  "queryId": "concept:b5ce5d92d4b5",
  "queryText": "AI agent governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6961060",
  "doi": "10.2139/ssrn.6961060",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.2139/ssrn.6961060",
   "Crossref": "10.2139/ssrn.6961060"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T20:34:04.363Z",
  "providerPage": 12,
  "rawObservationSha256": "58831137ba12d8d3fef33f36e31c170c47a74c8445fb1464f64311bbee1976e8",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "95f3c3e1638ca36a1683b7a07036b5ed8191ad7a1549b24a5ebff941a468f5ce",
  "inputLine": 2929,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00003",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.2139/ssrn.6961060",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Ankit Chaudhary"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2026-01-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.2139/ssrn.6961060",
   "crossref:10.2139/ssrn.6961060",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6961060",
   "title:e42fa063b7f6d9288a436306",
   "proposition:36aa30ad54842c0519f506fae4be71f12b402d53c66fb62ba0e5466b82a15052"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "As of 2025, 92% of global banks have deployed AI in at least one core function, while only 32% have formal AI governance programs in place.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "695bc6eb986941ff1beb0f13f0f3dbc89d9981f1bad395ec5bdab5ee85454703",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 1,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3405660-040",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3405660-040",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.4605,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: banking, systemic, risk, regulation, banks, one, only. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3406323-028",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3406323-028",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.4519,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: banking, governance, systemic, risk, regulation, global, have. Scope: decentralized banking and underwriting with well designed governance.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:1558614-008",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1558614-008",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.4334,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: systemic, risk, banks, have, one, while, only. Scope: written before the sovereign debt crisis had fully played out; assumes the two shocks compound rather than offset.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5454054-032",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5454054-032",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.4084,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, systemic, risk, 2025, function. Scope: United States securities law.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5887242-029",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5887242-029",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.4046,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, systemic, risk, 2025, core. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0009, SHA-256 b79e655db33b69d4e6de8a205792c1e02d068eea4880d69cd6faeb884041abdf, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "8e762d4fd861845dbec4049c603e2a0bf4aad6fd597830b74edef2f6d33efd01"
}