kaal:position:2026-07-31-7718

Why, Who, What, When and How about Explainability in Human-Agent Systems presents the following source proposition: We then consider when the user should be presented with this information. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Post hoc explainability techniques do not by themselves establish trustworthiness; the explanations they produce must additionally be verified against human knowledge. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.

Affirmed commentary position. This record extends a source-bound scholarly claim but is not a verbatim paper claim.

Holds when

The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
External evidence level: abstract indexed.
Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.
Primary mapping confidence: 0.3905.
The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation.

Current debate

Why, Who, What, When and How about Explainability in Human-Agent Systems

Scholarly basis

kaal:claim:5541658-012
Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658
Source PDF sha256: e543a2d698fcd522d4d02e034cc9ee1344d0015d2c824b40b9e05ab7c0728c60

Evidence and mapping

Evidence: abstract indexed
Review tier: moderate-confidence claim review
Mapping confidence: 0.3905
Mapping ambiguous: true

Topics

ai-and-agentsreputationhistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref

Provenance

Affirmed in kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0010 on 2026-07-31. Review record.

Verify

Canonical markdown sha256: 14b3b6156d355e0d7b3c5c0d0e341f9f247bc09e9d4f0eb321ae957141bea8d8
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7718.md | sha256sum