{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-139",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-139",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Blinded By The Light Information Overload And Its Consequences For Securities Re 98A1Dd9834",
 "text": "Blinded by the Light identifies the assumption that more information is better as a major motivation for securities regulation. This states the regulatory premise that Kaal qualifies by showing why more disclosure may not improve governance when information is difficult to assess. The abstract proposition does not itself establish information overload or governance failure.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "disclosure",
  "governance-design",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.62.",
  "The primary mapping cleared the automated ambiguity test; substantive scope remains review-bound.",
  "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
  "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
  "The source identifies the assumption that more information is better as a major motivation for securities regulation. This states the regulatory premise that Kaal's claim directly qualifies by explaining why more disclosure may not improve governance when information is difficult to assess, while the source proposition does not itself establish information overload or governance failure."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Blinded by the Light: Information Overload and its Consequences for Securities Regulation",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.413180"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:1428387-032",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1428387-032",
  "citation": "Kaal, Hedge Fund Valuation Retailization, Regulation, and Investor Suitability (2009). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1428387",
  "paper": "Kaal, Hedge Fund Valuation Retailization, Regulation, and Investor Suitability",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2009",
  "ssrn": null,
  "source_pdf_sha256": "6aa3a280dc6750723be2389f3af2aabf3a16c4ce20e49fcdaddd7f2ea95a67aa"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1428387-032"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Blinded by the Light: Information Overload and its Consequences for Securities Regulation",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.413180"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-08:continuous-crossref-0011-remainder-0005-all-0022-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-139",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-139.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-08-08:f12364acfd6ed9590609",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.62,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source identifies the assumption that more information is better as a major motivation for securities regulation. This states the regulatory premise that Kaal's claim directly qualifies by explaining why more disclosure may not improve governance when information is difficult to assess, while the source proposition does not itself establish information overload or governance failure.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.2139/ssrn.413180",
  "queryId": "concept:cdce38cb65b9",
  "queryText": "digital assets securities regulation",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.413180",
  "doi": "10.2139/ssrn.413180",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.2139/ssrn.413180",
   "Crossref": "10.2139/ssrn.413180"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-09T08:12:12.262Z",
  "providerPage": 1,
  "rawObservationSha256": "64ad00a60636853bb292aa37c1bb3c8d309603188a3e02ff415e800a9ee7eecb",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "5829c2764f83b19514a4b2695814ab254455f8d877e9703dbc39c64312d8e000",
  "inputLine": 5499,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00001",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.2139/ssrn.413180",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Troy A. Paredes"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2020-01-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.2139/ssrn.413180",
   "crossref:10.2139/ssrn.413180",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.413180",
   "title:6b2d11f30819d0bdb0c6a14b",
   "proposition:c4df1378d49b2166c54aca2ce2632da0c78df3b0cdbb6dac7884987a8991cf4f"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Securities regulation is motivated, in large part, by the assumption that more information is better than less.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "024b11a71422710960ee3742183c71ca671c925c2bbbcd6db45ab12151f7ceeb",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 1,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:1428387-032",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1428387-032",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.62,
    "method": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
    "whyRelevant": "The source identifies the assumption that more information is better as a major motivation for securities regulation. This states the regulatory premise that Kaal's claim directly qualifies by explaining why more disclosure may not improve governance when information is difficult to assess, while the source proposition does not itself establish information overload or governance failure.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "disposition": "retained",
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-continuous-crossref-substantive-review-v1",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-09T16:18:06.356Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex continuous substantive reviewer",
   "rationale": "The source identifies the assumption that more information is better as a major motivation for securities regulation. This states the regulatory premise that Kaal's claim directly qualifies by explaining why more disclosure may not improve governance when information is difficult to assess, while the source proposition does not itself establish information overload or governance failure.",
   "limitations": [
    "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
    "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
    "The source identifies the assumption that more information is better as a major motivation for securities regulation. This states the regulatory premise that Kaal's claim directly qualifies by explaining why more disclosure may not improve governance when information is difficult to assess, while the source proposition does not itself establish information overload or governance failure."
   ],
   "sourceIdentity": {
    "status": "verified",
    "source": "Crossref REST work record",
    "doi": "10.2139/ssrn.413180",
    "title": "Blinded by the Light: Information Overload and its Consequences for Securities Regulation",
    "authors": [
     "Troy A. Paredes"
    ],
    "language": "unavailable",
    "publisher": "Elsevier BV",
    "checkedAt": "2026-08-09T16:18:06.356Z",
    "responseBodySha256": "877e704eca068a40f488f51ecd4a7d38303f626987ec3d137dc1f2d4014bd387",
    "providerReceipt": {
     "path": "outputs/historical-backfill-2026-08-08-crossref/raw-receipts/crossref-011-00001.json",
     "sha256": "2998f6673b80a099a0a86027403f2a47b9817253198451e573a940b3f80cf5c2",
     "byteLength": 2030401
    }
   },
   "independentRationale": "The exact proposition is present in the live Crossref abstract and the deposited reference list contains no Kaal-authored reference; the relationship is limited to the independently stated proposition.",
   "nonOverlap": {
    "candidateIdMatches": 0,
    "canonicalUrlMatches": 0,
    "propositionHashMatches": 0
   }
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed batch and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "6b49afe1ab36f4cbaedec37833e500e9c5df451456aa85e0bc67bd4e20815a8a"
}