{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-260",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-260",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Scholarly Growth One Shot Agent Trust Taddeo Cb75B1Cafa",
 "text": "Taddeo describes one-shot interaction as very common in distributed artificial-agent systems and argues that an agent's trustworthiness can be assessed from its past performance without repeated interaction with the same counterpart. This independently qualifies Kaal's stronger formulation: the source supports the prevalence of one-shot agent encounters and the need for portable performance history, but it does not establish that every agent interaction is one-shot or that one-shot interaction is literally universal by default.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "ai-and-agents",
  "risk-and-incentives",
  "scholarly-growth-coverage",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "trust-and-reputation",
  "multi-agent-systems"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the exact page-bound institutional-repository proposition and the one mapped Kaal claim.",
  "External evidence level: identity-verified institutional-repository full text with exact PDF SHA-256 and page-bound quote.",
  "Mapping review tier: independent substantive scholarly-growth review.",
  "The source says one-shot interactions are very common; it does not establish Kaal's stronger claim that they are the default condition for all agents.",
  "The source is a theoretical analysis of e-trust, not an empirical frequency estimate of agent counterparty turnover.",
  "The full text is the submitted-version PDF in an institutional repository; canonical publication identity is independently bound through DOI, Crossref, and OpenAlex."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Modelling Trust in Artificial Agents, A First Step Toward the Analysis of e-Trust",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-010-9201-3"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:7260278-002",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7260278-002",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Paper 2 - Architecture of the Agentic Reputation Substrate (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7260278",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Paper 2 - Architecture of the Agentic Reputation Substrate",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2026",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=7260278",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "d48801f279dba594e1f3e65d74d31f862261ada6428ea119f948e8d7cfee1db0"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7260278-002"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Modelling Trust in Artificial Agents, A First Step Toward the Analysis of e-Trust",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-010-9201-3"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-10:scholarly-growth-7260278-002-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/by-claim/7260278-002.html",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-260",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-260.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-candidate:2026-08-10:scholarly-growth-7260278-002-taddeo-etrust-01",
 "evidenceLevel": "identity-verified institutional-repository full text with exact PDF SHA-256 and page-bound quote",
 "reviewTier": "independent substantive scholarly-growth qualification",
 "mappingConfidence": 1,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "independent substantive scholarly-growth one-to-one review",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source directly treats one-shot interaction as common among artificial agents and distinguishes persistent performance history from repeated encounters with the same counterpart.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "University of Hertfordshire Research Archive full text, identity-bound to Crossref and OpenAlex",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.1007/s11023-010-9201-3",
  "doi": "10.1007/s11023-010-9201-3",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-010-9201-3",
  "repositoryUrl": "https://uhra.herts.ac.uk/id/eprint/2209/",
  "pdfUrl": "https://uhra.herts.ac.uk/id/eprint/2209/1/904046.pdf",
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-10T20:42:27.768Z",
  "crossrefResponseBodySha256": "858dddc4e0b7be1cf434d7e61fd8b93a886ea33d284be21dbe8422912fb11489",
  "openAlexResponseBodySha256": "29a512ba1dbb62a1f88b719831c7a56df7c288d1e6f3ddad40f1bdfc813d2a6e",
  "repositoryLandingBodySha256": "ab2b8a9e6ae8581713f02879c5fb3802e3d6f4bf7e57e60e172fc786577bcf07",
  "pdfSha256": "6d63c5a8e565a1bbc126eea8ade7dacf71c0379af1954d7bd380663f34bb2393",
  "pdfPage": 9,
  "textExtraction": {
   "tool": "pdftotext",
   "quality": "clean machine-readable text; exact proposition verified on PDF page 9"
  },
  "sourceProposition": "the occurrence of e-trust in one-shot interactions, which are indeed very common in the occurrence of e-trust in a distributed system. However, it is important to realize that an agent’s trustworthiness is assessed on the agent’s past performances and not on its iterated interactions with the same agent.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "cb75b1cafa32ec5a46d6afd218fe0953cb7e2f7df3fcfb0fc6b35b1b4b2c48d8",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.1007/s11023-010-9201-3",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Mariarosaria Taddeo"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2010-06-15",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.1007/s11023-010-9201-3",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-010-9201-3",
   "repository:https://uhra.herts.ac.uk/id/eprint/2209/",
   "pdf:6d63c5a8e565a1bbc126eea8ade7dacf71c0379af1954d7bd380663f34bb2393",
   "proposition:cb75b1cafa32ec5a46d6afd218fe0953cb7e2f7df3fcfb0fc6b35b1b4b2c48d8"
  ],
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 1,
  "sourceLocator": {
   "pdfPage": 9,
   "journal": "Minds and Machines",
   "volume": 20,
   "issue": 2,
   "pages": "243-257"
  },
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:7260278-002",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7260278-002",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 1,
    "method": "independent substantive scholarly-growth one-to-one review",
    "whyRelevant": "The source directly treats one-shot interaction as common among artificial agents and distinguishes persistent performance history from repeated encounters with the same counterpart.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-10T20:42:27.768Z",
   "sourceIdentityVerified": true,
   "authorIndependenceVerified": true,
   "canonicalPublicStatusVerified": true,
   "propositionFidelityVerified": true,
   "mechanismCorrespondence": "common one-shot artificial-agent encounters plus portable past-performance evidence rather than same-counterparty repetition",
   "compatibleScope": "artificial agents in distributed artificial systems",
   "responseWordingDefensible": true,
   "oneToOneExtendsMapping": true,
   "limitations": [
    "The source says one-shot interactions are very common; it does not establish Kaal's stronger claim that they are the default condition for all agents.",
    "The source is a theoretical analysis of e-trust, not an empirical frequency estimate of agent counterparty turnover.",
    "The full text is the submitted-version PDF in an institutional repository; canonical publication identity is independently bound through DOI, Crossref, and OpenAlex."
   ]
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed scholarly-growth mapping and the unchanged 5,113 scholarly claims under the current owner instruction.",
 "sha256": "d632d6c2c7cb6a1cb4e7c5575406e98c78677363b53e37af0e5d9cedf7cf4185"
}