{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-110",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-110",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming The Case For Self Regulation For The Digital Assets Industry 20141941F7",
 "text": "The case for self-regulation for the digital assets industry reports that self-regulation and SROs have been incorporated into legal frameworks to support effective and efficient capital-market development. This is institutionally consistent with Kaal's mixed mandatory-rule, market-solution, and private-ordering design. The abstract proposition does not measure adaptive capacity, collective-action effects, or regulatory-cycle dampening.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "risk-and-incentives",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.62.",
  "The primary mapping cleared the automated ambiguity test; substantive scope remains review-bound.",
  "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
  "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
  "The source reports that self-regulation and SROs have been incorporated into legal frameworks to support effective and efficient capital-market development. This supplies institutional evidence consistent with Kaal's mixed mandatory-rule, market-solution, and private-ordering design, but the proposition does not measure adaptive capacity, collective-action effects, or regulatory-cycle dampening."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "The case for self-regulation for the digital assets industry",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.69554/pgjq5722"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:2273857-066",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2273857-066",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation of the Financial Services Industry (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2273857",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation of the Financial Services Industry",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2013",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=2273857",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "e7cb3dea40593135acc99a9b00690138fe01020514ebf388f5140e1b0e59e82a"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2273857-066"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "The case for self-regulation for the digital assets industry",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.69554/pgjq5722"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-08:continuous-crossref-0011-remainder-0002-oldest-0050-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-110",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-110.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-08-08:9e88dfab98c30313a130",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.62,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source reports that self-regulation and SROs have been incorporated into legal frameworks to support effective and efficient capital-market development. This supplies institutional evidence consistent with Kaal's mixed mandatory-rule, market-solution, and private-ordering design, but the proposition does not measure adaptive capacity, collective-action effects, or regulatory-cycle dampening.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.69554/pgjq5722",
  "queryId": "concept:cdce38cb65b9",
  "queryText": "digital assets securities regulation",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.69554/pgjq5722",
  "doi": "10.69554/pgjq5722",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.69554/pgjq5722",
   "Crossref": "10.69554/pgjq5722"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-09T08:12:12.262Z",
  "providerPage": 1,
  "rawObservationSha256": "051598b5cfae7b11d44b31d9051d950b779cc980022950572e3c28b0b5ae9a72",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "5829c2764f83b19514a4b2695814ab254455f8d877e9703dbc39c64312d8e000",
  "inputLine": 5223,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00001",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.69554/pgjq5722",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Alma Angotti",
   "Tracy Angulo",
   "Gene Bolton",
   "Gabriella Kusz"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2023-10-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.69554/pgjq5722",
   "crossref:10.69554/pgjq5722",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.69554/pgjq5722",
   "title:9d59a3b7a86e16a5b681ea0f",
   "proposition:2594c1f6379a5c743205835484f1b2a59d60a06f2ac74fd86e5fc2071df93707"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "The concept of self-regulation and the use of self-regulatory organisations (SROs) as a feature of legal and regulatory frameworks has been adopted to support effective and efficient capital market development in a number of countries around the world.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "4a6cff02845e8653b3a5d05c7afb7bbbcf301fa884ec1112dd01aa68a4b7dc5b",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 0,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2273857-066",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2273857-066",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.62,
    "method": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
    "whyRelevant": "The source reports that self-regulation and SROs have been incorporated into legal frameworks to support effective and efficient capital-market development. This supplies institutional evidence consistent with Kaal's mixed mandatory-rule, market-solution, and private-ordering design, but the proposition does not measure adaptive capacity, collective-action effects, or regulatory-cycle dampening.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "disposition": "retained",
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-continuous-crossref-substantive-review-v1",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-09T13:19:28.946Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex continuous substantive reviewer",
   "rationale": "The source reports that self-regulation and SROs have been incorporated into legal frameworks to support effective and efficient capital-market development. This supplies institutional evidence consistent with Kaal's mixed mandatory-rule, market-solution, and private-ordering design, but the proposition does not measure adaptive capacity, collective-action effects, or regulatory-cycle dampening.",
   "limitations": [
    "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
    "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
    "The source reports that self-regulation and SROs have been incorporated into legal frameworks to support effective and efficient capital-market development. This supplies institutional evidence consistent with Kaal's mixed mandatory-rule, market-solution, and private-ordering design, but the proposition does not measure adaptive capacity, collective-action effects, or regulatory-cycle dampening."
   ],
   "sourceIdentity": {
    "status": "verified",
    "source": "Crossref REST work record",
    "doi": "10.69554/pgjq5722",
    "title": "The case for self-regulation for the digital assets industry",
    "authors": [
     "Alma Angotti",
     "Tracy Angulo",
     "Gene Bolton",
     "Gabriella Kusz"
    ],
    "language": "en",
    "publisher": "Henry Stewart Publications",
    "checkedAt": "2026-08-09T13:19:28.946Z",
    "responseBodySha256": "06faad5bb037e7c99ee4f4cc36f4bd5e03b2988981ce25d4b80464f597dec43a",
    "providerReceipt": {
     "path": "outputs/historical-backfill-2026-08-08-crossref/raw-receipts/crossref-011-00001.json",
     "sha256": "2998f6673b80a099a0a86027403f2a47b9817253198451e573a940b3f80cf5c2",
     "byteLength": 2030401
    }
   },
   "independentRationale": "The exact proposition is present in the live Crossref abstract and the deposited reference list contains no Kaal-authored reference; the relationship is limited to the independently stated proposition.",
   "nonOverlap": {
    "candidateIdMatches": 0,
    "canonicalUrlMatches": 0,
    "propositionHashMatches": 0
   }
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed batch and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "941a4ca791473e4eb6e8ca53f31bd10778325fea15a043a352627367b12b9f94"
}