{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-108",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-108",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Avoiding The Anticommons Tragedy In Canadian Securities Regulation C2A2763Aa1",
 "text": "Avoiding the Anticommons Tragedy in Canadian Securities Regulation attributes higher regulatory costs to provincial regulators that fail to internalize the effects of their actions on the wider market. This supplies a concrete negative externality that qualifies Kaal's account of competition between legislators as a quality-sensitive feedback mechanism. The abstract does not show that all jurisdictional competition produces an anticommons.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "economics",
  "institutional-design",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.62.",
  "The primary mapping cleared the automated ambiguity test; substantive scope remains review-bound.",
  "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
  "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
  "The source attributes higher regulatory costs to multiple provincial regulators that fail to internalize the effects of their actions on the wider market. This supplies a concrete negative externality that qualifies Kaal's account of competition between legislators as a quality-sensitive feedback mechanism; it does not show that all jurisdictional competition produces an anticommons."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Avoiding the Anticommons Tragedy in Canadian Securities Regulation",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.327221"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:2267560-030",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2267560-030",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Evolution of Law Dynamic Regulation in a New Institutional Economics Framework (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2267560",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Evolution of Law Dynamic Regulation in a New Institutional Economics Framework",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2013",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=2267560",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "7ecc9dd1826121a95bf252476cdaa1c8737ad8079e12caf66c4342ffae7af8af"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2267560-030"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Avoiding the Anticommons Tragedy in Canadian Securities Regulation",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.327221"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-08:continuous-crossref-0011-remainder-0002-oldest-0050-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-108",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-108.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-08-08:bfd6afdf22c648fc5303",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.62,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source attributes higher regulatory costs to multiple provincial regulators that fail to internalize the effects of their actions on the wider market. This supplies a concrete negative externality that qualifies Kaal's account of competition between legislators as a quality-sensitive feedback mechanism; it does not show that all jurisdictional competition produces an anticommons.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.2139/ssrn.327221",
  "queryId": "concept:cdce38cb65b9",
  "queryText": "digital assets securities regulation",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.327221",
  "doi": "10.2139/ssrn.327221",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.2139/ssrn.327221",
   "Crossref": "10.2139/ssrn.327221"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-09T08:12:12.262Z",
  "providerPage": 1,
  "rawObservationSha256": "c8b59a3485014eaad83b14e4d07a9c87de2eae118d6948a2f74d2fc66f9e9d27",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "5829c2764f83b19514a4b2695814ab254455f8d877e9703dbc39c64312d8e000",
  "inputLine": 5197,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00001",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.2139/ssrn.327221",
  "workAuthors": [
   "David Abramovitch"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2002-01-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.2139/ssrn.327221",
   "crossref:10.2139/ssrn.327221",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.327221",
   "title:296ed07b05592b4645ec5369",
   "proposition:883a6a4c336064ddc8b23fa0145459983280def6a6bd34f687be0ac3afa6d3e5"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "This occurs due to increasing costs of regulation caused by regulators failing to internalize the effects that their actions have on the rest of the market.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "3c299c90743850f8050290385d7e89ae48f109871c64bf68b872cc30c69adffd",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 1,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2267560-030",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2267560-030",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.62,
    "method": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
    "whyRelevant": "The source attributes higher regulatory costs to multiple provincial regulators that fail to internalize the effects of their actions on the wider market. This supplies a concrete negative externality that qualifies Kaal's account of competition between legislators as a quality-sensitive feedback mechanism; it does not show that all jurisdictional competition produces an anticommons.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "disposition": "retained",
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-continuous-crossref-substantive-review-v1",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-09T13:19:28.946Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex continuous substantive reviewer",
   "rationale": "The source attributes higher regulatory costs to multiple provincial regulators that fail to internalize the effects of their actions on the wider market. This supplies a concrete negative externality that qualifies Kaal's account of competition between legislators as a quality-sensitive feedback mechanism; it does not show that all jurisdictional competition produces an anticommons.",
   "limitations": [
    "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
    "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
    "The source attributes higher regulatory costs to multiple provincial regulators that fail to internalize the effects of their actions on the wider market. This supplies a concrete negative externality that qualifies Kaal's account of competition between legislators as a quality-sensitive feedback mechanism; it does not show that all jurisdictional competition produces an anticommons."
   ],
   "sourceIdentity": {
    "status": "verified",
    "source": "Crossref REST work record",
    "doi": "10.2139/ssrn.327221",
    "title": "Avoiding the Anticommons Tragedy in Canadian Securities Regulation",
    "authors": [
     "David Abramovitch"
    ],
    "language": "unavailable",
    "publisher": "Elsevier BV",
    "checkedAt": "2026-08-09T13:19:28.946Z",
    "responseBodySha256": "22ca47e2dfda154314479af9d05bef5bf666363056c9e814ab3a00575a7c8e6a",
    "providerReceipt": {
     "path": "outputs/historical-backfill-2026-08-08-crossref/raw-receipts/crossref-011-00001.json",
     "sha256": "2998f6673b80a099a0a86027403f2a47b9817253198451e573a940b3f80cf5c2",
     "byteLength": 2030401
    }
   },
   "independentRationale": "The exact proposition is present in the live Crossref abstract and the deposited reference list contains no Kaal-authored reference; the relationship is limited to the independently stated proposition.",
   "nonOverlap": {
    "candidateIdMatches": 0,
    "canonicalUrlMatches": 0,
    "propositionHashMatches": 0
   }
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed batch and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "f47b4cd0748531a4647fc73f3248142e727e7c4c79198c8bb0ff4b7508d5415e"
}