{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7561",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-7561",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Ai Washing As An It Governance Problem Strategic Ambiguity In Corporate  91283F1986",
 "text": "AI Washing as an IT Governance Problem: Strategic Ambiguity in Corporate Disclosures and the Consequences of Regulatory Enforcement presents the following source proposition: Firms increasingly claim artificial intelligence (AI) capability in their public disclosures, yet investors and regulators have few means of verifying such claims. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Bankruptcy and systemic risk disclosure obligations for hedge funds have different origins and serve different purposes: bankruptcy disclosure is meant to level the playing field in the restructuring process, while systemic risk disclosure is meant to help regulators detect and prevent systemic consequences. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "systemic-risk",
  "disclosure",
  "risk-and-incentives",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.3554.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "AI Washing as an IT Governance Problem: Strategic Ambiguity in Corporate Disclosures and the Consequences of Regulatory Enforcement",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6959279"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:2348463-018",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2348463-018",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Hedge Funds’ Systemic Risk Disclosures in Bankruptcy (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2348463",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Hedge Funds’ Systemic Risk Disclosures in Bankruptcy",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2013",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=2348463",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "b3682f24c0b277b3307fb9f54cd17a4e0a87b48eecba34b40e189212f20c9a22"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2348463-018"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "AI Washing as an IT Governance Problem: Strategic Ambiguity in Corporate Disclosures and the Consequences of Regulatory Enforcement",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6959279"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0009",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7561",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7561.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:991dd440fca44ebe9eef",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.3554,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: disclosures, consequences, regulators, have. Scope: review source claim scope.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.2139/ssrn.6959279",
  "queryId": "concept:b5ce5d92d4b5",
  "queryText": "AI agent governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6959279",
  "doi": "10.2139/ssrn.6959279",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.2139/ssrn.6959279",
   "Crossref": "10.2139/ssrn.6959279"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T20:34:05.849Z",
  "providerPage": 16,
  "rawObservationSha256": "0dd72a206ddd2872e7e9725646d9946936ddac2ac1f775a30dd53c427c5f6c47",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "95f3c3e1638ca36a1683b7a07036b5ed8191ad7a1549b24a5ebff941a468f5ce",
  "inputLine": 3885,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00007",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.2139/ssrn.6959279",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Yuan Zhang",
   "Michael Rivera"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2026-01-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.2139/ssrn.6959279",
   "crossref:10.2139/ssrn.6959279",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6959279",
   "title:a2fdb350c5e2be64a21003c3",
   "proposition:5d6a413f87be3025f9a6fcff73755d439204789a1ee529f21469c59ef43f7124"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Firms increasingly claim artificial intelligence (AI) capability in their public disclosures, yet investors and regulators have few means of verifying such claims.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "b06e86848c0bd71c32a5d623930ef1da94187a60e671167bc4ab833979a87e32",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 0,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2348463-018",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2348463-018",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.3554,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: disclosures, consequences, regulators, have. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5541658-015",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-015",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3532,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: problem, artificial, intelligence, such. Scope: systems using computational models of argument to generate legally grounded explanations.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2447306-020",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2447306-020",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3217,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: disclosures, investors, few. Scope: responses to survey Question 14a.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5541658-014",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-014",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.3164,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: artificial, intelligence, have. Scope: AI outputs that inform or shape judicial decisions.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2348463-005",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2348463-005",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3128,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: disclosures, such, claims. Scope: groups, committees, and entities acting in concert in chapter 9 and chapter 11 cases.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0009, SHA-256 b79e655db33b69d4e6de8a205792c1e02d068eea4880d69cd6faeb884041abdf, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "c3a418c3bdabcf8cc0adbbba758f1361fa666a55d70a8a490aa99f3278574066"
}