{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-062",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-062",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Beyond Traditional Contracts Smart Contracts And The Transformation Of Indian Co 9648849F03",
 "text": "Beyond Traditional Contracts reports that the legal status of smart contracts in Indian commercial law remains doctrinally fragmented. This independently supplies an India-specific instance of the regulatory uncertainty Kaal identifies around blockchain and smart contracts. The proposition does not establish the condition of financial-services law globally or prove that every jurisdiction must change its framework.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "law-and-legal-systems",
  "smart-contracts",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.62.",
  "The primary mapping cleared the automated ambiguity test; substantive scope remains review-bound.",
  "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
  "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
  "The source states that smart-contract status in Indian commercial law remains doctrinally fragmented. This is jurisdiction-specific evidence corresponding to Kaal's broader regulatory-uncertainty claim, but it does not establish conditions in financial services or that legal frameworks worldwide must change."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "BEYOND TRADITIONAL CONTRACTS: SMART CONTRACTS AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF INDIAN COMMERCIAL LAW",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.65393/ijlrv6i1011"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:3227933-024",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227933-024",
  "citation": "Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Why 'Blockchain' Will Disrupt Corporate Organizations (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227933",
  "paper": "Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Why 'Blockchain' Will Disrupt Corporate Organizations",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2018",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227933",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "a9e9660c4dc25a2202f1da4e762f5885256e05f68c53ca51942f5833a7a4c108"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227933-024"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "BEYOND TRADITIONAL CONTRACTS: SMART CONTRACTS AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF INDIAN COMMERCIAL LAW",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.65393/ijlrv6i1011"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-08:continuous-crossref-0010-remainder-0001-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-062",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-062.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-08-08:ea3dcbdc86ce8425f2ed",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.62,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source states that smart-contract status in Indian commercial law remains doctrinally fragmented. This is jurisdiction-specific evidence corresponding to Kaal's broader regulatory-uncertainty claim, but it does not establish conditions in financial services or that legal frameworks worldwide must change.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.65393/ijlrv6i1011",
  "queryId": "concept:7130a5f5ec8c",
  "queryText": "smart contracts tokenomics",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.65393/ijlrv6i1011",
  "doi": "10.65393/ijlrv6i1011",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.65393/ijlrv6i1011",
   "Crossref": "10.65393/ijlrv6i1011"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-09T07:09:52.333Z",
  "providerPage": 1,
  "rawObservationSha256": "c21377daf0aeb32bf4574feeca50bfd8479f350e3c1ee0bcbb1d860484258a10",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "afbc0acf8bd09a62a5756d11e2ece80b266d06ee86f94aa735e3281225c5a828",
  "inputLine": 4709,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00001",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.65393/ijlrv6i1011",
  "workAuthors": [
   "BAIBHABA CHINHARA"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2026-07-22",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.65393/ijlrv6i1011",
   "crossref:10.65393/ijlrv6i1011",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.65393/ijlrv6i1011",
   "title:153cf2496d97bd2f58c290bb",
   "proposition:3ba90363044024da10e4a4be09fb43f7c50826d3ff296532a477c0c5a66313e0"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "While gaining global traction across finance and supply chains, their legal status within Indian commercial law remains doctrinally fragmented.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "48d07ca2e43ec3d250985158c7327c6483c44109b312696967c690540183bf68",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 1,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3227933-024",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227933-024",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.62,
    "method": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
    "whyRelevant": "The source states that smart-contract status in Indian commercial law remains doctrinally fragmented. This is jurisdiction-specific evidence corresponding to Kaal's broader regulatory-uncertainty claim, but it does not establish conditions in financial services or that legal frameworks worldwide must change.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "disposition": "retained",
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-continuous-crossref-substantive-review-v1",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-09T08:17:43.051Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex continuous substantive reviewer",
   "rationale": "The source states that smart-contract status in Indian commercial law remains doctrinally fragmented. This is jurisdiction-specific evidence corresponding to Kaal's broader regulatory-uncertainty claim, but it does not establish conditions in financial services or that legal frameworks worldwide must change.",
   "limitations": [
    "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
    "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
    "The source states that smart-contract status in Indian commercial law remains doctrinally fragmented. This is jurisdiction-specific evidence corresponding to Kaal's broader regulatory-uncertainty claim, but it does not establish conditions in financial services or that legal frameworks worldwide must change."
   ],
   "sourceIdentity": {
    "status": "verified",
    "source": "Crossref REST work record",
    "doi": "10.65393/ijlrv6i1011",
    "title": "BEYOND TRADITIONAL CONTRACTS: SMART CONTRACTS AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF INDIAN COMMERCIAL LAW",
    "authors": [
     "BAIBHABA CHINHARA"
    ],
    "language": null,
    "publisher": "Institute of Legal Education",
    "checkedAt": "2026-08-09T08:17:43.051Z",
    "responseBodySha256": "fbfdb8d50313e9a48a62c4df0e7fb8222e431957f0a1a3d28dd48192257e2925",
    "providerReceipt": {
     "path": "outputs/historical-backfill-2026-08-08-crossref/raw-receipts/crossref-010-00001.json",
     "sha256": "1d236d82c4cfb2fedad371cc6445b9b515f8e8965cb8d53bfe58ef478d1de319",
     "byteLength": 2044106
    }
   },
   "independentRationale": "The exact proposition is present in the live Crossref abstract and the deposited reference list contains no Kaal-authored reference; the relationship is limited to the independently stated proposition.",
   "nonOverlap": {
    "candidateIdMatches": 0,
    "canonicalUrlMatches": 0,
    "propositionHashMatches": 0
   }
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed batch and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "00c2d464ebfd000ad9352cc9820507a91b53e927bc180790f958e0d6c66d5cf0"
}