Agreement: La revolución digital en el Código Civil peruano: integrando smart contracts para el derecho del futuro

Record: kaal:position:2026-08-08-085 · 2026-08-08

La revolución digital en el Código Civil peruano identifies normative challenges from integrating smart contracts into Peruvian civil law and calls for explicit legislative recognition. This independently corresponds to Kaal's claim that legal frameworks must adapt to growing smart-contract use. The abstract does not specify which reforms are sufficient and does not generalize beyond Peru.

Affirmed commentary position. This record extends a source-bound scholarly claim but is not a verbatim paper claim.

Holds when

The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
External evidence level: abstract indexed.
Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level agreement.
Primary mapping confidence: 0.62.
The primary mapping cleared the automated ambiguity test; substantive scope remains review-bound.
Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.
No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.
The source identifies normative challenges from integrating smart contracts into Peruvian civil law and calls for explicit legislative recognition. This jurisdiction-specific conclusion corresponds to Kaal's claim that legal frameworks must adapt to growing smart-contract use, without establishing which reforms are sufficient or generalizing beyond Peru.

Current debate

La revolución digital en el Código Civil peruano: integrando smart contracts para el derecho del futuro

Scholarly basis

kaal:claim:3227933-024
Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Why 'Blockchain' Will Disrupt Corporate Organizations (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227933
Source PDF sha256: a9e9660c4dc25a2202f1da4e762f5885256e05f68c53ca51942f5833a7a4c108

Evidence and mapping

Evidence: abstract indexed
Review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level agreement
Mapping confidence: 0.62
Mapping ambiguous: false

Topics

law-and-legal-systems smart-contracts historical-response scholarly-literature crossref

Provenance

Affirmed in kaal-review:2026-08-08:continuous-crossref-0010-remainder-0003-reviewed-v1 on 2026-08-08. Review record.

Verify

Canonical markdown sha256: 2f0590c2e628530dbabee3eff4027c084eb4d883087c41731bc6dff12f94256f
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-085.md | sha256sum