{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-204",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-204",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Does Proxy Voting Really Promote Corporate Sustainability 3Fc4A247Cc",
 "text": "Does proxy voting really promote corporate sustainability? reports that proxy-voting agents attribute inconsistent guideline compliance partly to portfolio managers not being aligned with their clients' stated sustainability commitments. This independently instantiates Kaal's manager-agent and shareholder-principal misalignment mechanism. The abstract does not quantify residual loss or establish that every proxy-voting failure is caused by misalignment.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "agreement",
 "keywords": [
  "corporate-governance",
  "compliance",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level agreement.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.62.",
  "The primary mapping cleared the automated ambiguity test; substantive scope remains review-bound.",
  "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
  "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
  "The source reports that proxy-voting agents attribute inconsistent sustainability-guideline compliance partly to portfolio managers not being aligned with their clients' stated commitments. This independently instantiates Kaal's manager-agent and shareholder-principal misalignment mechanism, while the abstract does not quantify residual loss or establish that every proxy-voting failure is caused by misalignment."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Does proxy voting really promote corporate sustainability?",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12464"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:3373393-009",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3373393-009",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Blockchain Solutions for Agency Problems in Corporate Governance (2019). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3373393",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Blockchain Solutions for Agency Problems in Corporate Governance",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2019",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=3373393",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "4d1424b9ba9aff8a61bc7a0dddd02cded93785e5843685dde76c07dcdb23961e"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3373393-009"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Does proxy voting really promote corporate sustainability?",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12464"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-08:continuous-crossref-0022-oldest-0050-0002-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-204",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-204.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-08-08:2276f943881c630e33c8",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level agreement",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.62,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source reports that proxy-voting agents attribute inconsistent sustainability-guideline compliance partly to portfolio managers not being aligned with their clients' stated commitments. This independently instantiates Kaal's manager-agent and shareholder-principal misalignment mechanism, while the abstract does not quantify residual loss or establish that every proxy-voting failure is caused by misalignment.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.1111/corg.12464",
  "queryId": "concept:f33140c221de",
  "queryText": "token voting governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12464",
  "doi": "10.1111/corg.12464",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.1111/corg.12464",
   "Crossref": "10.1111/corg.12464"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-09T19:17:18.240Z",
  "providerPage": 1,
  "rawObservationSha256": "c7b50e02390368f6d29fb95ecacd783c2fa8f0c5820f743e7fa8916490529271",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "a8c552eb32a42bdb6b0d0b8149fa742f13610af3e2fbd518fa6bda5e1fba12eb",
  "inputLine": 10613,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00001",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.1111/corg.12464",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Julie Bernard",
   "Olivier Boiral",
   "Laurence Guillaumie",
   "Marie‐Christine Brotherton"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2023-05-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.1111/corg.12464",
   "crossref:10.1111/corg.12464",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12464",
   "title:60c3f0a42c965a7b1ccec713",
   "proposition:a02b9d5063f3008f4565f90de757500250f791fd85f412678a38a5831778174c"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Proxy voting agents are expected to follow the guidelines; they explain their non‐compliance by pointing out the guidelines' vagueness, the opacity of current proxy voting practices, and portfolio managers not necessarily aligned with their clients' stated sustainability commitments, along with their perceptions of what is in the best interest of the clients.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "9a1998dd09d8bfe3993152bcf897ded966183d0353d3730e862b412d92ff3d49",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 1,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3373393-009",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3373393-009",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.62,
    "method": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
    "whyRelevant": "The source reports that proxy-voting agents attribute inconsistent sustainability-guideline compliance partly to portfolio managers not being aligned with their clients' stated commitments. This independently instantiates Kaal's manager-agent and shareholder-principal misalignment mechanism, while the abstract does not quantify residual loss or establish that every proxy-voting failure is caused by misalignment.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "disposition": "retained",
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-continuous-crossref-substantive-review-v1",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-10T05:24:19.176Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex continuous substantive reviewer",
   "rationale": "The source reports that proxy-voting agents attribute inconsistent sustainability-guideline compliance partly to portfolio managers not being aligned with their clients' stated commitments. This independently instantiates Kaal's manager-agent and shareholder-principal misalignment mechanism, while the abstract does not quantify residual loss or establish that every proxy-voting failure is caused by misalignment.",
   "limitations": [
    "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
    "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
    "The source reports that proxy-voting agents attribute inconsistent sustainability-guideline compliance partly to portfolio managers not being aligned with their clients' stated commitments. This independently instantiates Kaal's manager-agent and shareholder-principal misalignment mechanism, while the abstract does not quantify residual loss or establish that every proxy-voting failure is caused by misalignment."
   ],
   "sourceIdentity": {
    "status": "verified",
    "source": "Crossref REST work record",
    "doi": "10.1111/corg.12464",
    "title": "Does proxy voting really promote corporate sustainability?",
    "authors": [
     "Julie Bernard",
     "Olivier Boiral",
     "Laurence Guillaumie",
     "Marie‐Christine Brotherton"
    ],
    "language": "en",
    "publisher": "Wiley",
    "checkedAt": "2026-08-10T05:24:19.176Z",
    "responseBodySha256": "38cb28a5b68db33d8641a7112ca2a2e8d0344c134326fab0375f050aac395a01",
    "providerReceipt": {
     "path": "outputs/historical-backfill-2026-08-08-crossref/raw-receipts/crossref-022-00001.json",
     "sha256": "da359366b5064f18d2d6e19668e33b13f6ad13d427467b6e52a1c8799adece14",
     "byteLength": 1898648
    }
   },
   "independentRationale": "The exact proposition is present in the live Crossref abstract and the deposited reference list contains no Kaal-authored reference; the relationship is limited to the independently stated proposition.",
   "nonOverlap": {
    "candidateIdMatches": 0,
    "canonicalUrlMatches": 0,
    "propositionHashMatches": 0
   }
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed batch and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "5453870ef5e152c3573b6561f4efb65dfda883547cf04a3ab0105af0b456909c"
}