{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-150",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-150",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Relational Integrity In Multi Agent Ai Systems A Polarity Model Framework For Hu 41D6938Fe0",
 "text": "Relational Integrity in Multi-Agent AI Systems argues that AI safety approaches which specify outcomes in advance become brittle when reality moves beyond the specification and can become sterile through over-constraint. This extends Kaal's brittleness mechanism for explicitly programmed legal expert systems to a broader AI-safety architecture setting. The abstract supplies an architectural claim, not a measured failure rate or evidence that every specified safety constraint is harmful.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "law-and-legal-systems",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level extension.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.62.",
  "The primary mapping cleared the automated ambiguity test; substantive scope remains review-bound.",
  "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
  "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
  "The source argues that AI safety approaches which specify outcomes in advance become brittle when reality moves beyond the specification and can become sterile through over-constraint. This extends Kaal's documented brittleness mechanism for explicitly programmed legal expert systems to a broader AI-safety architecture setting; it is an abstract-level architectural claim, not a measured failure rate or evidence that every specified safety constraint is harmful."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Relational Integrity in Multi-Agent AI Systems: A Polarity Model Framework for Human-AI Safety",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6716459"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:5541658-002",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-002",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2025",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "e543a2d698fcd522d4d02e034cc9ee1344d0015d2c824b40b9e05ab7c0728c60"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-002"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Relational Integrity in Multi-Agent AI Systems: A Polarity Model Framework for Human-AI Safety",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6716459"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-08:continuous-crossref-0015-oldest-0050-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-150",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-150.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-08-08:9ebc4e8c5bd01169f309",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level extension",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.62,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source argues that AI safety approaches which specify outcomes in advance become brittle when reality moves beyond the specification and can become sterile through over-constraint. This extends Kaal's documented brittleness mechanism for explicitly programmed legal expert systems to a broader AI-safety architecture setting; it is an abstract-level architectural claim, not a measured failure rate or evidence that every specified safety constraint is harmful.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.2139/ssrn.6716459",
  "queryId": "concept:8542e1d4a2a4",
  "queryText": "AI agent reputation",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6716459",
  "doi": "10.2139/ssrn.6716459",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.2139/ssrn.6716459",
   "Crossref": "10.2139/ssrn.6716459"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-09T12:14:24.778Z",
  "providerPage": 1,
  "rawObservationSha256": "afe6fe099f7825e690a77ee07a5258edd5fa698ec279fb89dc4081f6a48269fd",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "2bab6ae028a03ca5d076ff5417f551f5a465ee2a375e93a2a8bec6487701f61b",
  "inputLine": 7102,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00001",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.2139/ssrn.6716459",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Priit Vimberg"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2026-01-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.2139/ssrn.6716459",
   "crossref:10.2139/ssrn.6716459",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6716459",
   "title:aae09a2e39b31e1f56d28458",
   "proposition:851bc93c3b95c070a3a6ad3e1591cc78faabd178a7575eacb9d19647b9f18902"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Current AI safety approaches specify outcomes in advance, producing brittle systems that fail when reality moves beyond the specification and that risk sterility through over-constraint.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "24fdb9da4245c37c376220a3d1161b33246662a88d7bdc9361f2c312b0b0c27c",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 1,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5541658-002",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-002",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.62,
    "method": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
    "whyRelevant": "The source argues that AI safety approaches which specify outcomes in advance become brittle when reality moves beyond the specification and can become sterile through over-constraint. This extends Kaal's documented brittleness mechanism for explicitly programmed legal expert systems to a broader AI-safety architecture setting; it is an abstract-level architectural claim, not a measured failure rate or evidence that every specified safety constraint is harmful.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "disposition": "retained",
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-continuous-crossref-substantive-review-v1",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-09T19:22:02.472Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex continuous substantive reviewer",
   "rationale": "The source argues that AI safety approaches which specify outcomes in advance become brittle when reality moves beyond the specification and can become sterile through over-constraint. This extends Kaal's documented brittleness mechanism for explicitly programmed legal expert systems to a broader AI-safety architecture setting; it is an abstract-level architectural claim, not a measured failure rate or evidence that every specified safety constraint is harmful.",
   "limitations": [
    "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
    "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
    "The source argues that AI safety approaches which specify outcomes in advance become brittle when reality moves beyond the specification and can become sterile through over-constraint. This extends Kaal's documented brittleness mechanism for explicitly programmed legal expert systems to a broader AI-safety architecture setting; it is an abstract-level architectural claim, not a measured failure rate or evidence that every specified safety constraint is harmful."
   ],
   "sourceIdentity": {
    "status": "verified",
    "source": "Crossref REST work record",
    "doi": "10.2139/ssrn.6716459",
    "title": "Relational Integrity in Multi-Agent AI Systems: A Polarity Model Framework for Human-AI Safety",
    "authors": [
     "Priit Vimberg"
    ],
    "language": "unavailable",
    "publisher": "Elsevier BV",
    "checkedAt": "2026-08-09T19:22:02.472Z",
    "responseBodySha256": "b66f7eb475580eaa2c1e99f7992494827553f1cb843774e8afc6e59cf46e0ba8",
    "providerReceipt": {
     "path": "outputs/historical-backfill-2026-08-08-crossref/raw-receipts/crossref-015-00001.json",
     "sha256": "77d874f2fd7fd9cb6ec31b6bf0fdd667ff7b7cbff6877eba58760481ebef6fac",
     "byteLength": 1525669
    }
   },
   "independentRationale": "The exact proposition is present in the live Crossref abstract and the deposited reference list contains no Kaal-authored reference; the relationship is limited to the independently stated proposition.",
   "nonOverlap": {
    "candidateIdMatches": 0,
    "canonicalUrlMatches": 0,
    "propositionHashMatches": 0
   }
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed batch and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "05ec2fcf379c7b05eaa0373611566e897802e75dc0a813aebcf08c642fab627e"
}