{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-049",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-049",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Artificial Intelligence Regulation Approaches And Implications D28Af22Ee5",
 "text": "Artificial Intelligence Regulation: Approaches and Implications argues that rapidly evolving AI technology and threats require specifically adapted regulation. This supports the pacing diagnosis in Kaal's claim that static frameworks cannot keep pace with technological innovation. It does not establish that dynamic autonomous governance is the necessary remedy, and the abstract supplies no comparative evidence about centralized and decentralized approaches.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "dynamic-regulation",
  "governance-design",
  "innovation",
  "decentralization",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.62.",
  "The primary mapping cleared the automated ambiguity test; substantive scope remains review-bound.",
  "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
  "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
  "The source identifies rapidly evolving AI technology and threats as creating a need for specifically adapted regulation. That is a direct pacing-mechanism correspondence to Kaal's claim that static regulation cannot keep pace, but the proposition calls for adapted regulation and does not establish Kaal's remedy of dynamic autonomous governance."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Artificial Intelligence Regulation: Approaches and Implications",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.62768/adjuris/2024/1/10"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:6192998-003",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/6192998-003",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Evolution of Domain-Specific Reputation Systems From Binary Validation to Citation-Weighted Knowledge Attribution (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6192998",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Evolution of Domain-Specific Reputation Systems From Binary Validation to Citation-Weighted Knowledge Attribution",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2026",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=6192998",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "b04292561ee041e0c9eaa7eca28a410ed440e76a95743a539361a3f76c97f2b3"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/6192998-003"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Artificial Intelligence Regulation: Approaches and Implications",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.62768/adjuris/2024/1/10"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-08:continuous-crossref-0009-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-049",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-049.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-08-08:8e8895014af41d3f9079",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.62,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source identifies rapidly evolving AI technology and threats as creating a need for specifically adapted regulation. That is a direct pacing-mechanism correspondence to Kaal's claim that static regulation cannot keep pace, but the proposition calls for adapted regulation and does not establish Kaal's remedy of dynamic autonomous governance.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.62768/adjuris/2024/1/10",
  "queryId": "concept:a54213db0234",
  "queryText": "dynamic regulation artificial intelligence",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.62768/adjuris/2024/1/10",
  "doi": "10.62768/adjuris/2024/1/10",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.62768/adjuris/2024/1/10",
   "Crossref": "10.62768/adjuris/2024/1/10"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-09T06:09:20.786Z",
  "providerPage": 1,
  "rawObservationSha256": "54f196e0832094fb3e8382ef158497ab643b046519a13c985cf84ce34dd9d909",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "130acb1a5a5ce19ca8e5c3a475d60ddb7c61c85f9fe7a60371ef6881f80ff085",
  "inputLine": 4058,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00001",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.62768/adjuris/2024/1/10",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Gabriel Niță"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2024-05-20",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.62768/adjuris/2024/1/10",
   "crossref:10.62768/adjuris/2024/1/10",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.62768/adjuris/2024/1/10",
   "title:51e074f6d01acae0e840cc76",
   "proposition:a7c558a3116543fbbd49c867604eb65a8dc8fe4a3b7f98c6efbaa49110c8c747"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "The complexity of technological risks and cyber security risks with a major significant impact on fundamental rights and freedoms arising from the adoption of new artificial intelligence technologies calls for the implementation of specific regulations adapted to the rapid pace of technological innovation and the continuous evolution of threats in this area.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "464f26b0604e9a383ed49516153e1f838164bd1200a4acd3794ad9a45800f0ff",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 0,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:6192998-003",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/6192998-003",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.62,
    "method": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
    "whyRelevant": "The source identifies rapidly evolving AI technology and threats as creating a need for specifically adapted regulation. That is a direct pacing-mechanism correspondence to Kaal's claim that static regulation cannot keep pace, but the proposition calls for adapted regulation and does not establish Kaal's remedy of dynamic autonomous governance.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "disposition": "retained",
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-continuous-crossref-substantive-review-v1",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-09T06:13:44.631Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex continuous substantive reviewer",
   "rationale": "The source identifies rapidly evolving AI technology and threats as creating a need for specifically adapted regulation. That is a direct pacing-mechanism correspondence to Kaal's claim that static regulation cannot keep pace, but the proposition calls for adapted regulation and does not establish Kaal's remedy of dynamic autonomous governance.",
   "limitations": [
    "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
    "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
    "The source identifies rapidly evolving AI technology and threats as creating a need for specifically adapted regulation. That is a direct pacing-mechanism correspondence to Kaal's claim that static regulation cannot keep pace, but the proposition calls for adapted regulation and does not establish Kaal's remedy of dynamic autonomous governance."
   ],
   "sourceIdentity": {
    "status": "verified",
    "source": "Crossref REST work record",
    "doi": "10.62768/adjuris/2024/1/10",
    "title": "Artificial Intelligence Regulation: Approaches and Implications",
    "authors": [
     "",
     "Gabriel Niță"
    ],
    "language": null,
    "publisher": "ADJURIS – International Academic Publisher",
    "checkedAt": "2026-08-09T06:13:44.631Z",
    "responseBodySha256": "783cbe78c748997edcb73c1b4b64b07caa37f1df3074f2ad958b28a1221c7076",
    "providerReceipt": {
     "path": "outputs/historical-backfill-2026-08-08-crossref/raw-receipts/crossref-009-00001.json",
     "sha256": "04c93d9e1d368d4bdf7931b441e6ca8b0e2c4c673644d2fbe23d95672eea62e3",
     "byteLength": 2159683
    }
   },
   "independentRationale": "The exact proposition is present in the live Crossref abstract and the deposited reference list contains no Kaal-authored reference; the relationship is limited to the independently stated proposition.",
   "nonOverlap": {
    "candidateIdMatches": 0,
    "canonicalUrlMatches": 0,
    "propositionHashMatches": 0
   }
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed batch and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "1e13f5e7da6559d3d73c4c1b554c4fd414435188e0e94b98e01e4b724a22b13e"
}