{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7757",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-7757",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming A Multi Agent Game For Studying Human Decision Making 1Db3Ff6447",
 "text": "A multi-agent game for studying human decision-making presents the following source proposition: Understanding how human beings delegate tasks to trustees when presented with reputation information is important for building trust models for human-agent collectives. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that For the parts of dealmaking and other legal tasks that cannot be placed on a blockchain, the role of non blockchainable agents of trust may expand, and blockchain driven disintermediation of law may itself create additional legal tasks requiring human lawyers. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "decentralization",
  "reputation",
  "blockchain",
  "law-and-legal-systems",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.3582.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "A multi-agent game for studying human decision-making",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.65109/aghe1243"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:2939127-040",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2939127-040",
  "citation": "Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in the Blockchain Revolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2939127",
  "paper": "Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in the Blockchain Revolution",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2017",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=2939127",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "abcef529c7200261c59eec43018375b3b26e3186239fb9d002bacc298dba26ff"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2939127-040"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "A multi-agent game for studying human decision-making",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.65109/aghe1243"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0010",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7757",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7757.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:5ed295909db5caaf43e7",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.3582,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: human, tasks, reputation, trust. Scope: legal tasks that require the ambiguity and flexibility of law.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.65109/aghe1243",
  "queryId": "concept:a2c487c0792c",
  "queryText": "autonomous agent accountability",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.65109/aghe1243",
  "doi": "10.65109/aghe1243",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.65109/aghe1243",
   "Crossref": "10.65109/aghe1243"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T21:32:46.232Z",
  "providerPage": 15,
  "rawObservationSha256": "4fbeb59293fef1c039588c4d7fa55b02aaac16f19ca5a4b1583fb057a6f226ce",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "4b76446dc6bf1d55513942e74f6c92a8a87ed7fe9173be4b65944f26fb34b117",
  "inputLine": 8703,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00017",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.65109/aghe1243",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Han Yu",
   "Xinjia Yu",
   "Su Fang Lim",
   "Jun Lin",
   "Zhiqi Shen",
   "Chunyan Miao"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2014-05-05",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.65109/aghe1243",
   "crossref:10.65109/aghe1243",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.65109/aghe1243",
   "title:5f2a11804f57e3c53b37f636",
   "proposition:a36ce70cba3b892cc88246d52963af8c9f980a385698294bf4f3bd22c0d86519"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Understanding how human beings delegate tasks to trustees when presented with reputation information is important for building trust models for human-agent collectives.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "c864eb26481230fcf1e9529d655d9722379ed959abe4423c931155a79f6619a0",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 0,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2939127-040",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2939127-040",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.3582,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: human, tasks, reputation, trust. Scope: legal tasks that require the ambiguity and flexibility of law.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5254152-004",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5254152-004",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3502,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: decision, making, reputation, trust. Scope: DAOs allocating voting power by contribution history, community feedback, or peer review.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5541658-029",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-029",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3502,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: decision, making, reputation, trust. Scope: the existing empirical literature on AI in judicial systems.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3709041-014",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3709041-014",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.3471,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: human, decision, reputation, trust. Scope: applies to trust generated by legal guarantees and judicial enforcement.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3808867-010",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3808867-010",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3471,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: human, decision, reputation, trust. Scope: trust created by legal guarantees and judicial enforcement in capitalist and socialist systems.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0010, SHA-256 702170a5716aed9e79302e88407930485844aeec8c140fe64a7bf7d5dd9603af, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "a75a801e0863a078cec6ac6cb62eb117cefee48c1b05f18b161a7d24d59c30a3"
}