Qualification: Impact of Restricted Voting Share Structure on Firm Value and Performance
Impact of Restricted Voting Share Structure on Firm Value and Performance finds, in a ten-year Canadian panel, that RVS firms did not have lower value, operating performance, or stock performance than comparable non-RVS firms. This qualifies Kaal's U.S. cross-sectional claim that fewer defensive mechanisms correlate with higher valuation and performance. The result is jurisdiction- and structure-specific and does not show that RVS is harmless in every governance environment.
Affirmed commentary position. This record extends a source-bound scholarly claim but is not a verbatim paper claim.
Holds when
Current debate
Scholarly basis
Evidence and mapping
Topics
governance-designempirical-evidenceeconomicshistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref
Provenance
Verify