{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-211",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-211",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Balancing Power In Decentralized Governance Quadratic Voting And Information Agg 5614596A7F",
 "text": "Balancing Power in Decentralized Governance reports that quadratic voting with convex costs optimally aggregates voter preferences and outperforms linear voting when voters have complete information. This independently supports Kaal's preference-intensity mechanism for quadratic allocation. The result is conditional on complete information and does not establish that Kaal's capped allocation is identical to the studied mechanism.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "agreement",
 "keywords": [
  "governance-design",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level agreement.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.62.",
  "The primary mapping cleared the automated ambiguity test; substantive scope remains review-bound.",
  "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
  "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
  "The source states that quadratic voting with convex costs optimally aggregates voter preferences and outperforms linear voting when voters have complete information. This independently supports Kaal's preference-intensity mechanism for quadratic allocation, while the result is conditional on complete information and does not establish that Kaal's capped allocation is identical to the studied mechanism."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Balancing Power in Decentralized Governance: Quadratic Voting and Information Aggregation",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.08469"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:3709041-017",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3709041-017",
  "citation": "Kaal, Blockchain Technology for Good (2020). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3709041",
  "paper": "Kaal, Blockchain Technology for Good",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2020",
  "ssrn": null,
  "source_pdf_sha256": "5216a7bca45a48e3bef11ec524936e66af737c0fd66271e9f6866dc20a4482cc"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3709041-017"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Balancing Power in Decentralized Governance: Quadratic Voting and Information Aggregation",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.08469"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-08:continuous-crossref-0022-final-0048-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-211",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-211.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-08-08:cee9323da12ab61835a6",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level agreement",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.62,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source states that quadratic voting with convex costs optimally aggregates voter preferences and outperforms linear voting when voters have complete information. This independently supports Kaal's preference-intensity mechanism for quadratic allocation, while the result is conditional on complete information and does not establish that Kaal's capped allocation is identical to the studied mechanism.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.1287/mnsc.2024.08469",
  "queryId": "concept:f33140c221de",
  "queryText": "token voting governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.08469",
  "doi": "10.1287/mnsc.2024.08469",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.1287/mnsc.2024.08469",
   "Crossref": "10.1287/mnsc.2024.08469"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-09T19:17:18.789Z",
  "providerPage": 2,
  "rawObservationSha256": "19ce6974b159323b029e934dbf1973212c56136d00fb3e048bec04ce5365606d",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "a8c552eb32a42bdb6b0d0b8149fa742f13610af3e2fbd518fa6bda5e1fba12eb",
  "inputLine": 10865,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00001",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.1287/mnsc.2024.08469",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Alon Benhaim",
   "Brett Hemenway Falk",
   "Gerry Tsoukalas"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2026-06-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.1287/mnsc.2024.08469",
   "crossref:10.1287/mnsc.2024.08469",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.08469",
   "title:4238e55b1946313f389fcc55",
   "proposition:04816fa957faf4e3765abb897cd19ed369d07606d6231a00df21b3c990492d1f"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "In decentralized governance, quadratic voting (QV)—where the cost of acquiring voting power is convex—optimally aggregates voter preferences, outperforming simpler linear voting (LV) mechanisms when voters have complete information.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "252861f4fca4ee8f5c9e231340dc736f297a099860f9bb6737cd11525fa2e52d",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 0,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3709041-017",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3709041-017",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.62,
    "method": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
    "whyRelevant": "The source states that quadratic voting with convex costs optimally aggregates voter preferences and outperforms linear voting when voters have complete information. This independently supports Kaal's preference-intensity mechanism for quadratic allocation, while the result is conditional on complete information and does not establish that Kaal's capped allocation is identical to the studied mechanism.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "disposition": "retained",
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-continuous-crossref-substantive-review-v1",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-10T06:26:09.583Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex continuous substantive reviewer",
   "rationale": "The source states that quadratic voting with convex costs optimally aggregates voter preferences and outperforms linear voting when voters have complete information. This independently supports Kaal's preference-intensity mechanism for quadratic allocation, while the result is conditional on complete information and does not establish that Kaal's capped allocation is identical to the studied mechanism.",
   "limitations": [
    "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
    "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
    "The source states that quadratic voting with convex costs optimally aggregates voter preferences and outperforms linear voting when voters have complete information. This independently supports Kaal's preference-intensity mechanism for quadratic allocation, while the result is conditional on complete information and does not establish that Kaal's capped allocation is identical to the studied mechanism."
   ],
   "sourceIdentity": {
    "status": "verified",
    "source": "Crossref REST work record",
    "doi": "10.1287/mnsc.2024.08469",
    "title": "Balancing Power in Decentralized Governance: Quadratic Voting and Information Aggregation",
    "authors": [
     "Alon Benhaim",
     "Brett Hemenway Falk",
     "Gerry Tsoukalas"
    ],
    "language": "en",
    "publisher": "Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)",
    "checkedAt": "2026-08-10T06:26:09.583Z",
    "responseBodySha256": "ffbda6b7a2c7fe1d8b8327773870dafa1924a67521181aae4818094eac6f7789",
    "providerReceipt": {
     "path": "outputs/historical-backfill-2026-08-08-crossref/raw-receipts/crossref-022-00002.json",
     "sha256": "a356d008b71cf9fe8ea4711642c313407a3531251a14fc25453b14e668b080bd",
     "byteLength": 1540067
    }
   },
   "independentRationale": "The exact proposition is present in the live Crossref abstract and the deposited reference list contains no Kaal-authored reference; the relationship is limited to the independently stated proposition.",
   "nonOverlap": {
    "candidateIdMatches": 0,
    "canonicalUrlMatches": 0,
    "propositionHashMatches": 0
   }
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed batch and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "71d64138ab4acf72f0a0020efbc517f2984ed711da690e60497cef1b774e3ccb"
}