{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7676",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-7676",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Ethics And Governance In Ai Management 2Ba45D5E52",
 "text": "ETHICS AND GOVERNANCE IN AI MANAGEMENT presents the following source proposition: It examines how ethical principles and governance mechanisms facilitate the responsible use of AI, taking into account both legal obligations and social expectations. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Building lawyers' capacity to think about the social and ethical implications of code is both essential and inevitable, but saying anything sensible about the ethics of technology first requires understanding coding and coders. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "education-and-practice",
  "open-source-and-code",
  "law-and-legal-systems",
  "ai-and-agents",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.3528.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "ETHICS AND GOVERNANCE IN AI MANAGEMENT",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.18276/978-83-8419-028-9-37"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:3227967-030",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227967-030",
  "citation": "Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in a Digital Age Why 'Coding for Lawyers' Matters (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227967",
  "paper": "Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in a Digital Age Why 'Coding for Lawyers' Matters",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2018",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227967",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "f6e13b956f864ab32ec3305d095a35a127770327d75b3688f785cefc437d369f"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227967-030"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "ETHICS AND GOVERNANCE IN AI MANAGEMENT",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.18276/978-83-8419-028-9-37"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0010",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7676",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7676.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:1077eaf0c8c81895f92f",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.3528,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: ethics, ethical, both, legal, social. Scope: ethical questions raised by automation, artificial intelligence and driverless vehicles.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.18276/978-83-8419-028-9-37",
  "queryId": "concept:b5ce5d92d4b5",
  "queryText": "AI agent governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.18276/978-83-8419-028-9-37",
  "doi": "10.18276/978-83-8419-028-9-37",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.18276/978-83-8419-028-9-37",
   "Crossref": "10.18276/978-83-8419-028-9-37"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T20:34:07.368Z",
  "providerPage": 20,
  "rawObservationSha256": "cf514b80107e0b144efeb5c156c5357d8e669e78a0d0fe8e9c6d3a1c077382ed",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "38854b992555b92444c77ee205e21525efdcb5784dcf9267d112df4b84928413",
  "inputLine": 4927,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00002",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.18276/978-83-8419-028-9-37",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Aleksandra Klich",
   "Bartosz Brożyński",
   "Yuliia Khvatsik",
   "Marcin Białecki"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "null-01-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.18276/978-83-8419-028-9-37",
   "crossref:10.18276/978-83-8419-028-9-37",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.18276/978-83-8419-028-9-37",
   "title:c35b2e5719653684dc8ba60a",
   "proposition:76e7af81ef642abea3f69f69935262730d85ffb6a30dcd7c2be4f9d973f67f45"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "It examines how ethical principles and governance mechanisms facilitate the responsible use of AI, taking into account both legal obligations and social expectations.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "13d11631f3f0c359b2933ebcaa6d7e6c35a744201b07bc7b6ca2d70b2f0390f1",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 0,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3227967-030",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227967-030",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.3528,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: ethics, ethical, both, legal, social. Scope: ethical questions raised by automation, artificial intelligence and driverless vehicles.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:1558614-032",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1558614-032",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.256,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, responsible, taking, legal. Scope: risk must be of a kind that securities law requires to be disclosed.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2831040-029",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2831040-029",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.2451,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: principles, mechanisms, both, legal. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:4941807-039",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4941807-039",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.2449,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, ethical, legal, expectations. Scope: where new governance elements can be added as vertices and edges to the existing graph.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5554218-036",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5554218-036",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.2401,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, ethical, principles, legal. Scope: hybrid governance combining a universal ethical baseline with localized adaptation.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0010, SHA-256 702170a5716aed9e79302e88407930485844aeec8c140fe64a7bf7d5dd9603af, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "707ace702310c29b97ae59aced875855f9f0807c49217ef228cdae0f85829943"
}