{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-197",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-197",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Token Based Voting Systems Afe06C93A7",
 "text": "Token-based Voting Systems states that standard token-vote aggregation can produce oligarchic dominance or voter apathy. This independently corresponds to Kaal's criticism that one-token-one-vote concentrates power in large holders and produces suboptimal outcomes. The abstract proposition does not quantify either pathology or establish that every token-voting design has it.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "agreement",
 "keywords": [
  "tokenomics",
  "governance-design",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level agreement.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.62.",
  "The primary mapping cleared the automated ambiguity test; substantive scope remains review-bound.",
  "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
  "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
  "The source states that standard token-vote aggregation can produce oligarchic dominance or voter apathy. This independently corresponds to Kaal's mechanism-level criticism that one-token-one-vote concentrates power in large holders and produces suboptimal outcomes, while the proposition does not quantify either pathology or establish that every token-voting design has it."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Token-based Voting Systems",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6269359"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:3652481-030",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3652481-030",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations – Internal Governance and External Legal Design (2020). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3652481",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations – Internal Governance and External Legal Design",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2020",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=3652481",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "530b3a40c244aeca2eb4c53f4c9b4d6b2962bd6be9f92b4ebe17139c17f4c0e0"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3652481-030"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Token-based Voting Systems",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6269359"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-08:continuous-crossref-0022-oldest-0050-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-197",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-197.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-08-08:56fb002657ecfb92ca2c",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level agreement",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.62,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source states that standard token-vote aggregation can produce oligarchic dominance or voter apathy. This independently corresponds to Kaal's mechanism-level criticism that one-token-one-vote concentrates power in large holders and produces suboptimal outcomes, while the proposition does not quantify either pathology or establish that every token-voting design has it.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.2139/ssrn.6269359",
  "queryId": "concept:f33140c221de",
  "queryText": "token voting governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6269359",
  "doi": "10.2139/ssrn.6269359",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.2139/ssrn.6269359",
   "Crossref": "10.2139/ssrn.6269359"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-09T19:17:18.240Z",
  "providerPage": 1,
  "rawObservationSha256": "73185c3ebc2b9809a8f194c18b5a48c774232a8314e27c900330b5d5a2f84259",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "a8c552eb32a42bdb6b0d0b8149fa742f13610af3e2fbd518fa6bda5e1fba12eb",
  "inputLine": 10502,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00001",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.2139/ssrn.6269359",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Enrico Bozzo",
   "Massimo Franceschet"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2026-01-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.2139/ssrn.6269359",
   "crossref:10.2139/ssrn.6269359",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6269359",
   "title:8d3c2ed403e688ccda8a479d",
   "proposition:21e1000189064190c393dfc3445f690ab8ebebeec70ca0d0e871248bf48d6160"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Token-based voting systems are increasingly adopted in digital governance contexts such as decentralized autonomous organizations and participatory budgeting, yet their standard aggregation rules often lead to undesirable outcomes, including oligarchic dominance or voter apathy.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "8c61c4d4642f14de3e26de9b51b4466d15b717ba0894752dcdc3351a9f69ebb9",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 0,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3652481-030",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3652481-030",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.62,
    "method": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
    "whyRelevant": "The source states that standard token-vote aggregation can produce oligarchic dominance or voter apathy. This independently corresponds to Kaal's mechanism-level criticism that one-token-one-vote concentrates power in large holders and produces suboptimal outcomes, while the proposition does not quantify either pathology or establish that every token-voting design has it.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "disposition": "retained",
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-continuous-crossref-substantive-review-v1",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-10T04:24:35.934Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex continuous substantive reviewer",
   "rationale": "The source states that standard token-vote aggregation can produce oligarchic dominance or voter apathy. This independently corresponds to Kaal's mechanism-level criticism that one-token-one-vote concentrates power in large holders and produces suboptimal outcomes, while the proposition does not quantify either pathology or establish that every token-voting design has it.",
   "limitations": [
    "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
    "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
    "The source states that standard token-vote aggregation can produce oligarchic dominance or voter apathy. This independently corresponds to Kaal's mechanism-level criticism that one-token-one-vote concentrates power in large holders and produces suboptimal outcomes, while the proposition does not quantify either pathology or establish that every token-voting design has it."
   ],
   "sourceIdentity": {
    "status": "verified",
    "source": "Crossref REST work record",
    "doi": "10.2139/ssrn.6269359",
    "title": "Token-based Voting Systems",
    "authors": [
     "Enrico Bozzo",
     "Massimo Franceschet"
    ],
    "language": "unavailable",
    "publisher": "Elsevier BV",
    "checkedAt": "2026-08-10T04:24:35.934Z",
    "responseBodySha256": "d2d69dd97e381928ad3551f900d63bc500977a17a77fd693f3f7b43d46620183",
    "providerReceipt": {
     "path": "outputs/historical-backfill-2026-08-08-crossref/raw-receipts/crossref-022-00001.json",
     "sha256": "da359366b5064f18d2d6e19668e33b13f6ad13d427467b6e52a1c8799adece14",
     "byteLength": 1898648
    }
   },
   "independentRationale": "The exact proposition is present in the live Crossref abstract and the deposited reference list contains no Kaal-authored reference; the relationship is limited to the independently stated proposition.",
   "nonOverlap": {
    "candidateIdMatches": 0,
    "canonicalUrlMatches": 0,
    "propositionHashMatches": 0
   }
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed batch and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "2187df4ff0d708365cb4480fe5cfe6e98d52096cb5ec94460f322c5cf065ab57"
}