{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-055",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-055",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming End To End Smart Legal Contracts 4Cf27D6C1C",
 "text": "End-to-End Smart Legal Contracts argues that smart contracts need a firm private-law foundation before regulation is considered. This independently corresponds to Kaal's sequencing claim that contract-law doctrine must be adjusted before smart contracts are fully accommodated. The abstract proposition does not identify which formation, interpretation, conditions, or remedies rules require adjustment.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "law-and-legal-systems",
  "smart-contracts",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.62.",
  "The primary mapping cleared the automated ambiguity test; substantive scope remains review-bound.",
  "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
  "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
  "The source states that smart contracts need a firm private-law foundation before regulation is considered. This corresponds to Kaal's sequencing claim that contract-law doctrine requires substantive adjustment before smart contracts can be accommodated, but the proposition does not enumerate formation, interpretation, conditions, or remedies."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "End-to-End Smart Legal Contracts",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192858467.003.0003"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:2939127-027",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2939127-027",
  "citation": "Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in the Blockchain Revolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2939127",
  "paper": "Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in the Blockchain Revolution",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2017",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=2939127",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "abcef529c7200261c59eec43018375b3b26e3186239fb9d002bacc298dba26ff"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2939127-027"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "End-to-End Smart Legal Contracts",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192858467.003.0003"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-08:continuous-crossref-0010-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-055",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-055.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-08-08:1d03f60ff63765323a83",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.62,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source states that smart contracts need a firm private-law foundation before regulation is considered. This corresponds to Kaal's sequencing claim that contract-law doctrine requires substantive adjustment before smart contracts can be accommodated, but the proposition does not enumerate formation, interpretation, conditions, or remedies.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.1093/oso/9780192858467.003.0003",
  "queryId": "concept:7130a5f5ec8c",
  "queryText": "smart contracts tokenomics",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192858467.003.0003",
  "doi": "10.1093/oso/9780192858467.003.0003",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.1093/oso/9780192858467.003.0003",
   "Crossref": "10.1093/oso/9780192858467.003.0003"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-09T07:09:52.333Z",
  "providerPage": 1,
  "rawObservationSha256": "1ae2037c7a24019488672306d6a8f22b330397398d2bb858b0866a14daf9dd07",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "afbc0acf8bd09a62a5756d11e2ece80b266d06ee86f94aa735e3281225c5a828",
  "inputLine": 4509,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00001",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.1093/oso/9780192858467.003.0003",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Geoffrey Vos"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2022-04-28",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.1093/oso/9780192858467.003.0003",
   "crossref:10.1093/oso/9780192858467.003.0003",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192858467.003.0003",
   "title:04ccb47afb3ea8831bf4c993",
   "proposition:8ddf32f90727ac94f9b54cb074b98d54de122eae34465e3713b2f0ef8afc1326"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "It suggests that a firm legal (particularly private law) foundation is needed for smart contracts before regulation is considered.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "77fa45485c90c24ad136d93ee3cefb671a5cdd21490e44c64da5a05f5bfec8ac",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 1,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2939127-027",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2939127-027",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.62,
    "method": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
    "whyRelevant": "The source states that smart contracts need a firm private-law foundation before regulation is considered. This corresponds to Kaal's sequencing claim that contract-law doctrine requires substantive adjustment before smart contracts can be accommodated, but the proposition does not enumerate formation, interpretation, conditions, or remedies.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "disposition": "retained",
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-continuous-crossref-substantive-review-v1",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-09T07:15:01.036Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex continuous substantive reviewer",
   "rationale": "The source states that smart contracts need a firm private-law foundation before regulation is considered. This corresponds to Kaal's sequencing claim that contract-law doctrine requires substantive adjustment before smart contracts can be accommodated, but the proposition does not enumerate formation, interpretation, conditions, or remedies.",
   "limitations": [
    "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
    "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
    "The source states that smart contracts need a firm private-law foundation before regulation is considered. This corresponds to Kaal's sequencing claim that contract-law doctrine requires substantive adjustment before smart contracts can be accommodated, but the proposition does not enumerate formation, interpretation, conditions, or remedies."
   ],
   "sourceIdentity": {
    "status": "verified",
    "source": "Crossref REST work record",
    "doi": "10.1093/oso/9780192858467.003.0003",
    "title": "End-to-End Smart Legal Contracts",
    "authors": [
     "Geoffrey Vos"
    ],
    "language": "en",
    "publisher": "Oxford University Press",
    "checkedAt": "2026-08-09T07:15:01.036Z",
    "responseBodySha256": "15aacca50dfb7faed7255abce444c186237fe5508691d765996d3690a4fd64d2",
    "providerReceipt": {
     "path": "outputs/historical-backfill-2026-08-08-crossref/raw-receipts/crossref-010-00001.json",
     "sha256": "1d236d82c4cfb2fedad371cc6445b9b515f8e8965cb8d53bfe58ef478d1de319",
     "byteLength": 2044106
    }
   },
   "independentRationale": "The exact proposition is present in the live Crossref abstract and the deposited reference list contains no Kaal-authored reference; the relationship is limited to the independently stated proposition.",
   "nonOverlap": {
    "candidateIdMatches": 0,
    "canonicalUrlMatches": 0,
    "propositionHashMatches": 0
   }
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed batch and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "42c8fda414efec3beec544ae9008b0f07cae3670c7cfbe3ed2b3f0916f9f27e3"
}