{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-056",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-056",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Do Smart Contracts Incur Higher Transaction Costs Than Traditional Contracts 4112Fa0866",
 "text": "Do Smart Contracts Incur Higher Transaction Costs than Traditional Contracts? argues that adapting institutional arrangements can cause smart contracts to incur higher transaction costs than traditional contracts. This directly challenges Kaal's proposition that smart contracting removes almost all transaction costs. The abstract frames the result as a possibility grounded in transaction-cost economics and does not provide an empirical cost estimate.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "contradiction",
 "keywords": [
  "smart-contracts",
  "economics",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level contradiction.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.62.",
  "The primary mapping cleared the automated ambiguity test; substantive scope remains review-bound.",
  "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
  "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
  "The source states that smart contracts may incur higher transaction costs than traditional contracts because institutional arrangements must adapt. This directly challenges Kaal's near-zero-transaction-cost proposition, while remaining a theoretical possibility claim rather than an empirical estimate."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Do Smart Contracts Incur Higher Transaction Costs than Traditional Contracts?",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4491727"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:3405401-006",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3405401-006",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Commerce – A Primer on Why Decentralized Reputation Verification Systems Are Needed (2019). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3405401",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Commerce – A Primer on Why Decentralized Reputation Verification Systems Are Needed",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2019",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=3405401",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "bc2d6f0ddc0852fb4085c4543c7c1dec19aaf8745eb67e3acc637e552bd7fb7d"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3405401-006"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Do Smart Contracts Incur Higher Transaction Costs than Traditional Contracts?",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4491727"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-08:continuous-crossref-0010-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-056",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-056.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-08-08:1770eb5c900034eb1dbe",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level contradiction",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.62,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source states that smart contracts may incur higher transaction costs than traditional contracts because institutional arrangements must adapt. This directly challenges Kaal's near-zero-transaction-cost proposition, while remaining a theoretical possibility claim rather than an empirical estimate.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.2139/ssrn.4491727",
  "queryId": "concept:7130a5f5ec8c",
  "queryText": "smart contracts tokenomics",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4491727",
  "doi": "10.2139/ssrn.4491727",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.2139/ssrn.4491727",
   "Crossref": "10.2139/ssrn.4491727"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-09T07:09:52.333Z",
  "providerPage": 1,
  "rawObservationSha256": "cb41c60cae606251cf3164242cd5f90667623d2250cef9b05a63abfe543fb9d9",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "afbc0acf8bd09a62a5756d11e2ece80b266d06ee86f94aa735e3281225c5a828",
  "inputLine": 4534,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00001",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.2139/ssrn.4491727",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Massimiliano Vatiero"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2023-01-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.2139/ssrn.4491727",
   "crossref:10.2139/ssrn.4491727",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4491727",
   "title:96b4372e0c2a5fafbc555aa8",
   "proposition:07b483c094bcb3f1e39b2addfccb49a573d233e4b4c81e8f33ab7a1ea8f8ed6f"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Given the need for an efficiency-enhancing adaptation of institutional arrangements – a chief problem of Oliver Williamson’s transaction cost economics – smart contracts may incur higher transaction costs than traditional contracts.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "e4c5eb1bc4d5142478c14e1f6d2b1311ce78aba0891a44bc75af251c7336c7e6",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 2,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3405401-006",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3405401-006",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.62,
    "method": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
    "whyRelevant": "The source states that smart contracts may incur higher transaction costs than traditional contracts because institutional arrangements must adapt. This directly challenges Kaal's near-zero-transaction-cost proposition, while remaining a theoretical possibility claim rather than an empirical estimate.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "disposition": "retained",
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-continuous-crossref-substantive-review-v1",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-09T07:15:01.036Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex continuous substantive reviewer",
   "rationale": "The source states that smart contracts may incur higher transaction costs than traditional contracts because institutional arrangements must adapt. This directly challenges Kaal's near-zero-transaction-cost proposition, while remaining a theoretical possibility claim rather than an empirical estimate.",
   "limitations": [
    "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
    "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
    "The source states that smart contracts may incur higher transaction costs than traditional contracts because institutional arrangements must adapt. This directly challenges Kaal's near-zero-transaction-cost proposition, while remaining a theoretical possibility claim rather than an empirical estimate."
   ],
   "sourceIdentity": {
    "status": "verified",
    "source": "Crossref REST work record",
    "doi": "10.2139/ssrn.4491727",
    "title": "Do Smart Contracts Incur Higher Transaction Costs than Traditional Contracts?",
    "authors": [
     "Massimiliano Vatiero"
    ],
    "language": null,
    "publisher": "Elsevier BV",
    "checkedAt": "2026-08-09T07:15:01.036Z",
    "responseBodySha256": "200280320cd0ebc8c511a9d48942e4f1e137a37524f7d480c52dc1d8cefa4086",
    "providerReceipt": {
     "path": "outputs/historical-backfill-2026-08-08-crossref/raw-receipts/crossref-010-00001.json",
     "sha256": "1d236d82c4cfb2fedad371cc6445b9b515f8e8965cb8d53bfe58ef478d1de319",
     "byteLength": 2044106
    }
   },
   "independentRationale": "The exact proposition is present in the live Crossref abstract and the deposited reference list contains no Kaal-authored reference; the relationship is limited to the independently stated proposition.",
   "nonOverlap": {
    "candidateIdMatches": 0,
    "canonicalUrlMatches": 0,
    "propositionHashMatches": 0
   }
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed batch and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "8aa15de087343bdd281f78c2e81f29b835ef7be2c7597375ef7c12f8ac9f52ac"
}