{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7907",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-7907",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Evolutionary Auction Design For Agent Based Marketplaces Fee4C97Eba",
 "text": "Evolutionary Auction Design for Agent-based Marketplaces states the retrieved proposition: Market mechanism or auction design research is playing an important role in computational economics for resolving multi-agent allocation problems. Kaal's protected corpus separately states: An auction mechanism for fair launch tokens avoids pricing tokens below their underlying market value, which in turn helps remedy the problems that derive from large whale token holders who can later manipulate the market. The defensible response is a qualification limited to the shared issue identified in the review rationale. This abstract-level comparison does not establish broader agreement, causation, empirical support, or equivalence.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "economics",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.4528.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation.",
  "Crossref abstract-indexed proposition only; full text not independently reviewed.",
  "Ambiguity is preserved because the review supports comparison, not equivalence or endorsement."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Evolutionary Auction Design for Agent-based Marketplaces",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-588-7.ch005"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:4015908-035",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4015908-035",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Fair Token Launch (2022). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4015908",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Fair Token Launch",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2022",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=4015908",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "e0925afde0c42a16cd5310983789fae3eb3d1f121e2954a72afa64191d00fe37"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4015908-035"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Evolutionary Auction Design for Agent-based Marketplaces",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-588-7.ch005"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0011-reviewed-v3",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7907",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7907.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:28ca263decf68e0e56d6",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.4528,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Independent substantive review found a bounded comparison concerning auction design for agent-mediated resource allocation. The external proposition expressly states auction design resolves multi-agent allocation problems; the protected Kaal claim expressly states a fair-launch token auction addresses underpricing and whale manipulation. The reviewed response quotes both propositions, labels the mapping ambiguous, and does not infer agreement, causation, empirical support, or equivalence.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.4018/978-1-59904-588-7.ch005",
  "queryId": "concept:a2c487c0792c",
  "queryText": "autonomous agent accountability",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-588-7.ch005",
  "doi": "10.4018/978-1-59904-588-7.ch005",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.4018/978-1-59904-588-7.ch005",
   "Crossref": "10.4018/978-1-59904-588-7.ch005"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T21:34:47.399Z",
  "providerPage": 73,
  "rawObservationSha256": "fd612e7f827d519cd2803108900673993c548d73163d0b5ee28793efd51f3409",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "74d3e30ce1df7977214335c42424af170b70d4495a83d3d84b9d79aa5640a168",
  "inputLine": 23228,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00016",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.4018/978-1-59904-588-7.ch005",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Zengchang Qin"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2008-01-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.4018/978-1-59904-588-7.ch005",
   "crossref:10.4018/978-1-59904-588-7.ch005",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-588-7.ch005",
   "title:a1f0172b2d56cab9e5e99edb",
   "proposition:11e674380d098f630b7cb2ba3effb0e5aa1c06e7375ac3ca23c4526f9ac8d534"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Market mechanism or auction design research is playing an important role in computational economics for resolving multi-agent allocation problems.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "1ce132c638081511cafedea214c40f530e022af0984777f5bc09040216826686",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 0,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:4015908-035",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4015908-035",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.4528,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: auction, market, mechanism, economics, problems. Scope: public auction of tokens at launch.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:6192998-020",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/6192998-020",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3983,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: agent, mechanism, economics, multi. Scope: multiple agents competing on the same job.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:1998455-038",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1998455-038",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3972,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: design, market, mechanism, important, economics. Scope: where the concern is competitors acquiring voting rights as equity holders upon conversion.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3373393-027",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3373393-027",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.395,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: design, agent, market, economics, problems. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2714974-027",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2714974-027",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3694,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: market, research, economics, problems. Scope: applies to direct regulation of hedge fund leverage.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-substantive-review-v2-manual-adjudication",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-07-31T22:08:42.497Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex substantive evidence review with manual adjudication",
   "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:28ca263decf68e0e56d6",
   "originalBatchId": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0011",
   "reviewedBatchId": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0011-reviewed-v3",
   "originalRecordSha256": "6e5374ab2218f81fdb4ac54b596b2eb9b9d9eb7e1b8da0b1c455949f6961dcde",
   "propositionSha256": "1ce132c638081511cafedea214c40f530e022af0984777f5bc09040216826686",
   "sourceRecordId": "10.4018/978-1-59904-588-7.ch005",
   "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
   "priorReviewDisposition": "retained",
   "finalDisposition": "retained",
   "originalPrimaryClaimId": "kaal:claim:4015908-035",
   "reviewedPrimaryClaimId": "kaal:claim:4015908-035",
   "mappingAction": "primary-mapping-confirmed",
   "relevance": "bounded-domain-specific-relevance",
   "propositionFidelity": "hash-verified",
   "scopeMatch": "bounded-match",
   "evidenceSufficiency": "abstract-sufficient-only-for-explicit-bounded-comparison",
   "mappingAmbiguous": [
    "kaal:claim:4015908-035",
    "auction design for agent-mediated resource allocation",
    "auction design resolves multi-agent allocation problems",
    "a fair-launch token auction addresses underpricing and whale manipulation"
   ],
   "rationale": "Independent substantive review found a bounded comparison concerning auction design for agent-mediated resource allocation. The external proposition expressly states auction design resolves multi-agent allocation problems; the protected Kaal claim expressly states a fair-launch token auction addresses underpricing and whale manipulation. The reviewed response quotes both propositions, labels the mapping ambiguous, and does not infer agreement, causation, empirical support, or equivalence.",
   "limitations": [
    "Crossref abstract-indexed proposition only; full text not independently reviewed.",
    "Ambiguity is preserved because the review supports comparison, not equivalence or endorsement."
   ],
   "priorReviewRecordSha256": "bfd9299fcdc18b1b75cdbba99341795603e89d8c07d0a3f315e5a7dfb101d00c"
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm reviewed batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0011-reviewed-v3, SHA-256 2630781aba28de980ff48a84aafcbe0fd0db750ec91b2f354b50eae4c9edaab4, as substantively reviewed and authorize publication of all 23 retained response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence limitations, ambiguity labels, provenance, append-only review ledger, original candidate identities, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "41d7518e77b995073a10ced18ba5a96a132f09667e7dee05494c1616d0b5d60b"
}