{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-02-002",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-02-002",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Introduction Ai And Change 34D32C2133",
 "text": "Maas independently supports the pacing premise in Kaal's critique of static AI-governance frameworks. The chapter's central thesis is that global AI-governance architectures must adapt so they remain robust to ongoing and future changes in technology, law, and international politics. This aligns with Kaal's claim that predefined rules cannot keep pace with AI development, while Maas states the adaptive prescription rather than directly measuring the failure of static frameworks.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-02",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-02",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "governance-design",
  "ai-and-agents",
  "dynamic-regulation",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.1849.",
  "The primary mapping cleared the automated ambiguity test; substantive scope remains review-bound.",
  "Evidence is abstract indexed.",
  "The external source states an adaptive prescription; it does not directly measure failure of static frameworks."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Introduction: AI and Change",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/9780191988455.003.0001"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:4796714-001",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4796714-001",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, AI Governance (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4796714",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, AI Governance",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2024",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=4796714",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "59fa63bae179e8f9b6b8efbdf90cee28400276512a1b04f9f579a48641305c93"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4796714-001"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Introduction: AI and Change",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/9780191988455.003.0001"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-02:global-remap-0001",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-02-002",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-02-002.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-08-01:4e36ebb1aa4a3f96d7af",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.1849,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "global 5,033-claim remap plus source-level mechanism and scope adjudication",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Same pacing-driven adaptivity rule within the compatible scope of AI-governance architectures responding to technological change.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.1093/9780191988455.003.0001",
  "queryText": "AI agent governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1093/9780191988455.003.0001",
  "doi": "10.1093/9780191988455.003.0001",
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T20:34:01.015Z",
  "identityVerifiedAt": "2026-08-02T20:01:31Z",
  "identityVerification": "Crossref REST work record",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.1093/9780191988455.003.0001",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Matthijs M. Maas"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2025-10-30",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.1093/9780191988455.003.0001",
   "crossref:10.1093/9780191988455.003.0001",
   "proposition:1ab33863dbf4c3fd99750c5ce46d0c7fb3fd32950e77beabfe122e9ee6b81205"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "It presents the book’s central thesis: that we can and must choose to adapt our global governance architectures for AI in a manner that is more robust to ongoing and future changes in AI technology, in law, and in international politics.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "1ab33863dbf4c3fd99750c5ce46d0c7fb3fd32950e77beabfe122e9ee6b81205",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 4,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:4796714-001",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4796714-001",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.1849,
    "method": "global 5,033-claim remap plus source-level mechanism and scope adjudication",
    "whyRelevant": "Both sources state the same AI-governance pacing rule: governance must be adaptive because technological change outpaces static frameworks. Maas states the prescriptive corollary; Kaal states the diagnostic failure mechanism.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "disposition": "retained",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-02T20:16:00Z",
   "rationale": "Same pacing-driven adaptivity rule within the compatible scope of AI-governance architectures responding to technological change.",
   "limitations": [
    "Evidence is abstract indexed.",
    "The external source states an adaptive prescription; it does not directly measure failure of static frameworks."
   ]
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Standing authority receipt e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1 authorizes automatic publication of this nonempty defensible substantively reviewed batch on the canonical property while preserving the exact 5,033 protected claims.",
 "sha256": "2c70bf73a439f05fca76893cf4ab1c4501659b27528b4921e1d70bfc2138207c"
}