kaal:position:2026-07-31-7609

Delegated AI Governance presents the following source proposition: Causal mechanisms are reconstructed on the basis of a qualitative design with process tracing. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that The delegated-acts and code-of-practice mechanisms in recent artificial-intelligence statutes are only partial steps toward dynamic regulation because they remain tethered to legislative revision cycles running far slower than the technology they govern. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.

• The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
• External evidence level: abstract indexed.
• Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.
• Primary mapping confidence: 0.3502.
• The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation.

Delegated AI Governance

kaal:claim:6607458-032
Wulf A. Kaal, Computative Economics A Framework for Economic Analysis under Computational Abundance (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6607458
Source PDF sha256: 75cca35350378eb8904866d068b5d2f3e1504629e6031457ce6c12152a88e3e8

Evidence: abstract indexed
Review tier: moderate-confidence claim review
Mapping confidence: 0.3502
Mapping ambiguous: true

ai-and-agentsgovernance-designdynamic-regulationhistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref

Affirmed in kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0009 on 2026-07-31. Review record.

Canonical markdown sha256: 2c000b9b3496d9b37f0234ccf4f5bbd094992efe46cebcfa95c1640c09b1c860
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7609.md | sha256sum