{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-029",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-029",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Reputation And Gossip In Game Theory Efe012A96C",
 "text": "Reputation and Gossip in Game Theory independently states that past behavior can qualify an actor for reward and cooperation or for punishment and revenge. This supports the durable-record incentive mechanism in Kaal's reputation-governance claim. The source does not independently establish non-fungibility, DAO scope, or a positive-sum outcome, so the correspondence is limited to the incentive mechanism.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "reputation",
  "governance-design",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.62.",
  "The primary mapping cleared the automated ambiguity test; substantive scope remains review-bound.",
  "Evidence is limited to an indexed Crossref abstract proposition; full text was not reviewed in this run.",
  "The retained relationship is limited to the source-stated mechanism and does not imply external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of the broader Kaal claim.",
  "The source states that past behavior can qualify an actor for reward, cooperation, punishment, or revenge. This supports the durable-record incentive mechanism in Kaal's reputation-governance claim, but it does not independently establish non-fungibility, DAO scope, or a positive-sum outcome."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Reputation and Gossip in Game Theory",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190494087.013.12"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:3799320-032",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3799320-032",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, A Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) of DAOs (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3799320",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, A Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) of DAOs",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2021",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=3799320",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "c3dff852f2d3f04718c829a24189309a7db4d92d84f6045d3d4f562d87c03e63"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3799320-032"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Reputation and Gossip in Game Theory",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190494087.013.12"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-08:continuous-crossref-0004-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-029",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-029.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-08-08:0ba4ded07cdba5edeee0",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.62,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source states that past behavior can qualify an actor for reward, cooperation, punishment, or revenge. This supports the durable-record incentive mechanism in Kaal's reputation-governance claim, but it does not independently establish non-fungibility, DAO scope, or a positive-sum outcome.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190494087.013.12",
  "queryId": "concept:025f78810d99",
  "queryText": "agent reputation standing",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190494087.013.12",
  "doi": "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190494087.013.12",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190494087.013.12",
   "Crossref": "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190494087.013.12"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-09T01:06:08.516Z",
  "providerPage": 2,
  "rawObservationSha256": "7caf55d145bca44680d1f7b4a02568560e3b7abd8b22c788ae9820a82845df6a",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "73e6dc27c805ba51e8d2d96f86c087621780a8e1d472e7020ed1bb34b0ea06f3",
  "inputLine": 1818,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00002",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190494087.013.12",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Charles Roddie"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2019-08-22",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190494087.013.12",
   "crossref:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190494087.013.12",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190494087.013.12",
   "title:c137fb7801d387b09e6fea78",
   "proposition:aba1e3816fac4ad42e8351fc807d8ed8fc608a690d3163d52967f593b26169ed"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "A second reason is that their past behavior may have qualified them for reward and cooperation, or for punishment and revenge.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "71129fb8c54f44ef093e9aaa407520083071d9c0dd7928c25af5660c202bbb14",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 2,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3799320-032",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3799320-032",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.62,
    "method": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
    "whyRelevant": "The source states that past behavior can qualify an actor for reward, cooperation, punishment, or revenge. This supports the durable-record incentive mechanism in Kaal's reputation-governance claim, but it does not independently establish non-fungibility, DAO scope, or a positive-sum outcome.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "disposition": "retained",
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-continuous-crossref-substantive-review-v1",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-09T01:10:42.034Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex continuous substantive reviewer",
   "rationale": "The source states that past behavior can qualify an actor for reward, cooperation, punishment, or revenge. This supports the durable-record incentive mechanism in Kaal's reputation-governance claim, but it does not independently establish non-fungibility, DAO scope, or a positive-sum outcome.",
   "limitations": [
    "Evidence is limited to an indexed Crossref abstract proposition; full text was not reviewed in this run.",
    "The retained relationship is limited to the source-stated mechanism and does not imply external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of the broader Kaal claim.",
    "The source states that past behavior can qualify an actor for reward, cooperation, punishment, or revenge. This supports the durable-record incentive mechanism in Kaal's reputation-governance claim, but it does not independently establish non-fungibility, DAO scope, or a positive-sum outcome."
   ],
   "sourceIdentity": {
    "status": "verified",
    "source": "Crossref REST work record",
    "doi": "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190494087.013.12",
    "title": "Reputation and Gossip in Game Theory",
    "language": "en",
    "publisher": "Oxford University Press",
    "checkedAt": "2026-08-09T01:10:42.034Z",
    "responseBodySha256": "a3c345263b85c171c8c93ea5b58733e0b0c1e0a770488b7a0e1804246958c505",
    "providerReceipt": {
     "path": "outputs/historical-backfill-2026-08-08-crossref/raw-receipts/crossref-004-00002.json",
     "sha256": "9e1f675bdf2fb45688bfb8c9c3e5259e86d4223f50ba03f89a11a485ae867efd",
     "byteLength": 1884035
    }
   },
   "independentRationale": "The exact proposition is present in the live Crossref abstract and the deposited reference list contains no Kaal-authored reference; the relationship is limited to the independently stated proposition.",
   "nonOverlap": {
    "candidateIdMatches": 0,
    "canonicalUrlMatches": 0,
    "propositionHashMatches": 0
   }
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed batch and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "a56eeff1f50f53806bde850cafcb4573bfce5c5d3f6a488ae100dac336bd84a1"
}