{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-220",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-220",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Digitization Of Transaction Terms Within Tce Strong Smart Contract As A New Mode C5F2Fa72F4",
 "text": "Digitization of Transaction Terms within TCE defines strong smart contracts as agreements with automatic execution and enforcement that are not reversible by courts. This independently supports the limited-legal-recourse mechanism in Kaal's claim. The retained proposition does not establish the frequency or consequences of failed execution.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "agreement",
 "keywords": [
  "smart-contracts",
  "law-and-legal-systems",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level agreement.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.62.",
  "The primary mapping cleared the automated ambiguity test; substantive scope remains review-bound.",
  "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
  "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
  "The source defines strong smart contracts as agreements with automatic execution and enforcement that are not reversible by courts. This independently supports the limited-legal-recourse mechanism in Kaal's claim, while the proposition does not establish the frequency or consequences of failed execution."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Digitization of Transaction Terms within TCE: Strong Smart Contract as a New Mode of Transaction Governance",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2023/17818"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:3406323-031",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3406323-031",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralization - A Primer on the New Economy (2019). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3406323",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralization - A Primer on the New Economy",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2019",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=3406323",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "6293780b57a1ae1de17ec00f99cc94295d4f72ea4d08b17a5c08c44772b221db"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3406323-031"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Digitization of Transaction Terms within TCE: Strong Smart Contract as a New Mode of Transaction Governance",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2023/17818"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-08:continuous-crossref-0027-global-unique-oldest-0050-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-220",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-220.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-08-08:98296ad266ef8b66ccab",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level agreement",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.62,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source defines strong smart contracts as agreements with automatic execution and enforcement that are not reversible by courts. This independently supports the limited-legal-recourse mechanism in Kaal's claim, while the proposition does not establish the frequency or consequences of failed execution.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.25300/misq/2023/17818",
  "queryId": "concept:bf360546dbb3",
  "queryText": "smart contract governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2023/17818",
  "doi": "10.25300/misq/2023/17818",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.25300/misq/2023/17818",
   "Crossref": "10.25300/misq/2023/17818"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-10T00:19:00.999Z",
  "providerPage": 1,
  "rawObservationSha256": "0c3e12df25af856814ba79e450bf81e490388f11b60ad9c6edb058f6ae28cf45",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "e4ab6fa1b9ad6bc48e1a0898d7fb7b6dba339b5297c75a5297c733d2132d0f98",
  "inputLine": 13070,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00001",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.25300/misq/2023/17818",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Hanna Halaburda",
   "Natalia Levina",
   "Semi Min"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2024-06-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.25300/misq/2023/17818",
   "crossref:10.25300/misq/2023/17818",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2023/17818",
   "title:09ae5e014cba35cb65d89de7",
   "proposition:6ff66ef03a029791b2734bf2ede7e39d44894e7fcf1be0376434c1a9d1776023"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "We then draw on legal scholarship to analyze how strong smart contracts, which refer to agreements with automatic execution and enforcement that are not reversible by courts, rely on a new level of digitization of transaction terms.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "da567d09416ffccb23f73f92d4d821858a009cb13e5a1ff84225cb89b5fb0297",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 1,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3406323-031",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3406323-031",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.62,
    "method": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
    "whyRelevant": "The source defines strong smart contracts as agreements with automatic execution and enforcement that are not reversible by courts. This independently supports the limited-legal-recourse mechanism in Kaal's claim, while the proposition does not establish the frequency or consequences of failed execution.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "disposition": "retained",
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-continuous-crossref-substantive-review-v1",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-10T10:29:23.434Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex continuous substantive reviewer",
   "rationale": "The source defines strong smart contracts as agreements with automatic execution and enforcement that are not reversible by courts. This independently supports the limited-legal-recourse mechanism in Kaal's claim, while the proposition does not establish the frequency or consequences of failed execution.",
   "limitations": [
    "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
    "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
    "The source defines strong smart contracts as agreements with automatic execution and enforcement that are not reversible by courts. This independently supports the limited-legal-recourse mechanism in Kaal's claim, while the proposition does not establish the frequency or consequences of failed execution."
   ],
   "sourceIdentity": {
    "status": "verified",
    "source": "Crossref REST work record",
    "doi": "10.25300/misq/2023/17818",
    "title": "Digitization of Transaction Terms within TCE: Strong Smart Contract as a New Mode of Transaction Governance",
    "authors": [
     "Hanna Halaburda",
     "Natalia Levina",
     "Semi Min"
    ],
    "language": "en",
    "publisher": "MIS Quarterly",
    "checkedAt": "2026-08-10T10:29:23.434Z",
    "responseBodySha256": "27bdf49907630b7eb8522050e2c606f4ebdc229deb42164ddf6f236bc15c7a8f",
    "providerReceipt": {
     "path": "outputs/historical-backfill-2026-08-08-crossref/raw-receipts/crossref-027-00001.json",
     "sha256": "ac3f0be9e66f4e159c00e37fde2c27135d649562a615b3bc9ecc896f88cd5296",
     "byteLength": 2515276
    }
   },
   "independentRationale": "The exact proposition is present in the live Crossref abstract and the deposited reference list contains no Kaal-authored reference; the relationship is limited to the independently stated proposition.",
   "nonOverlap": {
    "candidateIdMatches": 0,
    "canonicalUrlMatches": 0,
    "propositionHashMatches": 0
   }
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed batch and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "bd2c19e66661836d4880b107f69b66c2fe4b6e82766a4a50e814822052776e67"
}