Qualification: Perlindungan Hukum atas Tidak Berfungsinya Proses Transaksi melalui Smart Contract pada Sistem Blockchain

Record: kaal:position:2026-08-08-237 · 2026-08-08

Perlindungan Hukum atas Tidak Berfungsinya Proses Transaksi reports that smart contracts satisfy the elements of electronic agreements and remain valid under civil law when they comply with consensualism. This is a conditional counterpoint to Kaal's enforceability-risk claim and supports the possibility of coded-term validity. It does not establish validity without assent, in every jurisdiction, or for every coded term.

Affirmed commentary position. This record extends a source-bound scholarly claim but is not a verbatim paper claim.

Holds when

The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
External evidence level: abstract indexed.
Mapping review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification.
Primary mapping confidence: 0.62.
The primary mapping cleared the automated ambiguity test; substantive scope remains review-bound.
Evidence is limited to an exact proposition in a Crossref-indexed abstract; full text was not reviewed.
No relationship is treated as external endorsement, citation, causation, or validation of a broader Kaal claim.
The source reports that smart contracts satisfy the elements of electronic agreements and remain valid under civil law when they comply with consensualism. This supplies a conditional counterpoint to Kaal's enforceability-risk claim and supports the possibility of coded-term validity, while it does not establish validity without assent, in every jurisdiction, or for every coded term.

Current debate

Perlindungan Hukum atas Tidak Berfungsinya Proses Transaksi melalui Smart Contract pada Sistem Blockchain

Scholarly basis

kaal:claim:2998033-004
Wulf A. Kaal, Blockchain Innovation for Private Investment Funds (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2998033
Source PDF sha256: aafb1be3c25cd33da477d759df9ca2f856f0a8fe133d6396da2e75d0af573dbd

Evidence and mapping

Evidence: abstract indexed
Review tier: substantively reviewed abstract-level qualification
Mapping confidence: 0.62
Mapping ambiguous: false

Topics

smart-contracts law-and-legal-systems historical-response scholarly-literature crossref

Provenance

Affirmed in kaal-review:2026-08-08:continuous-crossref-0028-global-unique-all-0042-reviewed-v1 on 2026-08-08. Review record.

Verify

Canonical markdown sha256: 80dfcfa9b37f74cfbdd9c554b4062701963930d461fc4464385161775cf87f12
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-237.md | sha256sum