{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-082",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-082",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Why Smart Contracts Reported As Vulnerable Were Not Exploited 0A4771Ff47",
 "text": "Why Smart Contracts Reported as Vulnerable were not Exploited states that only a few reported vulnerabilities are exploited. This independently qualifies Kaal's identification of smart-contract vulnerabilities as a material loss channel by separating vulnerability prevalence from realized exploitation. The abstract does not dispute the size of losses when exploitation occurs or provide a denominator.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "smart-contracts",
  "consensus-and-security",
  "empirical-evidence",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.62.",
  "The primary mapping cleared the automated ambiguity test; substantive scope remains review-bound.",
  "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
  "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
  "The source states that only a few reported smart-contract vulnerabilities are exploited. This qualifies Kaal's loss-channel claim by distinguishing reported vulnerabilities from realized exploitation, but it does not dispute the size of losses when exploitation occurs or provide a denominator in the abstract."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Why Smart Contracts Reported as Vulnerable were not Exploited?",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.21953189.v2"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:4734750-003",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4734750-003",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Code Review DAO (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4734750",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Code Review DAO",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2024",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=4734750",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "60eadf91c0913468505afc664c8d8d1e1673d6c5326d031ca7060addb8ab2eda"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4734750-003"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Why Smart Contracts Reported as Vulnerable were not Exploited?",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.21953189.v2"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-08:continuous-crossref-0010-remainder-0002-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-082",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-082.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-08-08:1ce616db20950569269c",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.62,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source states that only a few reported smart-contract vulnerabilities are exploited. This qualifies Kaal's loss-channel claim by distinguishing reported vulnerabilities from realized exploitation, but it does not dispute the size of losses when exploitation occurs or provide a denominator in the abstract.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.36227/techrxiv.21953189.v2",
  "queryId": "concept:7130a5f5ec8c",
  "queryText": "smart contracts tokenomics",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.21953189.v2",
  "doi": "10.36227/techrxiv.21953189.v2",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.36227/techrxiv.21953189.v2",
   "Crossref": "10.36227/techrxiv.21953189.v2"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-09T07:09:52.333Z",
  "providerPage": 1,
  "rawObservationSha256": "740a1f04b94a638b013f0da6520ff9ba4062733828b0529f257ade916014e9cf",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "afbc0acf8bd09a62a5756d11e2ece80b266d06ee86f94aa735e3281225c5a828",
  "inputLine": 4939,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00001",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.36227/techrxiv.21953189.v2",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Tianyuan Hu",
   "Jingyue Li",
   "Bixin Li",
   "André Storhaug"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2023-03-21",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.36227/techrxiv.21953189.v2",
   "crossref:10.36227/techrxiv.21953189.v2",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.21953189.v2",
   "title:d0ad5eb57dec806a88374cee",
   "proposition:47383c374373d3fd9fbe66ac2e2673b942a6a24e91bdc558e27696e17478e6cc"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Studies show that few of the reported vulnerabilities are exploited.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "1c8fbe8d4fe8c5612c6b786aa420a999ce9c8708c08412e21a4640bafe330ba5",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 1,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:4734750-003",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4734750-003",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.62,
    "method": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
    "whyRelevant": "The source states that only a few reported smart-contract vulnerabilities are exploited. This qualifies Kaal's loss-channel claim by distinguishing reported vulnerabilities from realized exploitation, but it does not dispute the size of losses when exploitation occurs or provide a denominator in the abstract.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "disposition": "retained",
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-continuous-crossref-substantive-review-v1",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-09T09:16:04.163Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex continuous substantive reviewer",
   "rationale": "The source states that only a few reported smart-contract vulnerabilities are exploited. This qualifies Kaal's loss-channel claim by distinguishing reported vulnerabilities from realized exploitation, but it does not dispute the size of losses when exploitation occurs or provide a denominator in the abstract.",
   "limitations": [
    "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
    "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
    "The source states that only a few reported smart-contract vulnerabilities are exploited. This qualifies Kaal's loss-channel claim by distinguishing reported vulnerabilities from realized exploitation, but it does not dispute the size of losses when exploitation occurs or provide a denominator in the abstract."
   ],
   "sourceIdentity": {
    "status": "verified",
    "source": "Crossref REST work record",
    "doi": "10.36227/techrxiv.21953189.v2",
    "title": "Why Smart Contracts Reported as Vulnerable were not Exploited?",
    "authors": [
     "Tianyuan Hu",
     "Jingyue Li",
     "Bixin Li",
     "André Storhaug"
    ],
    "language": null,
    "publisher": "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)",
    "checkedAt": "2026-08-09T09:16:04.163Z",
    "responseBodySha256": "b704f8fa8b84883edafe501dfe0a04bcf36c97fcd11db832d9b83bee8e3e445a",
    "providerReceipt": {
     "path": "outputs/historical-backfill-2026-08-08-crossref/raw-receipts/crossref-010-00001.json",
     "sha256": "1d236d82c4cfb2fedad371cc6445b9b515f8e8965cb8d53bfe58ef478d1de319",
     "byteLength": 2044106
    }
   },
   "independentRationale": "The exact proposition is present in the live Crossref abstract and the deposited reference list contains no Kaal-authored reference; the relationship is limited to the independently stated proposition.",
   "nonOverlap": {
    "candidateIdMatches": 0,
    "canonicalUrlMatches": 0,
    "propositionHashMatches": 0
   }
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed batch and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "70b02bce33248469b19bb63ec0be36bd8bc62565477d564ead0dea4c5cc40ef1"
}