{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-207",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-207",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Proxy Favors Confidential Proxy Voting With Institutional Dual Holders 21Fd767F2E",
 "text": "Proxy favors reports that the reciprocity relationship between firms and institutional dual holders does not exist when confidential proxy voting is in place. This supplies a concrete governance-control mechanism for one conflict channel consistent with Kaal's broader principal-agent misalignment claim. The abstract does not show that confidentiality removes residual agency loss generally.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "corporate-governance",
  "compliance",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level extension.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.62.",
  "The primary mapping cleared the automated ambiguity test; substantive scope remains review-bound.",
  "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
  "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
  "The source reports that the reciprocity relationship between firms and institutional dual holders disappears under confidential proxy voting. This supplies a concrete governance-control mechanism for one conflict channel consistent with Kaal's broader principal-agent misalignment claim, while it does not show that confidentiality removes residual agency loss generally."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Proxy favors: Confidential proxy voting with institutional dual holders",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12557"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:3373393-009",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3373393-009",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Blockchain Solutions for Agency Problems in Corporate Governance (2019). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3373393",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Blockchain Solutions for Agency Problems in Corporate Governance",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2019",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=3373393",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "4d1424b9ba9aff8a61bc7a0dddd02cded93785e5843685dde76c07dcdb23961e"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3373393-009"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Proxy favors: Confidential proxy voting with institutional dual holders",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12557"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-08:continuous-crossref-0022-oldest-0050-0002-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-207",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-207.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-08-08:ff63c7d291bb37693d17",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level extension",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.62,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source reports that the reciprocity relationship between firms and institutional dual holders disappears under confidential proxy voting. This supplies a concrete governance-control mechanism for one conflict channel consistent with Kaal's broader principal-agent misalignment claim, while it does not show that confidentiality removes residual agency loss generally.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.1111/corg.12557",
  "queryId": "concept:f33140c221de",
  "queryText": "token voting governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12557",
  "doi": "10.1111/corg.12557",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.1111/corg.12557",
   "Crossref": "10.1111/corg.12557"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-09T19:17:18.240Z",
  "providerPage": 1,
  "rawObservationSha256": "aa3f0e6f8e6548a4618daf47664e40b8d1a492074bafdf71d909a34c947e3f04",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "a8c552eb32a42bdb6b0d0b8149fa742f13610af3e2fbd518fa6bda5e1fba12eb",
  "inputLine": 10666,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00001",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.1111/corg.12557",
  "workAuthors": [
   "William J. Becker",
   "Sattar Mansi",
   "Maryam Nazari",
   "John K. Wald"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2024-05-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.1111/corg.12557",
   "crossref:10.1111/corg.12557",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12557",
   "title:d853e6e0c6fa27069afbe95b",
   "proposition:fd6654b1a790458c3bfe082e8a50c31b699a909a2e277e927c22c725d474240a"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "This reciprocity relation does not exist if the firm has confidential voting in place.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "d09f2ec8b9e2d3308a427e845fd215770230af3409f10aed6b5ea4b96664ea81",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 1,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3373393-009",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3373393-009",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.62,
    "method": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
    "whyRelevant": "The source reports that the reciprocity relationship between firms and institutional dual holders disappears under confidential proxy voting. This supplies a concrete governance-control mechanism for one conflict channel consistent with Kaal's broader principal-agent misalignment claim, while it does not show that confidentiality removes residual agency loss generally.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "disposition": "retained",
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-continuous-crossref-substantive-review-v1",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-10T05:24:19.176Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex continuous substantive reviewer",
   "rationale": "The source reports that the reciprocity relationship between firms and institutional dual holders disappears under confidential proxy voting. This supplies a concrete governance-control mechanism for one conflict channel consistent with Kaal's broader principal-agent misalignment claim, while it does not show that confidentiality removes residual agency loss generally.",
   "limitations": [
    "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
    "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
    "The source reports that the reciprocity relationship between firms and institutional dual holders disappears under confidential proxy voting. This supplies a concrete governance-control mechanism for one conflict channel consistent with Kaal's broader principal-agent misalignment claim, while it does not show that confidentiality removes residual agency loss generally."
   ],
   "sourceIdentity": {
    "status": "verified",
    "source": "Crossref REST work record",
    "doi": "10.1111/corg.12557",
    "title": "Proxy favors: Confidential proxy voting with institutional dual holders",
    "authors": [
     "William J. Becker",
     "Sattar Mansi",
     "Maryam Nazari",
     "John K. Wald"
    ],
    "language": "en",
    "publisher": "Wiley",
    "checkedAt": "2026-08-10T05:24:19.176Z",
    "responseBodySha256": "0e99cb6bc677dfb18d225b65feec9978162179489adeac05302eccf42860fb68",
    "providerReceipt": {
     "path": "outputs/historical-backfill-2026-08-08-crossref/raw-receipts/crossref-022-00001.json",
     "sha256": "da359366b5064f18d2d6e19668e33b13f6ad13d427467b6e52a1c8799adece14",
     "byteLength": 1898648
    }
   },
   "independentRationale": "The exact proposition is present in the live Crossref abstract and the deposited reference list contains no Kaal-authored reference; the relationship is limited to the independently stated proposition.",
   "nonOverlap": {
    "candidateIdMatches": 0,
    "canonicalUrlMatches": 0,
    "propositionHashMatches": 0
   }
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed batch and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "65604ce094f638508553250062c83a3fac57ae262291e984ecbf2d718ed5d749"
}