{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7843",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-7843",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Doing Just Enough B42C695F26",
 "text": "Doing Just Enough? presents the following source proposition: It points out how the two case studies illuminate the potential payoffs of quasi-compliance. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Prior scholarship on the corporate governance effects of non and deferred prosecution agreements rests largely on anecdotal evidence and individual case studies rather than on systematic evidence, which is why its conclusions about those effects are unreliable. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "empirical-evidence",
  "research-methods",
  "compliance",
  "governance-design",
  "corporate-governance",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.4145.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Doing Just Enough?",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501763571.003.0006"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:2486570-002",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2486570-002",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Timothy Lacine, The Effect of Deferred and Non-Prosecution Agreements on Corporate Governance Evidence from 1993-20 (2014). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2486570",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Timothy Lacine, The Effect of Deferred and Non-Prosecution Agreements on Corporate Governance Evidence from 1993-20",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2014",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=2486570",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "8c3981c9a55d8a3fe59a01660584eebc3feb3fb9109ca65344095bebe4ae49a4"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2486570-002"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Doing Just Enough?",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501763571.003.0006"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0010",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7843",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7843.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:cfe0fbd5bbb0f9db6103",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.4145,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: case, studies, compliance. Scope: review source claim scope.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.7591/cornell/9781501763571.003.0006",
  "queryId": "concept:a2c487c0792c",
  "queryText": "autonomous agent accountability",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501763571.003.0006",
  "doi": "10.7591/cornell/9781501763571.003.0006",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.7591/cornell/9781501763571.003.0006",
   "Crossref": "10.7591/cornell/9781501763571.003.0006"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T21:32:54.930Z",
  "providerPage": 39,
  "rawObservationSha256": "a934cd2888684bfdc85afc0f7e716ee6ead60dfa3cdeea94596f3fcee7948ef3",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "4b76446dc6bf1d55513942e74f6c92a8a87ed7fe9173be4b65944f26fb34b117",
  "inputLine": 14674,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00041",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.7591/cornell/9781501763571.003.0006",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Kate Cronin-Furman"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2022-11-15",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.7591/cornell/9781501763571.003.0006",
   "crossref:10.7591/cornell/9781501763571.003.0006",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501763571.003.0006",
   "title:696f75db770748850fe0cdaf",
   "proposition:ad4feb4a73619ce08023978d7f80e56aa5bd570b9f42af3922c2deb7bcdf04eb"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "It points out how the two case studies illuminate the potential payoffs of quasi-compliance.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "cfa70f27454cab5148bf512f9c9cdb93d9cfdd2856dd20be5b0218a95587219a",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 2,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2486570-002",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2486570-002",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.4145,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: case, studies, compliance. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2739479-023",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2739479-023",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3549,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: doing, compliance. Scope: comparison of 2012 and 2015 survey responses; holds under some metrics only.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-036",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-036",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3532,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: quasi, compliance. Scope: corporations subject to a Corporate Integrity Agreement.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3936876-032",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3936876-032",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.3359,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: points, compliance. Scope: surveyed custodial service providers, 2020 benchmarking study.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:4685567-017",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4685567-017",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3359,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: points, compliance. Scope: centralized consulting model for impact measurement.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0010, SHA-256 702170a5716aed9e79302e88407930485844aeec8c140fe64a7bf7d5dd9603af, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "627d4d184141b7b88a1876c926ad4da522ff78605cfa9a45e2c170493a8255d8"
}