{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7920",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-7920",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming 7 Principal And Agent A94F23Dfe8",
 "text": "7. Principal and agent states the retrieved proposition: Principals and agents have certain rights against each other which spring from their agency relationship, most of which may be contractual. Kaal's protected corpus separately states: Blockchain provides an alternative governance mechanism that eliminates agency costs, meaning the principal's cost of supervising agents, by creating trust in the contractual relationship between principal and agent. The defensible response is a qualification limited to the shared issue identified in the review rationale. This abstract-level comparison does not establish broader agreement, causation, empirical support, or equivalence.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "blockchain",
  "corporate-governance",
  "reputation",
  "governance-design",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.4833.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation.",
  "Crossref abstract-indexed proposition only; full text not independently reviewed.",
  "Ambiguity is preserved because the review supports comparison, not equivalence or endorsement."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "7. Principal and agent",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199284481.003.0007"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:3373393-018",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3373393-018",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Blockchain Solutions for Agency Problems in Corporate Governance (2019). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3373393",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Blockchain Solutions for Agency Problems in Corporate Governance",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2019",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=3373393",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "4d1424b9ba9aff8a61bc7a0dddd02cded93785e5843685dde76c07dcdb23961e"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3373393-018"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "7. Principal and agent",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199284481.003.0007"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0011-reviewed-v3",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7920",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7920.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:425a6c0bc8ed4b1b96bd",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.4833,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Independent substantive review found a bounded comparison concerning contractual principal-agent governance. The external proposition expressly states principal-agent rights arise from contractual agency relationships; the protected Kaal claim expressly states blockchain governance changes principal monitoring costs through contractual trust. The reviewed response quotes both propositions, labels the mapping ambiguous, and does not infer agreement, causation, empirical support, or equivalence.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.1093/he/9780199284481.003.0007",
  "queryId": "concept:4eef884d0548",
  "queryText": "agent identity delegated authority",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199284481.003.0007",
  "doi": "10.1093/he/9780199284481.003.0007",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.1093/he/9780199284481.003.0007",
   "Crossref": "10.1093/he/9780199284481.003.0007"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T21:50:26.428Z",
  "providerPage": 96,
  "rawObservationSha256": "ba78093759eee2ce6f31f7d3b7caecd710051d40ced74ec3ea4a7f5e98117cca",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "975912f7dd72e5c62893d0e1a1041a9a4b59b1ceef8ab6faff0b1e9775edcbee",
  "inputLine": 48779,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00118",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.1093/he/9780199284481.003.0007",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Reza Beheshti",
   "Séverine Saintier",
   "Sean Thomas"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2024-05-17",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.1093/he/9780199284481.003.0007",
   "crossref:10.1093/he/9780199284481.003.0007",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199284481.003.0007",
   "title:19835260b0daf9d53ea74944",
   "proposition:d47d2a37b2dd19fab5f21d3f4c9b9ccaaadc788fa5469ebc2ab15f28e2ee2f88"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Principals and agents have certain rights against each other which spring from their agency relationship, most of which may be contractual.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "7fb7aef85ff4337cd18508c18b434e9e700b6c9def520e0cca8ec31cee30cb07",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 2,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3373393-018",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3373393-018",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.4833,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: principal, agent, agents, agency, relationship, contractual. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:1428387-023",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1428387-023",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.4372,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: principal, agent, have, other, agency, relationship. Scope: under the issuer-pays model for structured finance ratings.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3373393-019",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3373393-019",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.4198,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: principals, agents, agency, relationship, contractual. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3373393-038",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3373393-038",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.4198,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: principals, agents, agency, relationship, contractual. Scope: complex agency relationships.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:1428387-021",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1428387-021",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.4168,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: principal, agent, principals, agents, agency. Scope: in banks and large institutions trading complex financial products.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-substantive-review-v2-manual-adjudication",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-07-31T22:08:42.497Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex substantive evidence review with manual adjudication",
   "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:425a6c0bc8ed4b1b96bd",
   "originalBatchId": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0011",
   "reviewedBatchId": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0011-reviewed-v3",
   "originalRecordSha256": "4716d619ae765500f61b43b3a5b59b67c0969900d174bd2da4e1bb5ba8d57e3d",
   "propositionSha256": "7fb7aef85ff4337cd18508c18b434e9e700b6c9def520e0cca8ec31cee30cb07",
   "sourceRecordId": "10.1093/he/9780199284481.003.0007",
   "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
   "priorReviewDisposition": "withheld",
   "finalDisposition": "retained",
   "originalPrimaryClaimId": "kaal:claim:3373393-018",
   "reviewedPrimaryClaimId": "kaal:claim:3373393-018",
   "mappingAction": "primary-mapping-confirmed",
   "relevance": "bounded-domain-specific-relevance",
   "propositionFidelity": "hash-verified",
   "scopeMatch": "bounded-match",
   "evidenceSufficiency": "abstract-sufficient-only-for-explicit-bounded-comparison",
   "mappingAmbiguous": [
    "kaal:claim:3373393-018",
    "contractual principal-agent governance",
    "principal-agent rights arise from contractual agency relationships",
    "blockchain governance changes principal monitoring costs through contractual trust"
   ],
   "rationale": "Independent substantive review found a bounded comparison concerning contractual principal-agent governance. The external proposition expressly states principal-agent rights arise from contractual agency relationships; the protected Kaal claim expressly states blockchain governance changes principal monitoring costs through contractual trust. The reviewed response quotes both propositions, labels the mapping ambiguous, and does not infer agreement, causation, empirical support, or equivalence.",
   "limitations": [
    "Crossref abstract-indexed proposition only; full text not independently reviewed.",
    "Ambiguity is preserved because the review supports comparison, not equivalence or endorsement."
   ],
   "priorReviewRecordSha256": "459964fc6b8c3b470ca3acd7888d617f503d72762fd0e9e6e8ed4669192460e8"
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm reviewed batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0011-reviewed-v3, SHA-256 2630781aba28de980ff48a84aafcbe0fd0db750ec91b2f354b50eae4c9edaab4, as substantively reviewed and authorize publication of all 23 retained response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence limitations, ambiguity labels, provenance, append-only review ledger, original candidate identities, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "bcd31e48f3be29cf52b121d266e0861b75e961dda1eda026c80a2973d2e99b1d"
}
