Qualification: Toward a Multidimensional Conceptualization of Decentralization in Blockchain Governance: Commentary on “Two Sides of the Same Coin? Decentralized versus Proprietary Blockchains and the Performance of Digital Currencies” by Cennamo, Marchesi, and Meyer
Toward a Multidimensional Conceptualization of Decentralization in Blockchain Governance: Commentary on “Two Sides of the Same Coin? Decentralized versus Proprietary Blockchains and the Performance of Digital Currencies” by Cennamo, Marchesi, and Meyer should be assessed against Kaal's source-bound claim that Decentralized networks depend on dynamic governance because evolving blockchain protocols require updates, and the practice of hardforking that remained prevalent in the early 2020s created significant economic loss for such blockchains. The current metadata indicates a plausible connection through blockchain governance, but the defensible response is a qualification until the source text confirms agreement, scope, methods, and limitations.
blockchaingovernance-designconsensus-and-securityeconomics