{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7916",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-7916",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Updated Delegated Proof Of Stake And Nash Equilibrium A Mining Pool Game 4456A32460",
 "text": "Updated delegated proof of stake and Nash equilibrium : A mining pool game model for blockchain network states the retrieved proposition: Since there are 30 consensus techniques like proof of stake, delegated proof of stake, and proof of work, and so forth in the previous years, the operating efficiency, safety, and stability still lag behind the basic requirements. Kaal's protected corpus separately states: Existing blockchains and DAOs still lack genuine decentralization, and there are currently no true DAOs: Bitcoin's proof of work protocol has produced mining pools because of economies of scale and unbalanced reward structures. The defensible response is a qualification limited to the shared issue identified in the review rationale. This abstract-level comparison does not establish broader agreement, causation, empirical support, or equivalence.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "blockchain",
  "dao",
  "decentralization",
  "consensus-and-security",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.3627.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation.",
  "Crossref abstract-indexed proposition only; full text not independently reviewed.",
  "Ambiguity is preserved because the review supports comparison, not equivalence or endorsement."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Updated delegated proof of stake and Nash equilibrium : A mining pool game model for blockchain network",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.8224"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:3227967-032",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227967-032",
  "citation": "Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in a Digital Age Why 'Coding for Lawyers' Matters (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227967",
  "paper": "Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in a Digital Age Why 'Coding for Lawyers' Matters",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2018",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227967",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "f6e13b956f864ab32ec3305d095a35a127770327d75b3688f785cefc437d369f"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227967-032"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Updated delegated proof of stake and Nash equilibrium : A mining pool game model for blockchain network",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.8224"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0011-reviewed-v3",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7916",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7916.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:50d7477f6cb029001d96",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.3627,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Independent substantive review found a bounded comparison concerning proof-of-stake decentralization and mining concentration. The external proposition expressly states PoS, DPoS, and PoW continue to lag security and stability requirements; the protected Kaal claim expressly states PoW mining pools and unbalanced rewards undermine genuine decentralization. The reviewed response quotes both propositions, labels the mapping ambiguous, and does not infer agreement, causation, empirical support, or equivalence.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.1002/cpe.8224",
  "queryId": "concept:4eef884d0548",
  "queryText": "agent identity delegated authority",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.8224",
  "doi": "10.1002/cpe.8224",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.1002/cpe.8224",
   "Crossref": "10.1002/cpe.8224"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T21:49:59.921Z",
  "providerPage": 23,
  "rawObservationSha256": "4a74dd6e0f97fbb5241e57b50bb108d2c011e2f093166c7b02ec98415be422d1",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "975912f7dd72e5c62893d0e1a1041a9a4b59b1ceef8ab6faff0b1e9775edcbee",
  "inputLine": 30583,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00045",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.1002/cpe.8224",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Namratha M",
   "Kunwar Singh"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2024-10-25",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.1002/cpe.8224",
   "crossref:10.1002/cpe.8224",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.8224",
   "title:4725f279a29e1b39c6017772",
   "proposition:e7f99c63e4afdb84d538aacaeca3825648056e4fce60d7b2a88af0814bb07463"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Since there are 30 consensus techniques like proof of stake, delegated proof of stake, and proof of work, and so forth in the previous years, the operating efficiency, safety, and stability still lag behind the basic requirements.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "e04ef4f84d9f3d963e1534c890ffbb59366cb5d0a084cbbcae5778ee620e4f21",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 2,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3227967-032",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227967-032",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.3627,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: proof, mining, blockchain, consensus, work, still. Scope: proof of work blockchains as of 2018.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3125827-040",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3125827-040",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3473,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: proof, stake, blockchain, network, consensus, work. Scope: new users joining without prior knowledge of the genuine chain; PoS chains where clone creation costs only new public keys.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3782198-032",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782198-032",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3223,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: proof, stake, blockchain, network, consensus. Scope: applies to proof of stake designs that select block producers pseudorandomly.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3782198-033",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782198-033",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.3223,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: proof, stake, blockchain, network, consensus. Scope: applies to blockchains that require full history verification.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3808859-039",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3808859-039",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3187,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: proof, blockchain, consensus, work, requirements. Scope: stated as the requirement for technological decentralization via blockchain.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-substantive-review-v2-manual-adjudication",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-07-31T22:08:42.497Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex substantive evidence review with manual adjudication",
   "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:50d7477f6cb029001d96",
   "originalBatchId": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0011",
   "reviewedBatchId": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0011-reviewed-v3",
   "originalRecordSha256": "bb0975b78b3ddf8464ccc56998d1f185bcff1c052c95acd3bb93186263e92d48",
   "propositionSha256": "e04ef4f84d9f3d963e1534c890ffbb59366cb5d0a084cbbcae5778ee620e4f21",
   "sourceRecordId": "10.1002/cpe.8224",
   "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
   "priorReviewDisposition": "retained",
   "finalDisposition": "retained",
   "originalPrimaryClaimId": "kaal:claim:3227967-032",
   "reviewedPrimaryClaimId": "kaal:claim:3227967-032",
   "mappingAction": "primary-mapping-confirmed",
   "relevance": "bounded-domain-specific-relevance",
   "propositionFidelity": "hash-verified",
   "scopeMatch": "bounded-match",
   "evidenceSufficiency": "abstract-sufficient-only-for-explicit-bounded-comparison",
   "mappingAmbiguous": [
    "kaal:claim:3227967-032",
    "proof-of-stake decentralization and mining concentration",
    "PoS, DPoS, and PoW continue to lag security and stability requirements",
    "PoW mining pools and unbalanced rewards undermine genuine decentralization"
   ],
   "rationale": "Independent substantive review found a bounded comparison concerning proof-of-stake decentralization and mining concentration. The external proposition expressly states PoS, DPoS, and PoW continue to lag security and stability requirements; the protected Kaal claim expressly states PoW mining pools and unbalanced rewards undermine genuine decentralization. The reviewed response quotes both propositions, labels the mapping ambiguous, and does not infer agreement, causation, empirical support, or equivalence.",
   "limitations": [
    "Crossref abstract-indexed proposition only; full text not independently reviewed.",
    "Ambiguity is preserved because the review supports comparison, not equivalence or endorsement."
   ],
   "priorReviewRecordSha256": "3cb97e49c35993f5624868fd8225dbb9a193335b1fa730f3508ac2c0e7c2b6f7"
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm reviewed batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0011-reviewed-v3, SHA-256 2630781aba28de980ff48a84aafcbe0fd0db750ec91b2f354b50eae4c9edaab4, as substantively reviewed and authorize publication of all 23 retained response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence limitations, ambiguity labels, provenance, append-only review ledger, original candidate identities, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "0e09f39186b33c31b894b599fc055b07fb95fb21dfe7c9abb109e93f72449f83"
}