{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-128",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-128",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming The Qualification Of Crypto Assets As Securities Under Turkish Law A Comparative Bdafe9Ff1F",
 "text": "The Qualification of Crypto-Assets as Securities Under Turkish Law states that Turkish law has no published guidance on when crypto-assets qualify as securities. This supplies a comparative guidance gap relevant to Kaal's rights-based classification account under German law. The source does not establish that German criteria control in Turkey or state the classification rule Turkish authorities should adopt.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "systemic-risk",
  "tokenomics",
  "securities-law",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level extension.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.62.",
  "The primary mapping cleared the automated ambiguity test; substantive scope remains review-bound.",
  "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
  "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
  "The source states that Turkish law has no published guidance on when crypto-assets qualify as securities. This supplies a comparative guidance gap relevant to Kaal's rights-based classification account under German law, while it does not establish that German criteria control in Turkey or state the classification rule Turkish authorities should adopt."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "THE QUALIFICATION OF CRYPTO-ASSETS AS SECURITIES UNDER TURKISH LAW: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.69800/blr.1838778"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:3117224-028",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3117224-028",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Initial Coin Offerings The Top 25 Jurisdictions and Their Comparative Regulatory Responses (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3117224",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Initial Coin Offerings The Top 25 Jurisdictions and Their Comparative Regulatory Responses",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2018",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=3117224",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "83e9ccb9219a217d9fcfc5c098b897229ee7cf85623bee3ae22d2e986548466b"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3117224-028"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "THE QUALIFICATION OF CRYPTO-ASSETS AS SECURITIES UNDER TURKISH LAW: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.69800/blr.1838778"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-08:continuous-crossref-0011-remainder-0004-oldest-0050-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-128",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-128.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-08-08:972c76f04beccf9a810d",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level extension",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.62,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source states that Turkish law has no published guidance on when crypto-assets qualify as securities. This supplies a comparative guidance gap relevant to Kaal's rights-based classification account under German law, while it does not establish that German criteria control in Turkey or state the classification rule Turkish authorities should adopt.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.69800/blr.1838778",
  "queryId": "concept:cdce38cb65b9",
  "queryText": "digital assets securities regulation",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.69800/blr.1838778",
  "doi": "10.69800/blr.1838778",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.69800/blr.1838778",
   "Crossref": "10.69800/blr.1838778"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-09T08:12:12.262Z",
  "providerPage": 1,
  "rawObservationSha256": "291d725174aa83006fc1dbf05a8a1d86c22a86424982ded7de5aeaa099837b6f",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "5829c2764f83b19514a4b2695814ab254455f8d877e9703dbc39c64312d8e000",
  "inputLine": 5371,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00001",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.69800/blr.1838778",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Hacer Ülkü Doğan Kaya"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2025-12-31",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.69800/blr.1838778",
   "crossref:10.69800/blr.1838778",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.69800/blr.1838778",
   "title:bc65d79245fbec2995884fa2",
   "proposition:24faf3fb3eda2f599f1a11ff10a090ddb0dbceaf2e701727f4cd2670fd96e105"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Unlike the situation in some other jurisdictions, there is no published guidance regarding when crypto-assets can be considered as securities under Turkish law.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "5cc2a5303f9df4c91a0c59ba0743a3e6d7123e8bacb4658120e31b879b91a8dc",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 0,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3117224-028",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3117224-028",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.62,
    "method": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
    "whyRelevant": "The source states that Turkish law has no published guidance on when crypto-assets qualify as securities. This supplies a comparative guidance gap relevant to Kaal's rights-based classification account under German law, while it does not establish that German criteria control in Turkey or state the classification rule Turkish authorities should adopt.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "disposition": "retained",
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-continuous-crossref-substantive-review-v1",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-09T15:21:15.995Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex continuous substantive reviewer",
   "rationale": "The source states that Turkish law has no published guidance on when crypto-assets qualify as securities. This supplies a comparative guidance gap relevant to Kaal's rights-based classification account under German law, while it does not establish that German criteria control in Turkey or state the classification rule Turkish authorities should adopt.",
   "limitations": [
    "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
    "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
    "The source states that Turkish law has no published guidance on when crypto-assets qualify as securities. This supplies a comparative guidance gap relevant to Kaal's rights-based classification account under German law, while it does not establish that German criteria control in Turkey or state the classification rule Turkish authorities should adopt."
   ],
   "sourceIdentity": {
    "status": "verified",
    "source": "Crossref REST work record",
    "doi": "10.69800/blr.1838778",
    "title": "THE QUALIFICATION OF CRYPTO-ASSETS AS SECURITIES UNDER TURKISH LAW: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS",
    "authors": [
     "Hacer Ülkü Doğan Kaya"
    ],
    "language": "unavailable",
    "publisher": "Boğaziçi University Faculty of Law",
    "checkedAt": "2026-08-09T15:21:15.995Z",
    "responseBodySha256": "f80c7784ee88b7dc16184230f2ecefedb6ed8daa861ba71fe8e76828adf6cd27",
    "providerReceipt": {
     "path": "outputs/historical-backfill-2026-08-08-crossref/raw-receipts/crossref-011-00001.json",
     "sha256": "2998f6673b80a099a0a86027403f2a47b9817253198451e573a940b3f80cf5c2",
     "byteLength": 2030401
    }
   },
   "independentRationale": "The exact proposition is present in the live Crossref abstract and the deposited reference list contains no Kaal-authored reference; the relationship is limited to the independently stated proposition.",
   "nonOverlap": {
    "candidateIdMatches": 0,
    "canonicalUrlMatches": 0,
    "propositionHashMatches": 0
   }
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed batch and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "c16ab51ede5499a7ad2732aafe7cb76d54110bf3f45424f640f6a039c59798cd"
}