{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7556",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-7556",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Governance Of Ai In The Judicial System F56A27B594",
 "text": "Governance of AI in the Judicial System presents the following source proposition: Furthermore, the impact on human rights is studied to determine whether a risk analysis is necessary. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that The EU AI Act classifies AI applications used in judicial proceedings as high risk because of their potential to affect fundamental rights such as due process and non-discrimination, and therefore subjects them to mandatory transparency, bias audits, and human oversight. The proposed response is a qualification: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "ai-and-agents",
  "systemic-risk",
  "risk-and-incentives",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.4981.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Governance of AI in the Judicial System",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/9780198918752.003.0015"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:5541658-024",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-024",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2025",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "e543a2d698fcd522d4d02e034cc9ee1344d0015d2c824b40b9e05ab7c0728c60"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-024"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Governance of AI in the Judicial System",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/9780198918752.003.0015"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0009",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7556",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7556.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:6012d4c9e8dd36b0d7fb",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.4981,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: judicial, impact, human, rights, risk. Scope: European Union; AI systems used in judicial proceedings including predictive analytics and judicial decision support.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.1093/9780198918752.003.0015",
  "queryId": "concept:b5ce5d92d4b5",
  "queryText": "AI agent governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1093/9780198918752.003.0015",
  "doi": "10.1093/9780198918752.003.0015",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.1093/9780198918752.003.0015",
   "Crossref": "10.1093/9780198918752.003.0015"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T20:34:05.849Z",
  "providerPage": 16,
  "rawObservationSha256": "fc7dae652fe8fe52a77cb195301133e55cf980ffa8a8c3efd224354d3d79cfbc",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "95f3c3e1638ca36a1683b7a07036b5ed8191ad7a1549b24a5ebff941a468f5ce",
  "inputLine": 3800,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00006",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.1093/9780198918752.003.0015",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Javier Valls-Prieto"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2025-09-25",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.1093/9780198918752.003.0015",
   "crossref:10.1093/9780198918752.003.0015",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.1093/9780198918752.003.0015",
   "title:906e3f0142c151eb92d7752c",
   "proposition:827ad587332e5e48c01b9fea1472b0c9e626f385d72d01ab6d948f818dc26b71"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Furthermore, the impact on human rights is studied to determine whether a risk analysis is necessary.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "9bc6341beaa2c3037a51b6a236878a4805d1cecee8166b45095913b9ab53ebab",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 2,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5541658-024",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-024",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.4981,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: judicial, impact, human, rights, risk. Scope: European Union; AI systems used in judicial proceedings including predictive analytics and judicial decision support.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3782220-025",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782220-025",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3609,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, determine, whether, risk. Scope: any network, society, or DAO.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:1998455-021",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1998455-021",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3393,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, rights, risk, necessary. Scope: where SIFIs hold similar risk profiles and CCS positions in similarly exposed entities; especially where cross holdings are reciprocal.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5541658-005",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-005",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.3303,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: judicial, human, rights. Scope: European Court of Human Rights; Article 6 cases; prediction against existing judgments.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:1908473-015",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1908473-015",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.2996,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: determine, whether, risk. Scope: Turns on the design features of the securities and on how much control equity holders retain after conversion.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0009, SHA-256 b79e655db33b69d4e6de8a205792c1e02d068eea4880d69cd6faeb884041abdf, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "cbe4a639815a3da9fe0012115c5b9e4b42aefb3a9875e5b3bc1d0938f917c47a"
}