{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7842",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-7842",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Doing Just Enough 1D95827Fff",
 "text": "Doing Just Enough? presents the following source proposition: This chapter demonstrates that the theory of quasi-compliance is a useful framework for understanding post-atrocity governments' reactions to international pressure for accountability. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that The SEC's efforts to clarify and optimize the post Dodd-Frank framework cut both ways: they supported industry compliance with the revised standards while simultaneously creating uncertainty and higher costs for the industry. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "securities-law",
  "compliance",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.3791.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Doing Just Enough?",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501763571.003.0006"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:2998097-016",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2998097-016",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Private Investment Fund Regulation - Theory and Empirical Evidence from 1998 to 2016 (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2998097",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Private Investment Fund Regulation - Theory and Empirical Evidence from 1998 to 2016",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2017",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=2998097",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "0955054f49c7011d33c285579bb046e6b284e42755b10fd2546a728c202669d5"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2998097-016"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Doing Just Enough?",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501763571.003.0006"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0010",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7842",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7842.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:6ed239b9230acc0d2d7d",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.3791,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: theory, compliance, framework, post. Scope: SEC implementation and clarification of Title IV registration and reporting rules.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.7591/cornell/9781501763571.003.0006",
  "queryId": "concept:a2c487c0792c",
  "queryText": "autonomous agent accountability",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501763571.003.0006",
  "doi": "10.7591/cornell/9781501763571.003.0006",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.7591/cornell/9781501763571.003.0006",
   "Crossref": "10.7591/cornell/9781501763571.003.0006"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T21:32:54.930Z",
  "providerPage": 39,
  "rawObservationSha256": "a934cd2888684bfdc85afc0f7e716ee6ead60dfa3cdeea94596f3fcee7948ef3",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "4b76446dc6bf1d55513942e74f6c92a8a87ed7fe9173be4b65944f26fb34b117",
  "inputLine": 14674,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00041",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.7591/cornell/9781501763571.003.0006",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Kate Cronin-Furman"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2022-11-15",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.7591/cornell/9781501763571.003.0006",
   "crossref:10.7591/cornell/9781501763571.003.0006",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501763571.003.0006",
   "title:696f75db770748850fe0cdaf",
   "proposition:20bacb770da249ee32409249103863a2b5847b81c9e73bef87bd80ae3e9f15f7"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "This chapter demonstrates that the theory of quasi-compliance is a useful framework for understanding post-atrocity governments' reactions to international pressure for accountability.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "8d395521c5e5fb42c75f62adbfe16db613311265317efac2e770a551f3d40692",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 0,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2998097-016",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2998097-016",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.3791,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: theory, compliance, framework, post. Scope: SEC implementation and clarification of Title IV registration and reporting rules.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2739479-023",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2739479-023",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3539,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: doing, compliance, post. Scope: comparison of 2012 and 2015 survey responses; holds under some metrics only.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2739479-026",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2739479-026",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3363,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: just, compliance, post. Scope: conditional on hours being a valid proxy for cost; all federal regulation applicable to private fund advisers.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2732915-039",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2732915-039",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.3217,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: compliance, framework, post. Scope: SEC rule amendments, guidance, and frequently asked questions issued after 2012.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:4941807-040",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4941807-040",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3217,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: compliance, framework, post. Scope: where each AI model or development milestone is documented as a post with edges to relevant precedents.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0010, SHA-256 702170a5716aed9e79302e88407930485844aeec8c140fe64a7bf7d5dd9603af, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "e5d970629d6da1b517b6c03048f9b28f64189f0e33cd5f22cdec674d4301c64f"
}