{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-095",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-095",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Legal Regulation Of The Issue Of Digital Financial Assets 90Bd89Bd0B",
 "text": "Legal Regulation of the Issue of Digital Financial Assets identifies the absence of a uniform approach to digital-law and digital-financial-asset concepts in Russian doctrine and enforcement practice. This independently supplies a jurisdiction-specific classification inconsistency corresponding to Kaal's classification-problem mechanism. It does not establish that the inconsistency caused regulatory failure or that uniformity is normatively preferable.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "law-and-legal-systems",
  "innovation",
  "systemic-risk",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.62.",
  "The primary mapping cleared the automated ambiguity test; substantive scope remains review-bound.",
  "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
  "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
  "The source identifies the absence of a uniform approach to digital-law and digital-financial-asset concepts in Russian doctrine and enforcement practice. This is a jurisdiction-specific classification inconsistency corresponding to Kaal's classification-problem mechanism, but it does not establish that the inconsistency caused regulatory failure or that uniformity is normatively preferable."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Legal Regulation of the Issue of Digital Financial Assets",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.61205/jrp.2023.094"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:2740477-008",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2740477-008",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Venture Capital as Dynamic Regulation of Disruptive Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2740477",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Venture Capital as Dynamic Regulation of Disruptive Innovation",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2016",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=2740477",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "c72871b76fa2ad5a8a69ee8d3defc8f64e624be9052ce763e79cf6c58883f726"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2740477-008"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Legal Regulation of the Issue of Digital Financial Assets",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.61205/jrp.2023.094"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-08:continuous-crossref-0011-oldest-0050-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-095",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-095.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-08-08:2a79991673206456fc96",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.62,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source identifies the absence of a uniform approach to digital-law and digital-financial-asset concepts in Russian doctrine and enforcement practice. This is a jurisdiction-specific classification inconsistency corresponding to Kaal's classification-problem mechanism, but it does not establish that the inconsistency caused regulatory failure or that uniformity is normatively preferable.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.61205/jrp.2023.094",
  "queryId": "concept:cdce38cb65b9",
  "queryText": "digital assets securities regulation",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.61205/jrp.2023.094",
  "doi": "10.61205/jrp.2023.094",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.61205/jrp.2023.094",
   "Crossref": "10.61205/jrp.2023.094"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-09T08:12:12.262Z",
  "providerPage": 1,
  "rawObservationSha256": "7f79f11bea8771192efc4b3823b004b6aa1167d5d83124fbeac49c39a72ed19f",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "5829c2764f83b19514a4b2695814ab254455f8d877e9703dbc39c64312d8e000",
  "inputLine": 5086,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00001",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.61205/jrp.2023.094",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Anna M. Lapteva"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2023-01-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.61205/jrp.2023.094",
   "crossref:10.61205/jrp.2023.094",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.61205/jrp.2023.094",
   "title:67a7a7b5e118152c827bad13",
   "proposition:2da98dcaac009184e8ab1140d45a6881374c3372f66b2cc1784af1586cb2759d"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "In the legal and economic doctrine, as well as in law enforcement practice, there is no uniform approach to the content of the concepts of “digital law”, “digital financial asset”, “utilitarian digital law”, which predetermined the topic of the study.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "3fffe2dd347839ea144322a32e6c3d299c4e71b54995d80609494737cb87d438",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 1,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2740477-008",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2740477-008",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.62,
    "method": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
    "whyRelevant": "The source identifies the absence of a uniform approach to digital-law and digital-financial-asset concepts in Russian doctrine and enforcement practice. This is a jurisdiction-specific classification inconsistency corresponding to Kaal's classification-problem mechanism, but it does not establish that the inconsistency caused regulatory failure or that uniformity is normatively preferable.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "disposition": "retained",
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-continuous-crossref-substantive-review-v1",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-09T11:19:10.476Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex continuous substantive reviewer",
   "rationale": "The source identifies the absence of a uniform approach to digital-law and digital-financial-asset concepts in Russian doctrine and enforcement practice. This is a jurisdiction-specific classification inconsistency corresponding to Kaal's classification-problem mechanism, but it does not establish that the inconsistency caused regulatory failure or that uniformity is normatively preferable.",
   "limitations": [
    "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
    "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
    "The source identifies the absence of a uniform approach to digital-law and digital-financial-asset concepts in Russian doctrine and enforcement practice. This is a jurisdiction-specific classification inconsistency corresponding to Kaal's classification-problem mechanism, but it does not establish that the inconsistency caused regulatory failure or that uniformity is normatively preferable."
   ],
   "sourceIdentity": {
    "status": "verified",
    "source": "Crossref REST work record",
    "doi": "10.61205/jrp.2023.094",
    "title": "Legal Regulation of the Issue of Digital Financial Assets",
    "authors": [
     "Anna M. Lapteva"
    ],
    "language": "en",
    "publisher": "Legal Publishing House "Norma"",
    "checkedAt": "2026-08-09T11:19:10.476Z",
    "responseBodySha256": "b61c5275f9fa437703d223dadb43810a87b70d0902284816e38f968d7b1c3ba1",
    "providerReceipt": {
     "path": "outputs/historical-backfill-2026-08-08-crossref/raw-receipts/crossref-011-00001.json",
     "sha256": "2998f6673b80a099a0a86027403f2a47b9817253198451e573a940b3f80cf5c2",
     "byteLength": 2030401
    }
   },
   "independentRationale": "The exact proposition is present in the live Crossref abstract and the deposited reference list contains no Kaal-authored reference; the relationship is limited to the independently stated proposition.",
   "nonOverlap": {
    "candidateIdMatches": 0,
    "canonicalUrlMatches": 0,
    "propositionHashMatches": 0
   }
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed batch and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "5a6556e02e0dcd27920daec378c9c899bce4d44125cc7fdbdbad39b9f3b3af75"
}