kaal:position:2026-07-31-7485
Artificial Intelligence Governance in Public Administration: National Regulatory Approaches in Italy and Spain under the EU AI Act presents the following source proposition: While the AI Act establishes a harmonised, risk-based regulatory framework, its practical impact on public authorities largely depends on domestic regulatory choices concerning institutional design, supervision and administrative capacity. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that In the computative commons the governance task inverts: because realization-level output is non-rival while generative capacity is rival, governance must prevent generation-level degradation of the generative substrate rather than consumption-level exhaustion of a pool. The proposed response is a qualification: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
governance-designinstitutional-designhistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref