{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-231",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-231",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Signing A Smart Contract E9Af843C54",
 "text": "Signing a Smart Contract states that blockchain and smart-contract analysis must still consider participating parties, rights and obligations, and the formation prerequisites of offer and acceptance. This qualifies Kaal's claim that automated immutable execution disrupts conventional formation doctrine by showing that the source continues to treat offer and acceptance as necessary legal prerequisites. The abstract does not resolve how doctrine applies across jurisdictions.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "smart-contracts",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.62.",
  "The primary mapping cleared the automated ambiguity test; substantive scope remains review-bound.",
  "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
  "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
  "The source states that blockchain and smart-contract analysis must still consider participating parties, rights and obligations, and the formation prerequisites of offer and acceptance. This qualifies Kaal's claim that automated immutable execution disrupts conventional formation doctrine by showing that the source continues to treat offer and acceptance as necessary legal prerequisites; it does not resolve how doctrine applies across jurisdictions."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Signing a Smart Contract",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.36475/8.3.11"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:5554218-001",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5554218-001",
  "citation": "Furrer Andreas, Wulf A. Kaal, Universal Digital Law Codex (UDLC) Building the Legal Infrastructure for the Digital Era (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5554218",
  "paper": "Furrer Andreas, Wulf A. Kaal, Universal Digital Law Codex (UDLC) Building the Legal Infrastructure for the Digital Era",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2025",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=5554218",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "55738b4035a91b70aa2ddaa127552fe4b373ec641afee2719fbdcabebdcbea44"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5554218-001"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Signing a Smart Contract",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.36475/8.3.11"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-08:continuous-crossref-0027-global-unique-remainder-all-0025-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-231",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-231.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-08-08:195a7a446939c1899c2d",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.62,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source states that blockchain and smart-contract analysis must still consider participating parties, rights and obligations, and the formation prerequisites of offer and acceptance. This qualifies Kaal's claim that automated immutable execution disrupts conventional formation doctrine by showing that the source continues to treat offer and acceptance as necessary legal prerequisites; it does not resolve how doctrine applies across jurisdictions.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.36475/8.3.11",
  "queryId": "concept:bf360546dbb3",
  "queryText": "smart contract governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.36475/8.3.11",
  "doi": "10.36475/8.3.11",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.36475/8.3.11",
   "Crossref": "10.36475/8.3.11"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-10T00:19:00.999Z",
  "providerPage": 1,
  "rawObservationSha256": "f5f54335daf0263ee4bbf23c21de711c9690b1837b020b058a68ab14b86b6184",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "e4ab6fa1b9ad6bc48e1a0898d7fb7b6dba339b5297c75a5297c733d2132d0f98",
  "inputLine": 13426,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00001",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.36475/8.3.11",
  "workAuthors": [],
  "workPublishedAt": "2022-09-30",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.36475/8.3.11",
   "crossref:10.36475/8.3.11",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.36475/8.3.11",
   "title:deecb34d4135db8e3ab0775e",
   "proposition:66c2e5984c8844bbb167489f421a578538cca189f546e51ff75b50420891ffde"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "When we talk about blockchain and smart contracts, it is necessary to consider the parties participating in them, their rights and obligations, as well as the prerequisites for concluding a smart contract, namely, offer and acceptance.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "2bafc62ae0cdf9f79995562cafff9548c3f25a0141146de2d545090df069adc4",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 0,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5554218-001",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5554218-001",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.62,
    "method": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
    "whyRelevant": "The source states that blockchain and smart-contract analysis must still consider participating parties, rights and obligations, and the formation prerequisites of offer and acceptance. This qualifies Kaal's claim that automated immutable execution disrupts conventional formation doctrine by showing that the source continues to treat offer and acceptance as necessary legal prerequisites; it does not resolve how doctrine applies across jurisdictions.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "disposition": "retained",
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-continuous-crossref-substantive-review-v1",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-10T11:23:50.025Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex continuous substantive reviewer",
   "rationale": "The source states that blockchain and smart-contract analysis must still consider participating parties, rights and obligations, and the formation prerequisites of offer and acceptance. This qualifies Kaal's claim that automated immutable execution disrupts conventional formation doctrine by showing that the source continues to treat offer and acceptance as necessary legal prerequisites; it does not resolve how doctrine applies across jurisdictions.",
   "limitations": [
    "Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.",
    "No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.",
    "The source states that blockchain and smart-contract analysis must still consider participating parties, rights and obligations, and the formation prerequisites of offer and acceptance. This qualifies Kaal's claim that automated immutable execution disrupts conventional formation doctrine by showing that the source continues to treat offer and acceptance as necessary legal prerequisites; it does not resolve how doctrine applies across jurisdictions."
   ],
   "sourceIdentity": {
    "status": "verified",
    "source": "Crossref REST work record",
    "doi": "10.36475/8.3.11",
    "title": "Signing a Smart Contract",
    "authors": [],
    "language": "ka",
    "publisher": "European University Institute of Law",
    "checkedAt": "2026-08-10T11:23:50.025Z",
    "responseBodySha256": "76fdcd1f620a75767cbc9d22481b958cf198e19ebf817b2a4acd87edd02397d6",
    "providerReceipt": {
     "path": "outputs/historical-backfill-2026-08-08-crossref/raw-receipts/crossref-027-00001.json",
     "sha256": "ac3f0be9e66f4e159c00e37fde2c27135d649562a615b3bc9ecc896f88cd5296",
     "byteLength": 2515276
    }
   },
   "independentRationale": "The exact proposition is present in the live Crossref abstract and the deposited reference list contains no Kaal-authored reference; the relationship is limited to the independently stated proposition.",
   "nonOverlap": {
    "candidateIdMatches": 0,
    "canonicalUrlMatches": 0,
    "propositionHashMatches": 0
   }
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed batch and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "684027ec1ddd2a0df33fc220ff45d68e1ecc4217bb9d491fba9e9adcfcc3b33f"
}