{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7538",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-7538",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Ai Governance A Comparative Approach Ee230F02B0",
 "text": "AI Governance: A Comparative Approach presents the following source proposition: Courts, lawyers, law firms, experts, and others may have initially considered that the impacts would not be significant. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Courts often provide very specific language about the standard of conduct expected of directors, but lawyers do not sufficiently communicate that expected conduct to directors. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "corporate-governance",
  "law-and-legal-systems",
  "empirical-evidence",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.4365.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "AI Governance: A Comparative Approach",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2026.10182"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-009",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-009",
  "citation": "Kaal, A Comparative Perspective on the Limitations of the Duty of Oversight – A Comment on Lisa Fairfax (2013)",
  "paper": "Kaal, A Comparative Perspective on the Limitations of the Duty of Oversight – A Comment on Lisa Fairfax",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2013",
  "ssrn": null,
  "source_pdf_sha256": "ac5c955fe01209c54c78c4575c0b8bf570e5f1259c3f855510697cf51a32e59a"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-009"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "AI Governance: A Comparative Approach",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2026.10182"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0009",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7538",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7538.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:05a16f143f5f08dd1d0e",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.4365,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, comparative, courts, lawyers, law, not. Scope: United States corporate officers and directors.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.1017/glj.2026.10182",
  "queryId": "concept:b5ce5d92d4b5",
  "queryText": "AI agent governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2026.10182",
  "doi": "10.1017/glj.2026.10182",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.1017/glj.2026.10182",
   "Crossref": "10.1017/glj.2026.10182"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T20:34:05.446Z",
  "providerPage": 15,
  "rawObservationSha256": "17ecab813f7785c4a2c4b7fbc0a289601cb4472533943a768263f77e4b079863",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "95f3c3e1638ca36a1683b7a07036b5ed8191ad7a1549b24a5ebff941a468f5ce",
  "inputLine": 3613,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00006",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.1017/glj.2026.10182",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Tania Sourdin",
   "Bin Li"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2025-10-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.1017/glj.2026.10182",
   "crossref:10.1017/glj.2026.10182",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2026.10182",
   "title:60b46a1b2914658045b76784",
   "proposition:269b72a4f60df30825cc8c5b6b85b58e232c1984b539542f9550e89a6baef65c"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Courts, lawyers, law firms, experts, and others may have initially considered that the impacts would not be significant.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "4a032d8889e5ad2ba1011f1587efd46b32fcdf75558e47ebf154d60326250ca3",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 0,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-009",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-009",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.4365,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, comparative, courts, lawyers, law, not. Scope: United States corporate officers and directors.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:617681-041",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/617681-041",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3751,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: courts, lawyers, law, experts, not. Scope: Europe, in contrast with the single language United States.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-017",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-017",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3523,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, comparative, courts, law, have. Scope: cases involving extreme facts at the cusp of culpable conduct.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-021",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-021",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.3523,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, comparative, courts, law, have. Scope: more oversight suits reach the merits.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3002908-008",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3002908-008",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.34,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: comparative, courts, law, have, not. Scope: as of the article's publication in 2017; based on searches of US federal and state case law and of Italian, French, Dutch, UK, German, and EU court databases.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0009, SHA-256 b79e655db33b69d4e6de8a205792c1e02d068eea4880d69cd6faeb884041abdf, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "095f929664f11374860e0c2ff7542a9389822fcd446515dd6b790f5ac843eb1e"
}