{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7919",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-7919",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Apparent Authority C0Bb4Bac36",
 "text": "Apparent Authority states the retrieved proposition: It describes actual authority as a legal relationship between principal and agent that is created by a consensual agreement to which they alone are parties. Kaal's protected corpus separately states: Analyzing executive compensation as a single contract between an executive agent and a corporate principal fails, because it ignores the informal relational element of the principal agent relationship that often overshadows the legal terms of the agreement. The defensible response is a qualification limited to the shared issue identified in the review rationale. This abstract-level comparison does not establish broader agreement, causation, empirical support, or equivalence.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "ai-and-agents",
  "corporate-governance",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.3849.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation.",
  "Crossref abstract-indexed proposition only; full text not independently reviewed.",
  "Ambiguity is preserved because the review supports comparison, not equivalence or endorsement."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Apparent Authority",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780192856197.003.0004"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:2097160-006",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2097160-006",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Contingent Capital in Executive Compensation (2012). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2097160",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Contingent Capital in Executive Compensation",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2012",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=2097160",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "1e1f8aa246bce19f4658dbceb455c7c2a272aa5d63a9e9bdaa46a3a5a87680fc"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2097160-006"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Apparent Authority",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780192856197.003.0004"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0011-reviewed-v3",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7919",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7919.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:5ca9a9e546fdd4604de4",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.3849,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Independent substantive review found a bounded comparison concerning legal and relational dimensions of principal-agent authority. The external proposition expressly states actual authority is a consensual legal relationship between principal and agent; the protected Kaal claim expressly states a purely contractual executive-principal model misses the relational dimension of agency. The reviewed response quotes both propositions, labels the mapping ambiguous, and does not infer agreement, causation, empirical support, or equivalence.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.1093/law/9780192856197.003.0004",
  "queryId": "concept:4eef884d0548",
  "queryText": "agent identity delegated authority",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780192856197.003.0004",
  "doi": "10.1093/law/9780192856197.003.0004",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.1093/law/9780192856197.003.0004",
   "Crossref": "10.1093/law/9780192856197.003.0004"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T21:50:12.159Z",
  "providerPage": 55,
  "rawObservationSha256": "ca60832becbd5343eac38c09744f9efb006f99a57ed287c715337002e89457ea",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "975912f7dd72e5c62893d0e1a1041a9a4b59b1ceef8ab6faff0b1e9775edcbee",
  "inputLine": 38679,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00078",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.1093/law/9780192856197.003.0004",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Roderick Munday"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2022-02-11",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.1093/law/9780192856197.003.0004",
   "crossref:10.1093/law/9780192856197.003.0004",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780192856197.003.0004",
   "title:72c8dcfd8b99811d98b97cdd",
   "proposition:61bc81a029e79a906fc3d47ab345b30761643de8b5794072ae4c0b1b8c5007b4"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "It describes actual authority as a legal relationship between principal and agent that is created by a consensual agreement to which they alone are parties.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "57d8f96aa1b2e2a799beaef6789e0dffb5def551eabdfd9104bb33f79dded84e",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 0,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2097160-006",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2097160-006",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.3849,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: legal, relationship, between, principal, agent, agreement. Scope: executive compensation contracts; classical contract model or spot contract model.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:1428387-024",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1428387-024",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.2749,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: relationship, between, principal, agent. Scope: under the issuer-pays rating model for CDOs.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3373393-018",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3373393-018",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.2749,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: relationship, between, principal, agent. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3373393-020",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3373393-020",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.2589,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: between, principal, agent, parties. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2939127-026",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2939127-026",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.233,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: legal, between, agreement, parties. Scope: smart contracts assessed under existing contract law doctrine.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-substantive-review-v2-manual-adjudication",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-07-31T22:08:42.497Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex substantive evidence review with manual adjudication",
   "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:5ca9a9e546fdd4604de4",
   "originalBatchId": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0011",
   "reviewedBatchId": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0011-reviewed-v3",
   "originalRecordSha256": "2136c8ec9bdc9f1fc780bfc2d1b1d879c53f6fd2a0ffcb902a0293e6556ef3c6",
   "propositionSha256": "57d8f96aa1b2e2a799beaef6789e0dffb5def551eabdfd9104bb33f79dded84e",
   "sourceRecordId": "10.1093/law/9780192856197.003.0004",
   "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
   "priorReviewDisposition": "withheld",
   "finalDisposition": "retained",
   "originalPrimaryClaimId": "kaal:claim:2097160-006",
   "reviewedPrimaryClaimId": "kaal:claim:2097160-006",
   "mappingAction": "primary-mapping-confirmed",
   "relevance": "bounded-domain-specific-relevance",
   "propositionFidelity": "hash-verified",
   "scopeMatch": "bounded-match",
   "evidenceSufficiency": "abstract-sufficient-only-for-explicit-bounded-comparison",
   "mappingAmbiguous": [
    "kaal:claim:2097160-006",
    "legal and relational dimensions of principal-agent authority",
    "actual authority is a consensual legal relationship between principal and agent",
    "a purely contractual executive-principal model misses the relational dimension of agency"
   ],
   "rationale": "Independent substantive review found a bounded comparison concerning legal and relational dimensions of principal-agent authority. The external proposition expressly states actual authority is a consensual legal relationship between principal and agent; the protected Kaal claim expressly states a purely contractual executive-principal model misses the relational dimension of agency. The reviewed response quotes both propositions, labels the mapping ambiguous, and does not infer agreement, causation, empirical support, or equivalence.",
   "limitations": [
    "Crossref abstract-indexed proposition only; full text not independently reviewed.",
    "Ambiguity is preserved because the review supports comparison, not equivalence or endorsement."
   ],
   "priorReviewRecordSha256": "df37f0bb2722b65dfb16bfecbc46d5a79eaf8670635118713c15bef0b2c34893"
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm reviewed batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0011-reviewed-v3, SHA-256 2630781aba28de980ff48a84aafcbe0fd0db750ec91b2f354b50eae4c9edaab4, as substantively reviewed and authorize publication of all 23 retained response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence limitations, ambiguity labels, provenance, append-only review ledger, original candidate identities, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "4e53d6fdc0bfb7133f31c9dae42e1800486e7327e656fb4ca0b48b7281a909e3"
}