{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-174",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-174",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Licet Multi Modal Physiological Human Intent Verification For Autonomous Ai Agen Ceb4B8Be0F",
 "text": "LICET specifies per-event session keys, biometric temporal signatures, zero-knowledge proofs, and a hash-chained tamper-evident ledger as a concrete intent-attestation architecture. This extends Kaal's actual-versus-stated-intent distinction and real-time attestation claim with a physiological authorization mechanism. The abstract reports a design and deployment, not adversarial validation of coercion resistance.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "institutional-design",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level extension.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.62.",
  "The primary mapping cleared the automated ambiguity test; substantive scope remains review-bound.",
  "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
  "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
  "The source specifies per-event session keys, biometric temporal signatures, zero-knowledge proofs, and a hash-chained tamper-evident ledger as a concrete intent-attestation architecture. This extends Kaal's actual-versus-stated-intent distinction and real-time attestation claim with a physiological authorization mechanism; the abstract reports a design and deployment, not adversarial validation of coercion resistance."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "LICET: Multi-Modal Physiological Human-Intent Verification for Autonomous AI Agent Authorization",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.7018458"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:5886342-026",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5886342-026",
  "citation": "Furrer Andreas, Wulf A. Kaal, Stephan D. Meyer, Universal Digital Law Codex (UDLC) (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5886342",
  "paper": "Furrer Andreas, Wulf A. Kaal, Stephan D. Meyer, Universal Digital Law Codex (UDLC)",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2025",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=5886342",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "dc456a1ce2ea4a356dbcb35dc900ec36be94b8c9b6da4a2c8c268d6301f66359"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5886342-026"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "LICET: Multi-Modal Physiological Human-Intent Verification for Autonomous AI Agent Authorization",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.7018458"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-08:continuous-crossref-0015-remainder-0003-oldest-0050-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-174",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-174.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-08-08:1ee7befacfc99d749c6c",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level extension",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.62,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source specifies per-event session keys, biometric temporal signatures, zero-knowledge proofs, and a hash-chained tamper-evident ledger as a concrete intent-attestation architecture. This extends Kaal's actual-versus-stated-intent distinction and real-time attestation claim with a physiological authorization mechanism; the abstract reports a design and deployment, not adversarial validation of coercion resistance.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.2139/ssrn.7018458",
  "queryId": "concept:8542e1d4a2a4",
  "queryText": "AI agent reputation",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.7018458",
  "doi": "10.2139/ssrn.7018458",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.2139/ssrn.7018458",
   "Crossref": "10.2139/ssrn.7018458"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-09T12:14:25.365Z",
  "providerPage": 2,
  "rawObservationSha256": "1fb8e32b4172b588f1139c6de39ef7078d7a7e5b5c3cc01d0ce563400067a955",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "2bab6ae028a03ca5d076ff5417f551f5a465ee2a375e93a2a8bec6487701f61b",
  "inputLine": 7432,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00001",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.2139/ssrn.7018458",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Christian Rodrigues Pereira"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2026-01-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.2139/ssrn.7018458",
   "crossref:10.2139/ssrn.7018458",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.7018458",
   "title:1fd633671b278a4c6026393f",
   "proposition:a8fcf2df61250d78e9f12a1b6951b6669ec433202a2643761b09d3f9051e7e32"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "LICET defines a Biometric Trust Level hierarchy (L0-L3) aligned with the IETF RATS architecture (RFC 9334), per-event HKDF session-key derivation, HMAC biometric temporal signatures, Schnorr zero-knowledge proofs over BN128, and a SHA-256 hash-chained tamper-evident ledger.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "a44d1a9be8e375043e67111a7f07ecb146fe3a18938a1efe0bb789d32d38f972",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 2,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5886342-026",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5886342-026",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.62,
    "method": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
    "whyRelevant": "The source specifies per-event session keys, biometric temporal signatures, zero-knowledge proofs, and a hash-chained tamper-evident ledger as a concrete intent-attestation architecture. This extends Kaal's actual-versus-stated-intent distinction and real-time attestation claim with a physiological authorization mechanism; the abstract reports a design and deployment, not adversarial validation of coercion resistance.",
    "ambiguous": false
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:6421319-019",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/6421319-019",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.62,
    "method": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
    "whyRelevant": "The source specifies per-event session keys, biometric temporal signatures, zero-knowledge proofs, and a hash-chained tamper-evident ledger as a concrete intent-attestation architecture. This extends Kaal's actual-versus-stated-intent distinction and real-time attestation claim with a physiological authorization mechanism; the abstract reports a design and deployment, not adversarial validation of coercion resistance.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "disposition": "retained",
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-continuous-crossref-substantive-review-v1",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-09T22:23:41.223Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex continuous substantive reviewer",
   "rationale": "The source specifies per-event session keys, biometric temporal signatures, zero-knowledge proofs, and a hash-chained tamper-evident ledger as a concrete intent-attestation architecture. This extends Kaal's actual-versus-stated-intent distinction and real-time attestation claim with a physiological authorization mechanism; the abstract reports a design and deployment, not adversarial validation of coercion resistance.",
   "limitations": [
    "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
    "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
    "The source specifies per-event session keys, biometric temporal signatures, zero-knowledge proofs, and a hash-chained tamper-evident ledger as a concrete intent-attestation architecture. This extends Kaal's actual-versus-stated-intent distinction and real-time attestation claim with a physiological authorization mechanism; the abstract reports a design and deployment, not adversarial validation of coercion resistance."
   ],
   "sourceIdentity": {
    "status": "verified",
    "source": "Crossref REST work record",
    "doi": "10.2139/ssrn.7018458",
    "title": "LICET: Multi-Modal Physiological Human-Intent Verification for Autonomous AI Agent Authorization",
    "authors": [
     "Christian Rodrigues Pereira"
    ],
    "language": "unavailable",
    "publisher": "Elsevier BV",
    "checkedAt": "2026-08-09T22:23:41.223Z",
    "responseBodySha256": "372e9de30ab4e511c65118d5e819586fb90bf48929a5bce7e11be187a1e71981",
    "providerReceipt": {
     "path": "outputs/historical-backfill-2026-08-08-crossref/raw-receipts/crossref-015-00002.json",
     "sha256": "1d396aa45242d85d389a0d245ebbcef7ad23cd94a226a80735ab00cb1a067299",
     "byteLength": 1559532
    }
   },
   "independentRationale": "The exact proposition is present in the live Crossref abstract and the deposited reference list contains no Kaal-authored reference; the relationship is limited to the independently stated proposition.",
   "nonOverlap": {
    "candidateIdMatches": 0,
    "canonicalUrlMatches": 0,
    "propositionHashMatches": 0
   }
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed batch and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "d95d698287977992ca4741798bf083d72579de8eccc254cfa77825ed8b97995d"
}