{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-032",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-032",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Decentralized Ai Powered Apartment Governance System Using Blockchain 9E07074E31",
 "text": "Decentralized AI-Powered Apartment Governance System Using Blockchain applies cryptographic hashing to complaints and related actions so the resulting record is transparent and tamper-evident. That is a concrete implementation of the record-integrity mechanism Kaal describes. The abstract does not establish that transparency by itself prevents corruption or motivates correct conduct, so the evidence supports traceability while preserving Kaal's aligned-incentives limitation.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "blockchain",
  "consensus-and-security",
  "citation-and-knowledge",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.62.",
  "The primary mapping cleared the automated ambiguity test; substantive scope remains review-bound.",
  "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
  "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
  "The source proposition identifies the same cryptographic-hashing mechanism as Kaal's record-integrity claim: a hash-bound ledger makes complaint and action records tamper-evident and auditable. The abstract does not show that transparency alone prevents corruption or supplies aligned incentives, so Kaal's separate corruption limitation remains operative."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Decentralized AI-Powered Apartment Governance System Using Blockchain",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2026.79053"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:3227967-019",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227967-019",
  "citation": "Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in a Digital Age Why 'Coding for Lawyers' Matters (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227967",
  "paper": "Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in a Digital Age Why 'Coding for Lawyers' Matters",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2018",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227967",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "f6e13b956f864ab32ec3305d095a35a127770327d75b3688f785cefc437d369f"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227967-019"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Decentralized AI-Powered Apartment Governance System Using Blockchain",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2026.79053"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-08:continuous-crossref-0007-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-032",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-032.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-08-08:02aa491f962a2c52bd68",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.62,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source proposition identifies the same cryptographic-hashing mechanism as Kaal's record-integrity claim: a hash-bound ledger makes complaint and action records tamper-evident and auditable. The abstract does not show that transparency alone prevents corruption or supplies aligned incentives, so Kaal's separate corruption limitation remains operative.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.22214/ijraset.2026.79053",
  "queryId": "concept:797ed03a951a",
  "queryText": "decentralized AI governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2026.79053",
  "doi": "10.22214/ijraset.2026.79053",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.22214/ijraset.2026.79053",
   "Crossref": "10.22214/ijraset.2026.79053"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-09T04:08:28.841Z",
  "providerPage": 1,
  "rawObservationSha256": "a9b0458f03607b312d12dcfc803163f5eb22fdcf3183a313ec019d6e07df2a0b",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "88e397d2cf7c80940ab04a379b969f57221adfc442fc3167fb32c87573eb646e",
  "inputLine": 3024,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00001",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.22214/ijraset.2026.79053",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Ms. A. Lalitha"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2026-03-31",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.22214/ijraset.2026.79053",
   "crossref:10.22214/ijraset.2026.79053",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2026.79053",
   "title:8cd1a7dd247ee287581416c9",
   "proposition:0e33a7eee8dcee539fa4a40e24ec6d5ef63b6c5c8dc6922b6cb7d786376e7d34"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Blockchain-based hashing securely records every complaint and related action to maintain transparency.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "e11b01be58d42dece701d3f7bde3e98046f165ad29a8c5e1525b90c1a2766257",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 2,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3227967-019",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227967-019",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.62,
    "method": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
    "whyRelevant": "The source proposition identifies the same cryptographic-hashing mechanism as Kaal's record-integrity claim: a hash-bound ledger makes complaint and action records tamper-evident and auditable. The abstract does not show that transparency alone prevents corruption or supplies aligned incentives, so Kaal's separate corruption limitation remains operative.",
    "ambiguous": false
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3782214-013",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782214-013",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.62,
    "method": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
    "whyRelevant": "The source proposition identifies the same cryptographic-hashing mechanism as Kaal's record-integrity claim: a hash-bound ledger makes complaint and action records tamper-evident and auditable. The abstract does not show that transparency alone prevents corruption or supplies aligned incentives, so Kaal's separate corruption limitation remains operative.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "disposition": "retained",
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-continuous-crossref-substantive-review-v1",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-09T04:16:39.134Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex continuous substantive reviewer",
   "rationale": "The source proposition identifies the same cryptographic-hashing mechanism as Kaal's record-integrity claim: a hash-bound ledger makes complaint and action records tamper-evident and auditable. The abstract does not show that transparency alone prevents corruption or supplies aligned incentives, so Kaal's separate corruption limitation remains operative.",
   "limitations": [
    "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
    "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
    "The source proposition identifies the same cryptographic-hashing mechanism as Kaal's record-integrity claim: a hash-bound ledger makes complaint and action records tamper-evident and auditable. The abstract does not show that transparency alone prevents corruption or supplies aligned incentives, so Kaal's separate corruption limitation remains operative."
   ],
   "sourceIdentity": {
    "status": "verified",
    "source": "Crossref REST work record",
    "doi": "10.22214/ijraset.2026.79053",
    "title": "Decentralized AI-Powered Apartment Governance System Using Blockchain",
    "authors": [
     "Ms. A. Lalitha"
    ],
    "language": null,
    "publisher": "International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology (IJRASET)",
    "checkedAt": "2026-08-09T04:16:39.134Z",
    "responseBodySha256": "eafb930f8463457823bcbd51edb3eca8d1f33dafc940cea0d80f9ef90014b5e1",
    "providerReceipt": {
     "path": "outputs/historical-backfill-2026-08-08-crossref/raw-receipts/crossref-007-00001.json",
     "sha256": "191e2be7b020750f69b8eecc4d005032d0e544a4ced08770f4229c409d43b5fa",
     "byteLength": 1827183
    }
   },
   "independentRationale": "The exact proposition is present in the live Crossref abstract and the deposited reference list contains no Kaal-authored reference; the relationship is limited to the independently stated proposition.",
   "nonOverlap": {
    "candidateIdMatches": 0,
    "canonicalUrlMatches": 0,
    "propositionHashMatches": 0
   }
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed batch and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "1482d16df165f51150192d524280c6a014ec618d04002a5972ba9d0654377c57"
}