{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-229",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-229",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Preserving Flow Table Integrity In Openflow Networks Through Smart Contract A1424F2654",
 "text": "Preserving Flow Table Integrity in OpenFlow Networks through Smart Contract states that storing OpenFlow rules in a distributed ledger protects them against malicious tampering. This independently supports the tamper-resistant-record element in Kaal's four-part reputation-infrastructure claim. The abstract concerns network flow rules and does not establish the verification, scoring, or non-transferability elements.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "agreement",
 "keywords": [
  "reputation",
  "decentralization",
  "blockchain",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level agreement.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.62.",
  "The primary mapping cleared the automated ambiguity test; substantive scope remains review-bound.",
  "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
  "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
  "The source states that storing OpenFlow rules in a distributed ledger protects them against malicious tampering. This independently supports the tamper-resistant-record element in Kaal's four-part reputation-infrastructure claim, while it concerns network flow rules and does not establish the other verification, scoring, or non-transferability elements."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Preserving Flow Table Integrity in OpenFlow Networks through Smart Contract",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3254673/v1"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:6607458-034",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/6607458-034",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Computative Economics A Framework for Economic Analysis under Computational Abundance (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6607458",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Computative Economics A Framework for Economic Analysis under Computational Abundance",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2026",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=6607458",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "75cca35350378eb8904866d068b5d2f3e1504629e6031457ce6c12152a88e3e8"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/6607458-034"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Preserving Flow Table Integrity in OpenFlow Networks through Smart Contract",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3254673/v1"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-08:continuous-crossref-0027-global-unique-remainder-all-0025-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-229",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-229.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-08-08:a3b4fdbe19263ed53ba1",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level agreement",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.62,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source states that storing OpenFlow rules in a distributed ledger protects them against malicious tampering. This independently supports the tamper-resistant-record element in Kaal's four-part reputation-infrastructure claim, while it concerns network flow rules and does not establish the other verification, scoring, or non-transferability elements.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.21203/rs.3.rs-3254673/v1",
  "queryId": "concept:bf360546dbb3",
  "queryText": "smart contract governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3254673/v1",
  "doi": "10.21203/rs.3.rs-3254673/v1",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.21203/rs.3.rs-3254673/v1",
   "Crossref": "10.21203/rs.3.rs-3254673/v1"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-10T00:19:00.999Z",
  "providerPage": 1,
  "rawObservationSha256": "decb38a86b0bbfd56de889cfde8f3137e7e475a9bd739ee0e5c570fdfc374451",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "e4ab6fa1b9ad6bc48e1a0898d7fb7b6dba339b5297c75a5297c733d2132d0f98",
  "inputLine": 13371,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00001",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3254673/v1",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Birglang Bargayary",
   "Nabajyoti Medhi"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2023-08-18",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3254673/v1",
   "crossref:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3254673/v1",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3254673/v1",
   "title:4d933d9fbcd9083c8f4b629a",
   "proposition:57760e0ff624b48ae5dc796202e75de72dc28f12600ebedd3b5aee7bfac86c9d"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Blockchain provides us with a way to protect against malicious tampering with flow rules by storing them in the distributed ledger.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "5bb9a3dac6874ab61965837e79d2cc3e670d70e9337c360d7f0b2574f7796669",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 1,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:6607458-034",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/6607458-034",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.62,
    "method": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
    "whyRelevant": "The source states that storing OpenFlow rules in a distributed ledger protects them against malicious tampering. This independently supports the tamper-resistant-record element in Kaal's four-part reputation-infrastructure claim, while it concerns network flow rules and does not establish the other verification, scoring, or non-transferability elements.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "disposition": "retained",
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-continuous-crossref-substantive-review-v1",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-10T11:23:50.025Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex continuous substantive reviewer",
   "rationale": "The source states that storing OpenFlow rules in a distributed ledger protects them against malicious tampering. This independently supports the tamper-resistant-record element in Kaal's four-part reputation-infrastructure claim, while it concerns network flow rules and does not establish the other verification, scoring, or non-transferability elements.",
   "limitations": [
    "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
    "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
    "The source states that storing OpenFlow rules in a distributed ledger protects them against malicious tampering. This independently supports the tamper-resistant-record element in Kaal's four-part reputation-infrastructure claim, while it concerns network flow rules and does not establish the other verification, scoring, or non-transferability elements."
   ],
   "sourceIdentity": {
    "status": "verified",
    "source": "Crossref REST work record",
    "doi": "10.21203/rs.3.rs-3254673/v1",
    "title": "Preserving Flow Table Integrity in OpenFlow Networks through Smart Contract",
    "authors": [
     "Birglang Bargayary",
     "Nabajyoti Medhi"
    ],
    "language": "unavailable",
    "publisher": "Research Square Platform LLC",
    "checkedAt": "2026-08-10T11:23:50.025Z",
    "responseBodySha256": "84809fb47c2be1e5ec96c6b00d09dddc824952755fe59c1b6c2dc5be1a57d62b",
    "providerReceipt": {
     "path": "outputs/historical-backfill-2026-08-08-crossref/raw-receipts/crossref-027-00001.json",
     "sha256": "ac3f0be9e66f4e159c00e37fde2c27135d649562a615b3bc9ecc896f88cd5296",
     "byteLength": 2515276
    }
   },
   "independentRationale": "The exact proposition is present in the live Crossref abstract and the deposited reference list contains no Kaal-authored reference; the relationship is limited to the independently stated proposition.",
   "nonOverlap": {
    "candidateIdMatches": 0,
    "canonicalUrlMatches": 0,
    "propositionHashMatches": 0
   }
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed batch and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "c18b235c06a22649936f88c4acf6a516fdbe5a5540311cbb8c7607cbdf0edc33"
}