{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-104",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-104",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Commercial Law Corporate Law Securities Regulation And Antitrust 8679B7F440",
 "text": "Commercial Law: Corporate Law, Securities Regulation, and Antitrust reports that irrational behavior persists even in well-functioning competitive markets. This independently supports the bounded-rationality premise in Kaal's investor-protection claim. The abstract does not specifically address professional investors, complex instruments, or hard-to-value assets.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "agreement",
 "keywords": [
  "risk-and-incentives",
  "disclosure",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level agreement.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.62.",
  "The primary mapping cleared the automated ambiguity test; substantive scope remains review-bound.",
  "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
  "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
  "The source reports theoretical and empirical evidence that irrational behavior persists even in well-functioning competitive markets. This independently supports the bounded-rationality premise in Kaal's investor-protection claim, while not addressing professional investors, complex instruments, or hard-to-value assets specifically."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Commercial Law: Corporate Law, Securities Regulation, and Antitrust",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190901349.003.0011"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:1428387-037",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1428387-037",
  "citation": "Kaal, Hedge Fund Valuation Retailization, Regulation, and Investor Suitability (2009). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1428387",
  "paper": "Kaal, Hedge Fund Valuation Retailization, Regulation, and Investor Suitability",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2009",
  "ssrn": null,
  "source_pdf_sha256": "6aa3a280dc6750723be2389f3af2aabf3a16c4ce20e49fcdaddd7f2ea95a67aa"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1428387-037"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Commercial Law: Corporate Law, Securities Regulation, and Antitrust",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190901349.003.0011"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-08:continuous-crossref-0011-remainder-oldest-0050-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-104",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-104.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-08-08:8c93990af9b3a6d69a9b",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level agreement",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.62,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source reports theoretical and empirical evidence that irrational behavior persists even in well-functioning competitive markets. This independently supports the bounded-rationality premise in Kaal's investor-protection claim, while not addressing professional investors, complex instruments, or hard-to-value assets specifically.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.1093/oso/9780190901349.003.0011",
  "queryId": "concept:cdce38cb65b9",
  "queryText": "digital assets securities regulation",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190901349.003.0011",
  "doi": "10.1093/oso/9780190901349.003.0011",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.1093/oso/9780190901349.003.0011",
   "Crossref": "10.1093/oso/9780190901349.003.0011"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-09T08:12:12.262Z",
  "providerPage": 1,
  "rawObservationSha256": "7cbd4582c46e8f3f5d75686c6bace55ee7fc26a6bee02d6741eaf3a98f5c9715",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "5829c2764f83b19514a4b2695814ab254455f8d877e9703dbc39c64312d8e000",
  "inputLine": 5155,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00001",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.1093/oso/9780190901349.003.0011",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Eyal Zamir",
   "Doron Teichman"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2018-07-17",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.1093/oso/9780190901349.003.0011",
   "crossref:10.1093/oso/9780190901349.003.0011",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190901349.003.0011",
   "title:aea76c742433947d4d2b401e",
   "proposition:0e329bb1ef051bb48392b4b36243de5f4c47604ffc137dfd8b91d6f76f44d7da"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "As the theoretical analysis and empirical evidence demonstrate, irrational behavior is present even in such settings.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "078aa6fea05656071ce2022b9f5d1879e71946dfcf2bb7ccb29e254407de150d",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 2,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:1428387-037",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1428387-037",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.62,
    "method": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
    "whyRelevant": "The source reports theoretical and empirical evidence that irrational behavior persists even in well-functioning competitive markets. This independently supports the bounded-rationality premise in Kaal's investor-protection claim, while not addressing professional investors, complex instruments, or hard-to-value assets specifically.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "disposition": "retained",
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-continuous-crossref-substantive-review-v1",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-09T12:20:32.523Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex continuous substantive reviewer",
   "rationale": "The source reports theoretical and empirical evidence that irrational behavior persists even in well-functioning competitive markets. This independently supports the bounded-rationality premise in Kaal's investor-protection claim, while not addressing professional investors, complex instruments, or hard-to-value assets specifically.",
   "limitations": [
    "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
    "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
    "The source reports theoretical and empirical evidence that irrational behavior persists even in well-functioning competitive markets. This independently supports the bounded-rationality premise in Kaal's investor-protection claim, while not addressing professional investors, complex instruments, or hard-to-value assets specifically."
   ],
   "sourceIdentity": {
    "status": "verified",
    "source": "Crossref REST work record",
    "doi": "10.1093/oso/9780190901349.003.0011",
    "title": "Commercial Law: Corporate Law, Securities Regulation, and Antitrust",
    "authors": [
     "Eyal Zamir",
     "Doron Teichman"
    ],
    "language": "en",
    "publisher": "Oxford University Press",
    "checkedAt": "2026-08-09T12:20:32.523Z",
    "responseBodySha256": "d9318f04ccf297d7a4ac18e3ec5007389a96a8088cd915df634846728110cf61",
    "providerReceipt": {
     "path": "outputs/historical-backfill-2026-08-08-crossref/raw-receipts/crossref-011-00001.json",
     "sha256": "2998f6673b80a099a0a86027403f2a47b9817253198451e573a940b3f80cf5c2",
     "byteLength": 2030401
    }
   },
   "independentRationale": "The exact proposition is present in the live Crossref abstract and the deposited reference list contains no Kaal-authored reference; the relationship is limited to the independently stated proposition.",
   "nonOverlap": {
    "candidateIdMatches": 0,
    "canonicalUrlMatches": 0,
    "propositionHashMatches": 0
   }
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed batch and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "e35abd29e4bb17707a35f149004b57587acded75865ac5c31971e3f3701de4f0"
}