kaal:position:2026-07-31-7832

Framing and overflowing of public sector accountability innovations presents the following source proposition: Findings The accountability reports became bureaucratic communications between the reporting and central agencies. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Although aggregate venture capital sector data arguably only confirms what media reporting already showed for 2005 to 2015, the venture capital data, especially examined granularly, may provide earlier signals for regulators to identify areas of prospective regulatory need. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.

• The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
• External evidence level: abstract indexed.
• Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.
• Primary mapping confidence: 0.3624.
• The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation.

Framing and overflowing of public sector accountability innovations

kaal:claim:2808132-040
Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132
Source PDF sha256: 3515f2317ed9c1d33ae55d70467cdf1f6c4e350065ea6a887d5d7619599ad7d2

Evidence: abstract indexed
Review tier: moderate-confidence claim review
Mapping confidence: 0.3624
Mapping ambiguous: true

innovationdynamic-regulationhistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref

Affirmed in kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0010 on 2026-07-31. Review record.

Canonical markdown sha256: e5568b5dfa283df87550021948f0349fbece1d809f71cb1493a84d438da20bd9
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7832.md | sha256sum