{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-262",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-262",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Scholarly Growth Knlpers Independent Generation Peer Review Final Judge 4Ca3D5D7F1",
 "text": "K-NLPers operationalizes the core sequence in a bounded inference setting: multiple agents independently generate candidate responses, cross-review and refine peer outputs, and a separate judge selects the final response. This independently extends Kaal's pool design with an implemented three-stage protocol and evaluated multilingual task results. The source does not establish an economic validation pool, reputation or stake, legal finality, or strict role exclusion because producer agents also perform peer critique.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "ai-and-agents",
  "institutional-design",
  "scholarly-growth-coverage",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "multi-agent-systems",
  "deliberation",
  "evaluation-and-adjudication"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the page-bound full-text protocol passage and the one mapped Kaal claim.",
  "External evidence level: identity-verified open full text with exact PDF SHA-256 and a page-bound protocol passage.",
  "Mapping review tier: independent substantive scholarly-growth review.",
  "The source evaluates a culturally grounded inference pipeline, not an economic validation pool or general-purpose institution.",
  "Producer agents also review and refine peer outputs, so production and assessment are stage-separated but not assigned to disjoint agent sets.",
  "The judge's decision is final only within the pipeline; the paper does not claim legal or protocol-wide binding force.",
  "The source contains no staking or reputation mechanism."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "K-NLPers at SemEval-2026 Task 7: Multiple LLM Agent Debate System for Everyday Knowledge Across Diverse Languages and Cultures",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2026.semeval-1.410"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:7260278-004",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7260278-004",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Paper 2 - Architecture of the Agentic Reputation Substrate (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7260278",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Paper 2 - Architecture of the Agentic Reputation Substrate",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2026",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=7260278",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "d48801f279dba594e1f3e65d74d31f862261ada6428ea119f948e8d7cfee1db0"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7260278-004"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "K-NLPers at SemEval-2026 Task 7: Multiple LLM Agent Debate System for Everyday Knowledge Across Diverse Languages and Cultures",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2026.semeval-1.410"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-10:scholarly-growth-7260278-004-reviewed-v2",
 "review_provenance": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/by-claim/7260278-004.html",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-262",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-262.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-candidate:2026-08-10:scholarly-growth-7260278-004-knlpers-01",
 "evidenceLevel": "identity-verified open full text with exact PDF SHA-256 and a page-bound protocol passage",
 "reviewTier": "independent substantive scholarly-growth extension",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.97,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "independent substantive scholarly-growth one-to-one review",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source explicitly stages independent work-product generation, peer critique and refinement, and separate final adjudication in a multi-agent pipeline.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "ACL Anthology open full text, identity-bound to DOI through Crossref and OpenAlex",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.18653/v1/2026.semeval-1.410",
  "doi": "10.18653/v1/2026.semeval-1.410",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2026.semeval-1.410",
  "anthologyUrl": "https://aclanthology.org/2026.semeval-1.410/",
  "pdfUrl": "https://aclanthology.org/2026.semeval-1.410.pdf",
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-10T22:12:27.964Z",
  "crossrefResponseBodySha256": "4ba401e807994b36ddc2233bbece2693e14069e149e9c91df18f8f0d77953f64",
  "openAlexResponseBodySha256": "17fe8052bc219ba93aeec759878584e0068f487f23287c11bde1cc046b6b2315",
  "anthologyHtmlSha256": "4a91dce5d91e02ca60a52f2da48576b9d0600f378f175f52f68c62aa55e757ba",
  "pdfSha256": "8766e9f7d016530b86061e9b8fce5a926eec6918334fc7fcb012ce3d56719c5a",
  "pdfPages": 17,
  "textExtraction": {
   "tool": "pdftotext",
   "quality": "clean machine-readable full text; exact protocol passage verified on PDF page 12"
  },
  "sourceProposition": "K-NLPers operationalizes a three-stage multi-agent pipeline in which agents independently generate candidate responses, cross-review and refine peer outputs, and a separate judge selects the final response.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "60901e98652cce2c45735510a5e6b3b93fef0c7d386a88a82566a8ea9b12a297",
  "evidenceSetSha256": "7896ccbad754e44b102fd926cf8d738592a2c60086d540bb9054ae1d61fe9cda",
  "evidencePassages": [
   {
    "text": "The prompt operationalizes a three-stage debate process consisting of independent response generation, mutual critique & refinement, and final adjudication by explicitly defining agent roles, interaction protocols, and evaluation criteria. It is designed to elicit culturally grounded open-ended responses, guiding each agent to generate an initial answer, review peer outputs, and revise its reasoning before a judge model determines the final response.",
    "sha256": "a3de5d485783b18f99720a80fd525db60a4ea3bf8042ade97ef50357c5677635",
    "locator": {
     "pdfPage": 12,
     "section": "Appendix C - Track 1: Short Answer Questions (SAQ) Prompts"
    }
   }
  ],
  "workId": "work:doi:10.18653/v1/2026.semeval-1.410",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Jiwoo Song",
   "Sihyeong Yeom",
   "Harksoo Kim"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2026",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.18653/v1/2026.semeval-1.410",
   "acl-anthology:2026.semeval-1.410",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2026.semeval-1.410",
   "pdf:8766e9f7d016530b86061e9b8fce5a926eec6918334fc7fcb012ce3d56719c5a",
   "evidence-set:7896ccbad754e44b102fd926cf8d738592a2c60086d540bb9054ae1d61fe9cda",
   "proposition:60901e98652cce2c45735510a5e6b3b93fef0c7d386a88a82566a8ea9b12a297"
  ],
  "sourceEvidenceSetSha256": "7896ccbad754e44b102fd926cf8d738592a2c60086d540bb9054ae1d61fe9cda",
  "sourceEvidencePassages": [
   {
    "text": "The prompt operationalizes a three-stage debate process consisting of independent response generation, mutual critique & refinement, and final adjudication by explicitly defining agent roles, interaction protocols, and evaluation criteria. It is designed to elicit culturally grounded open-ended responses, guiding each agent to generate an initial answer, review peer outputs, and revise its reasoning before a judge model determines the final response.",
    "sha256": "a3de5d485783b18f99720a80fd525db60a4ea3bf8042ade97ef50357c5677635",
    "locator": {
     "pdfPage": 12,
     "section": "Appendix C - Track 1: Short Answer Questions (SAQ) Prompts"
    }
   }
  ],
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:7260278-004",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7260278-004",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.97,
    "method": "independent substantive scholarly-growth one-to-one review",
    "whyRelevant": "The source explicitly stages independent work-product generation, peer critique and refinement, and separate final adjudication in a multi-agent pipeline.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-10T22:12:27.964Z",
   "sourceIdentityVerified": true,
   "authorIndependenceVerified": true,
   "canonicalPublicStatusVerified": true,
   "propositionFidelityVerified": true,
   "mechanismCorrespondence": "independent candidate production, peer cross-assessment and refinement, and separate final judgment",
   "compatibleScope": "multilingual culturally grounded short-answer generation in a multi-LLM pipeline",
   "responseWordingDefensible": true,
   "oneToOneExtendsMapping": true,
   "sameSourceDistinctionVerified": true,
   "limitations": [
    "The source evaluates a culturally grounded inference pipeline, not an economic validation pool or general-purpose institution.",
    "Producer agents also review and refine peer outputs, so production and assessment are stage-separated but not assigned to disjoint agent sets.",
    "The judge's decision is final only within the pipeline; the paper does not claim legal or protocol-wide binding force.",
    "The source contains no staking or reputation mechanism."
   ]
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed scholarly-growth mapping and the unchanged 5,145 scholarly claims under the current owner instruction.",
 "sha256": "24ba008e2a942e4db344bf4118202af0690ad33d9e1192c3e22d4b73cd014446"
}