{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-209",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-209",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming The Differential Effect Of Regulatory Signals On Shareholder Dissent The Case Of 67968718Bc",
 "text": "The Differential Effect of Regulatory Signals on Shareholder Dissent finds that a disclosure-rule change affected shareholder dissent differently as domestic versus foreign institutional ownership increased. This supplies an empirical example of institution-specific reactions to regulatory information relevant to Kaal's dynamic-rulemaking mechanism. The abstract does not establish that the regulator used the response as feedback or adjusted a later rule.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "institutional-design",
  "dynamic-regulation",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level extension.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.62.",
  "The primary mapping cleared the automated ambiguity test; substantive scope remains review-bound.",
  "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
  "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
  "The source finds that a disclosure-rule change affected shareholder dissent differently as domestic versus foreign institutional ownership increased. This supplies an empirical example of institution-specific reactions to regulatory information relevant to Kaal's dynamic-rulemaking mechanism, while it does not establish that the regulator used the response as feedback or adjusted a later rule."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "The Differential Effect of Regulatory Signals on Shareholder Dissent: The Case of Shareholder Voting in Director Elections",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12640"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:2273857-049",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2273857-049",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation of the Financial Services Industry (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2273857",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation of the Financial Services Industry",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2013",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=2273857",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "e7cb3dea40593135acc99a9b00690138fe01020514ebf388f5140e1b0e59e82a"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2273857-049"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "The Differential Effect of Regulatory Signals on Shareholder Dissent: The Case of Shareholder Voting in Director Elections",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12640"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-08:continuous-crossref-0022-oldest-0050-0002-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-209",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-209.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-08-08:9abc2cbee94114309fe9",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level extension",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.62,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source finds that a disclosure-rule change affected shareholder dissent differently as domestic versus foreign institutional ownership increased. This supplies an empirical example of institution-specific reactions to regulatory information relevant to Kaal's dynamic-rulemaking mechanism, while it does not establish that the regulator used the response as feedback or adjusted a later rule.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.1111/corg.12640",
  "queryId": "concept:f33140c221de",
  "queryText": "token voting governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12640",
  "doi": "10.1111/corg.12640",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.1111/corg.12640",
   "Crossref": "10.1111/corg.12640"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-09T19:17:18.240Z",
  "providerPage": 1,
  "rawObservationSha256": "0d701451b427c60a3a3dea205d6b3dd4623cdac61c7b46438680b6be91ec001a",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "a8c552eb32a42bdb6b0d0b8149fa742f13610af3e2fbd518fa6bda5e1fba12eb",
  "inputLine": 10696,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00001",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.1111/corg.12640",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Daisuke Uchida",
   "Toru Yoshikawa"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2025-09-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.1111/corg.12640",
   "crossref:10.1111/corg.12640",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12640",
   "title:ab818f0cabb64bf7d3b8e4b8",
   "proposition:39b24bbab23983642d0f94d4e5226c7cb4c9c5ee23b262fe0ff437360475f981"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Research Findings/Insights We find that the effect of a regulatory change in the disclosure of voting records on shareholder dissent is strengthened as shareholdings by domestic institutional investors increase, while it is mitigated as shareholdings by foreign institutional investors increase.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "9eb466941a1002a4e4ba8797c534b0a34c4c0ff9485e6f813fbc6c636e3f63b0",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 0,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2273857-049",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2273857-049",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.62,
    "method": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
    "whyRelevant": "The source finds that a disclosure-rule change affected shareholder dissent differently as domestic versus foreign institutional ownership increased. This supplies an empirical example of institution-specific reactions to regulatory information relevant to Kaal's dynamic-rulemaking mechanism, while it does not establish that the regulator used the response as feedback or adjusted a later rule.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "disposition": "retained",
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-continuous-crossref-substantive-review-v1",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-10T05:24:19.176Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex continuous substantive reviewer",
   "rationale": "The source finds that a disclosure-rule change affected shareholder dissent differently as domestic versus foreign institutional ownership increased. This supplies an empirical example of institution-specific reactions to regulatory information relevant to Kaal's dynamic-rulemaking mechanism, while it does not establish that the regulator used the response as feedback or adjusted a later rule.",
   "limitations": [
    "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
    "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
    "The source finds that a disclosure-rule change affected shareholder dissent differently as domestic versus foreign institutional ownership increased. This supplies an empirical example of institution-specific reactions to regulatory information relevant to Kaal's dynamic-rulemaking mechanism, while it does not establish that the regulator used the response as feedback or adjusted a later rule."
   ],
   "sourceIdentity": {
    "status": "verified",
    "source": "Crossref REST work record",
    "doi": "10.1111/corg.12640",
    "title": "The Differential Effect of Regulatory Signals on Shareholder Dissent: The Case of Shareholder Voting in Director Elections",
    "authors": [
     "Daisuke Uchida",
     "Toru Yoshikawa"
    ],
    "language": "en",
    "publisher": "Wiley",
    "checkedAt": "2026-08-10T05:24:19.176Z",
    "responseBodySha256": "046007e3c058f6449ec73bee66624807f76c04e4aa65991db1ae57cda8ab4499",
    "providerReceipt": {
     "path": "outputs/historical-backfill-2026-08-08-crossref/raw-receipts/crossref-022-00001.json",
     "sha256": "da359366b5064f18d2d6e19668e33b13f6ad13d427467b6e52a1c8799adece14",
     "byteLength": 1898648
    }
   },
   "independentRationale": "The exact proposition is present in the live Crossref abstract and the deposited reference list contains no Kaal-authored reference; the relationship is limited to the independently stated proposition.",
   "nonOverlap": {
    "candidateIdMatches": 0,
    "canonicalUrlMatches": 0,
    "propositionHashMatches": 0
   }
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed batch and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "0a4f9606d63d10eeaeb4cd0a84367c08c99af4bec295a61899af031842b6a057"
}