{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-214",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-214",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Quadratic Voting And Member Voice In Dc Pension Schemes An Equitable Governance  A672Ec7Ce4",
 "text": "Quadratic Voting and Member Voice in DC Pension Schemes states that quadratic voting captures preference intensity by quadratically allocating voting credits rather than treating all preferences equally. This independently corresponds to Kaal's preference-intensity rationale for quadratic-style microdemocratic allocation. The proposition alone does not establish outcome superiority or implementation feasibility in pension governance.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "agreement",
 "keywords": [
  "governance-design",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level agreement.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.62.",
  "The primary mapping cleared the automated ambiguity test; substantive scope remains review-bound.",
  "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
  "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
  "The source states that quadratic voting captures preference intensity by quadratically allocating voting credits instead of treating all preferences equally. This independently corresponds to Kaal's preference-intensity rationale for quadratic-style microdemocratic allocation, while the proposition alone does not establish outcome superiority or implementation feasibility in pension governance."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Quadratic Voting and Member Voice in DC Pension Schemes: An Equitable Governance Response",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2026.10120"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:3709041-017",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3709041-017",
  "citation": "Kaal, Blockchain Technology for Good (2020). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3709041",
  "paper": "Kaal, Blockchain Technology for Good",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2020",
  "ssrn": null,
  "source_pdf_sha256": "5216a7bca45a48e3bef11ec524936e66af737c0fd66271e9f6866dc20a4482cc"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3709041-017"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Quadratic Voting and Member Voice in DC Pension Schemes: An Equitable Governance Response",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2026.10120"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-08:continuous-crossref-0022-final-0048-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-214",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-214.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-08-08:66e3fed95fa176b6bd03",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level agreement",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.62,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source states that quadratic voting captures preference intensity by quadratically allocating voting credits instead of treating all preferences equally. This independently corresponds to Kaal's preference-intensity rationale for quadratic-style microdemocratic allocation, while the proposition alone does not establish outcome superiority or implementation feasibility in pension governance.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.1017/err.2026.10120",
  "queryId": "concept:f33140c221de",
  "queryText": "token voting governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2026.10120",
  "doi": "10.1017/err.2026.10120",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.1017/err.2026.10120",
   "Crossref": "10.1017/err.2026.10120"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-09T19:17:18.789Z",
  "providerPage": 2,
  "rawObservationSha256": "f31a88d3a82f4a62213eeec26aeb4fc4c15b03e0576252e678f35e6db0b9cfa8",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "a8c552eb32a42bdb6b0d0b8149fa742f13610af3e2fbd518fa6bda5e1fba12eb",
  "inputLine": 10917,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00001",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.1017/err.2026.10120",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Eldar Khiavi",
   "Mahmood Bagheri"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2026-07-17",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.1017/err.2026.10120",
   "crossref:10.1017/err.2026.10120",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2026.10120",
   "title:bcebb0c5ec0852390493670b",
   "proposition:530849729cd85509deb8effd03bfbb2888f087871c1d8713b682c3fc5232fe45"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "QV captures preference intensity through a quadratic allocation of voting credits, rather than treating all preferences as equal.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "bb1a3f1daa1fc0d27d16294730d932753f4b9825dfa149e1e2cafe64906664f2",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 1,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3709041-017",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3709041-017",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.62,
    "method": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
    "whyRelevant": "The source states that quadratic voting captures preference intensity by quadratically allocating voting credits instead of treating all preferences equally. This independently corresponds to Kaal's preference-intensity rationale for quadratic-style microdemocratic allocation, while the proposition alone does not establish outcome superiority or implementation feasibility in pension governance.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "disposition": "retained",
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-continuous-crossref-substantive-review-v1",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-10T06:26:09.583Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex continuous substantive reviewer",
   "rationale": "The source states that quadratic voting captures preference intensity by quadratically allocating voting credits instead of treating all preferences equally. This independently corresponds to Kaal's preference-intensity rationale for quadratic-style microdemocratic allocation, while the proposition alone does not establish outcome superiority or implementation feasibility in pension governance.",
   "limitations": [
    "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
    "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
    "The source states that quadratic voting captures preference intensity by quadratically allocating voting credits instead of treating all preferences equally. This independently corresponds to Kaal's preference-intensity rationale for quadratic-style microdemocratic allocation, while the proposition alone does not establish outcome superiority or implementation feasibility in pension governance."
   ],
   "sourceIdentity": {
    "status": "verified",
    "source": "Crossref REST work record",
    "doi": "10.1017/err.2026.10120",
    "title": "Quadratic Voting and Member Voice in DC Pension Schemes: An Equitable Governance Response",
    "authors": [
     "Eldar Khiavi",
     "Mahmood Bagheri"
    ],
    "language": "en",
    "publisher": "Cambridge University Press (CUP)",
    "checkedAt": "2026-08-10T06:26:09.583Z",
    "responseBodySha256": "3d8c6ab8acae80ba04ae2a4d627eedfd928e66a493fa1b6d2ddfe9e8ce171340",
    "providerReceipt": {
     "path": "outputs/historical-backfill-2026-08-08-crossref/raw-receipts/crossref-022-00002.json",
     "sha256": "a356d008b71cf9fe8ea4711642c313407a3531251a14fc25453b14e668b080bd",
     "byteLength": 1540067
    }
   },
   "independentRationale": "The exact proposition is present in the live Crossref abstract and the deposited reference list contains no Kaal-authored reference; the relationship is limited to the independently stated proposition.",
   "nonOverlap": {
    "candidateIdMatches": 0,
    "canonicalUrlMatches": 0,
    "propositionHashMatches": 0
   }
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed batch and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "35d364cdfddcdf39f6574b0562e70af49e5e2e99d9b277376ac8aac2a31383c5"
}